Cloud // Platform as a Service
News
3/6/2014
09:48 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cloud Crossroads: Which Way PaaS?

As allies and competitors line up behind the new Cloud Foundry Foundation, where does that leave Red Hat and its support of OpenStack and Project Solum?

up behind Cloud Foundry, they were financing its ongoing development. Until Cloud Foundry was separated from VMware, they wouldn't have done such a thing. Once VMware/Pivotal relinquished control, it became a candidate for broader support, just as OpenStack had after Rackspace relinquished control of it.

The enlistment of Red Hat's ally, Rackspace, must also have been a bitter pill. Asked to comment on these developments, a Red Hat spokesman said, "Thanks for reaching out about this. We are going to respectfully decline to comment at this time."

On Feb. 24, the same day that Maritz announced independent governance for Cloud Foundry, IBM announced its BlueMix PaaS that will be "built on open standards and take advantage of Cloud Foundry." As a backer of OpenStack, Red Hat might have anticipated IBM would want to work with Project Solum in creating PaaS on OpenStack. Its embrace of the VMware/Pivotal PaaS was another blow.

It appeared that key OpenStack developers and member companies had decided, en masse, to place their primary PaaS bet on Cloud Foundry, not Project Solum or some future combination of Solum and OpenShift.

Won't Cloud Foundry and OpenShift both continue to exist? Can't they coexist as competing open-source options far into the future? Joshua McKenty, the CTO of Piston, a leading OpenStack distributor, doesn't think so. In an email message Tuesday, he said he will bet $10 that "Red Hat will join the Cloud Foundry Foundation by the end of the year."

"Solum is a stalking horse for Red Hat. They are trying to use it to inject OpenShift into OpenStack. It has no independent momentum. For a project to succeed inside OpenStack, and in almost all open source, it needs a use case and sponsors putting money behind it, and Solum doesn't have either."

McKenty made less blunt but similar comments to cloud blogger Ben Kepes, posted on Forbes.com Feb. 26. Red Hat declined when asked to respond to McKenty's comments.

Not so fast, said Alex Freedland, co-founder and chairman of Mirantis, an OpenStack consulting firm, in a phone interview. Red Hat has formidable development resources of its own and is "highly motivated to see OpenShift succeed." Without OpenShift, Red Hat's path to the cloud becomes unclear. It's an operating system vendor, but in the cloud, virtualization is the visible layer and Linux disappears behind management consoles and virtual machine managers. If Red Hat doesn't have an opportunity to provide software above the operating system, its future looks limited.

Freedland said Solum isn't left out in the cold just because the Cloud Foundry Foundation has formed. "I don't know how long before it's useful, but Red Hat is actually moving it along at a decent pace," he said.

The question, he said, is whether Red Hat can attract a following of developers that will rival the lineup now behind Cloud Foundry. So far, Red Hat is making 30% of the code contributions to Solum; Rackspace is making 22%; and Numergy, 20%. It's best if the primary sponsor of an open source project contributes 20%, with other parties making up the balance. It's taken as a sign of a healthy project, said Freedland. But Rackspace as a board member may move its developer contribution effort over to Cloud Foundry. Company spokesman were queried, but did not respond in time for this article.

Likewise, Solum is likely to lose IBM's contributions. It was in the second tier of contributors, along with Suse and Mirantis. With Red Hat competitor Canonical now in the Cloud Foundry camp, Suse may deem it wise to likewise join. Instead of decreasing, Red Hat's share of the contributions to Solum may rise steeply.

Cloud Foundry is likely to have its own issues to work out. There are now powerful vendors who might like to develop Cloud Foundry products that generate revenue, but so far the only one successfully doing so is Pivotal. If Pivotal keeps its primary position as other vendors help develop the PaaS, then IBM and the others may want to rethink their commitment. But that equation was already clear as they signed up, and IBM, HP, and SAP tend to use open source as a means toward building a larger system, versus as a product in itself.

So the future of open-source PaaS is now anyone's guess. Will Red Hat sustain Solum, even if it has to work with a shrunken community, or will it throw in the towel, as McKenty suggested? OpenStack, Solum, and its new expertise in Docker containerization all indicate Red Hat will make a fight of it and try to keep open its own path into the cloud.

Can the trendy tech strategy of DevOps really bring peace between developers and IT operations -- and deliver faster, more reliable app creation and delivery? Also in the DevOps Challenge issue of InformationWeek: Execs charting digital business strategies can't afford to take Internet connectivity for granted.

Charles Babcock is an editor-at-large for InformationWeek, having joined the publication in 2003. He is the former editor-in-chief of Digital News, former software editor of Computerworld and former technology editor of Interactive Week. He is a graduate of Syracuse ... View Full Bio

Previous
2 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
jpmorgenthal-tw
50%
50%
jpmorgenthal-tw,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/10/2014 | 10:50:04 PM
Welcome To The Playoffs, Who's in the Superbowl?
Mark Thiele's post touched on the point that the two projects discussed here represent a subset of the overall PaaS market, but neither is focused on migrating all types of enterprise workloads. Indeed, both are focused on deploying next generation cloud-design applications. Ultimately, whatever the outcome of these two projects battling it out, it's merely the playoffs. They still have to square off with Azure, AWS, Apcera in the public arena and the likes of established vendors that Gartner groups into aPaaS in the private cloud space to see what share of the overall PaaS market they will garner. 

Personally, I wouldn't count RedHat out. PaaS adoption is a very small subset of cloud initiatives today. As the market for these platforms grow, they will be looking for vendors that have success in the application development space. JBoss owns a lot of that attention today. If RedHat can convert their JBoss clientele into OpenShift users, this opening salvo by Pivotal et. al. will merely be the lucky kickoff return for a touchdown followed by no points on the board for the rest of the game.

Moreover, consider what IBM did to Sun with Java with regard to fostering it's most successful use and becoming it's number one benefactor. Now, look at what's occurring with Pivotal and look what they're doing with BlueMix. The strategies are very similar. They rode Sun's large-scale investment and ownership of the platform until Sun was gone and now they have the opportunity to repeat with CloudFoundry.

In the endgame, AWS claims they're not a PaaS, but they're not fooling anyone. The next round of PaaS brackets break down as follows:

AWS vs. IBM <-> Microsoft vs. RedHat
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/10/2014 | 8:15:58 PM
Is PaaS a feature of a cloud or gateway to a cloud?
Is PaaS just a feature of infrastructure as a service? Reuven Cohen made that argument convincingly here: http://www.informationweek.com/cloud/platform-as-a-service/cloud-crossroads-which-way-paas/d/d-id/1114123?  

Or is it the other way around. The best way to access cloud infrastructure is through a PaaS. For the enterprise, I think it's this prospect that has long term appeal, though I don't know that all enterprise IT shops think this way. It takes a DevOps mindset and that's still a suspect proposition in some cases. Despite disadvantages at the moment, Red Hat is in a position to deliver on OpenShift as a way to build RHEL applications in the cloud and deliver RHEL applications to the cloud. Will it still strive to do so through an OpenStack project, with its former compatriots defecting to Cloud Foundry? I don't know. I'm thinking Krishnan Subramanian may offer part of the answer in another contributed IW column soon.
krishsubramanian
50%
50%
krishsubramanian,
User Rank: Strategist
3/10/2014 | 7:02:36 PM
Re: Meh....
Ben, you are entitled to have your own opinion. But your claim that we haven't spoken in a long time is not true. Just last week we exchanged email regarding the past business relationship involving money. I am not debating with you on other topics you raised as it is your own opinion but I just wanted to point out that we have coimmunicated as recently as last week.
alex_freedland
50%
50%
alex_freedland,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/8/2014 | 12:33:22 PM
Does there have to be an either/or?
I am ready to take on Josh for $10, heck, I can even up the ante and go for $25 bucks! Josh, are you on?

Having said that, I am not sure why we have to choose between Solum (or whatever it will end up being) and CloudFountry. The two, in my opinion, have two distincly different value propositions. 

CloudFoundry is a cross-platform PaaS that is designed to work on top of multiple IaaS's and provide the application developers and owners cross platform support. 

Solum is a native PaaS for OpenStack that will guarantee the best native integration with the core of OpenStack, thus develiering better performance, seamless integration and better economics. 

A rough analogy from the yesteryear would be ODBC vs. PL*SQL on top of the Oracle database. ODBC was commonly used by people wanting to support Sybase, Informix, DB2 and MS SQL, while PL*SQL was also commonly used by the folks who wanted to optimize their Oracle database performance only. 

Both approaches are viable and are likely to have many customers. 
jemison288
100%
0%
jemison288,
User Rank: Moderator
3/8/2014 | 9:19:55 AM
Traction is the key
I think Mark Thiele has nailed the issue here: PaaS is still niche. It reminds me of Linux in the mid-to-late-1990s: quite fragmented, and while it offers benefits, the learning/implementation curve combined with legitimate concerns that you can't actually implement what you want without breaking the benefits with hacks and workarounds means much more limited adoption than OpenStack/CloudStack/other private-cloud-enabling platforms. Add to this the fact that the PaaS choice for many marquee organization is a completely different one--CloudBees--that focuses on a more narrow goal (smaller learning curve, more guaranteed implementation). (Also in this category: Azure, Apprenda). I remain skeptical that non-VM-based deployments (e.g., based on any Linux scripting language) can fit properly into the PaaS mold. Those deployments are overwhelmingly choosing configuration management (usually Chef or CloudFormation) over PaaS. So I see this debate as a lot of soon-to-be-legacy companies fighting over a small space that's being won by different solutions. Citing 750 developers is pretty pathetic--check GitHub for cloudformation-based code, and you'll see why.
benkepes01
50%
50%
benkepes01,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2014 | 10:58:12 PM
Meh....
With the usual series of disclsoures (for details, just look at my disclsoure page but briefly, I'm an adviser to ActiveState by way of their acquisition of Appsecute. Previosuly I've worked with Krishnan Subramanian who, despite saying his tweets and blog comments are completely his alone, also works for OpenShift/RedHat. Note that while Krish and I used to work together, we haven't spoken for a long time and the only time I hear from him is indirectly by way of tweets questioning my sanity/morality/ethics/etc. I've spent time, shared beers and dinner and generally hung out with a bunch of folks in the PaaS world), here's my take.

10 months? Sorry Josh, if only for ego and appearances sake, RedHat won't pull the plus on OpenShift in that time. That's not to say that it won't happen, it'll just take a little longer. The very interesting thing would be to see how RedHat spun it and what it meant for the vehement "OpenShift forver" crew within RH.

Clearly Rackspace screwed over RedHat in launching Solum and then jumping into the Cloud Foundry world. But what else could they do? Solum is a nothing, an announcement with little substance. OpenShift may have customers but it's unfortunately either created or been thrust into an apparent zero sum battle with Cloud Foundry and it's patently obvious who is winning that - CF has almost every big vendor on board, it's winning the attention battle and unfortunately OpenShift responds not with good stories of customer wins (which I'm sure exist) but with a continual barrage of snark - regardless whether it comes form individual's accounts and is appended with a "personal views only" statement, that stuff sticks and it feels like a very defensive RedHat coming through.

It's also worrisome that apart from a small band of folks, we don't see a lot of love given to OpenShift from the RedHat execs, maybe the RedHat summit will change that but, for obvious reasons, I'm about as likely to hear about that as James Watters is to get an invite to the OpenShift drinks.

Underlying all of this is the fact that Docker specifically, and containers generally, are the flavor de jour, and much of the PaaS value prop is delivered by containers (at least for Linux apps). In this regard Cloud Foundry has the advantage since (for Pivotal at least) it's part of a greater whole and Pivotal can quickly spin a story about all the other goodness that was spun into it from EMC and VMare.

PaaS isn't dead (despite comments from pundit-critics who suggest I've said it is), but PaaS is going to change as it works out where it sits between IaaS vendors rapidly moving up the stack, container offerings doing much fo the protability stuff, management tools doing scaling, and application vendors moving down into the declarative platform space. Lots of thinking to do huh?

Right - that's my 2 cents, now we just wait for the barrage of comments suggesting that I know nothing about the space. Coming in 3, 2, 1...
brentsmi
100%
0%
brentsmi,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2014 | 6:58:30 PM
Re: RedHat joining Cloud Foundry foundation is wrong for PaaS
Renat, I agree with your point:

"If one thing that RedHat could do to make the world a better place - is to collaborate with Cloud Foundry community, to standardize around run-time and services, which are now incompatible."

That's why Stackato decided to use buildpacks (only used by Heroku at the time, IIRC) almost two years ago. Of course, Cloud Foundry is now on buildpacks as well. Everybody standardizing on buildpacks would be a step in the right direction. Services themselves are pretty standard across PaaS platforms but the "connectors" to them are not yet.
mthiele1001
50%
50%
mthiele1001,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2014 | 6:25:02 PM
Re: How will this PaaS tragedy play out...
Hi Charles, just want to clarify that I work for SUPERNAP who runs the SUPERNAPs.  :)
brentsmi
50%
50%
brentsmi,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2014 | 6:24:36 PM
Re: Does Joshua only pay north of the border?
Charles, I only mentioned Canada in response to you wondering whether you'd have to pay tax on your winnings; I have no idea how the IRS works, but here in Canada you'd be fine. I didn't even know Josh was a fellow Canadian... And, sadly, the loonie is only worth about 90 cents US currently so you're better off collecting down there.
Charlie Babcock
100%
0%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
3/7/2014 | 3:24:56 PM
Re: How will this PaaS tragedy play out...
Mark Thiele of InterNAP SuperNAP data center builder, (just renamed from Switch), makes an excellent point. There is a bigger issue here. There's no such thing as a cross-cloud PaaS platform, with one or two immature exceptions. Maybe this debate contributes to thinking about one, maybe it doesn't.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Google in the Enterprise Survey
Google in the Enterprise Survey
There's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity ­products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent ­mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers ­distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A UBM Tech Radio episode on the changing economics of Flash storage used in data tiering -- sponsored by Dell.
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.