Next month, the vendor of tiered storage systems plans to add remote replication and storage resource management features to its product line.
Compellent Technologies has an extra $15 million in the bank thanks to a new round of funding.
It's money the Minneapolis-based developer of technology for implementing automated tiered storage really doesn't need to get to sustained profitability, but it will help the company as it moves towards a possible initial public offering next year, said Phil Soran, president, CEO and founder.
"We're raising money when we don't really need it," Soran said. "It shows valuation in the company, and gives us money for the fight coming."
That fight includes a possible IPO, Soran said. "We're on the path," he said. "In 2007, we'll establish solid profitability, and see what happens. Sustained profitability has come a little earlier than I planned."
With this round of financing, the company's fourth since 2002, Compellent has received a total of over $53 in venture capital, Soran said.
"Our competitors have raised a lot more money," he said. "It's a validation of our business model that we can do so well. There are seven or eight competitors in the SATA, iSCSI, high-performance computing, and NAS space that have raised $150 million to $250 million each."
Compellent's funding came from a number of venture capital sources, including The Nomura Group, but none has come from strategic investors, Soran said. "That's good news," he said. "A lot of times strategic investors come with strings attached that can hamper your business model."
5 Top Federal Initiatives For 2015As InformationWeek Government readers were busy firming up their fiscal year 2015 budgets, we asked them to rate more than 30 IT initiatives in terms of importance and current leadership focus. No surprise, among more than 30 options, security is No. 1. After that, things get less predictable.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?