Business & Finance
04:18 PM

Court Ruling Impacts Liability For User-Generated Content

Web sites may now be held responsible for some users' illegal or inflammatory content following a court case against

A recent court ruling holds Web sites responsible for some user-generated content and could change the way sites control such content.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that the Web site can be held liable for violating the federal Fair Housing Act by allowing discriminatory postings. In Fair Housing Council v., the court ruled that the Communications Decency Act doesn't protect the site from claims brought by two California fair housing groups.

The court stated that, by categorizing, channeling, and limiting the distribution of users' profiles, the site was at least partly responsible for creating or developing information on the site. The court held that the site was responsible for some user-generated content because "unlawful information was provided by users in direct response to questions and prompts from the operator of the Web site."

The ruling clarifies the portion of the Communications Decency Act that states providers or users of interactive computer services shall not be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by someone else. Other rulings interpreted the language to mean that Web site operators are not liable for illegal content that others post on their forums.

Michael Bennett, a partner in the intellectual property department of Chicago law firm Wildman Harrold, said that previous cases confirmed and expanded immunity for ISPs, Web site operators, and listservs.

"Then this one comes down and begins to draw some lines," he said during an interview Thursday.

The new ruling means that sites that control user-generated content -- especially dating and automated brokering sites that use "matching" technology -- are considered publishers and are therefore liable, Bennett said.

"If you guide the content too much, or select which of the content will be allowed, you could lose immunity for that portion of the content and be held liable as a publisher," Bennett said. "The problem arises when nonpublishing Web sites want to put up blogs and forums. Typically, they want to guide the content to some extent, so that it reflects an appropriate image for the site and company."

1 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Top IT Trends to Watch in Financial Services
IT pros at banks, investment houses, insurance companies, and other financial services organizations are focused on a range of issues, from peer-to-peer lending to cybersecurity to performance, agility, and compliance. It all matters.
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on for the week of July 17, 2016. We'll be talking with the editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week to get the "story behind the story."
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.