Apple Patent Application Describes Multi-Touch Mac
The 52-page diagram shows gestures on the touch screen associated with a number of tasks, including zooming, panning, scrolling, rotating, and enlarging.
Apple's Multi-Touch Mac (click for larger image)
An Apple patent application published Thursday describes a multi-touch Mac tablet, reigniting speculation on the Web that the Macintosh and iPod maker is looking to extend its popular iPhone technology to Apple computers.
In general, gestures on the touch screen would be associated with a number of tasks, including zooming, panning, scrolling, rotating, enlarging, floating controls, zooming targets, paging, inertia, keyboarding, and wheeling, said the application, which was first reported by enthusiast site AppleInsider. Among the inventors listed on the application is Jonathan Paul Ive, who is senior VP of industrial design at Apple.
The British designer is renowned as the principal designer of the iMac, the aluminum PowerPook G4, the MacBook Pro, iPod, and iPhone.
An application does not necessarily mean a product, and Apple does not discuss roadmaps. Nevertheless, speculation that something may be in the works has been going on for weeks.
Oppenheimer declined to provide any details of what Apple was working on, but promised it would be "state of the art" and unmatched by rivals.
TheStreet.com's Gary Krakow is one believer in a tablet computer, saying it would likely be based on the popular iPhone touch screen. MacRumors said the device could be a 12-inch or 13-inch Mac tablet that would ship in September or October.
Server Market SplitsvilleJust because the server market's in the doldrums doesn't mean innovation has ceased. Far from it -- server technology is enjoying the biggest renaissance since the dawn of x86 systems. But the primary driver is now service providers, not enterprises.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?