Infrastructure // PC & Servers
Commentary
7/25/2012
09:56 AM
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Glasses: Does This Make Sense?

Yes, I want Google Glass glasses. But here's why you probably won't.

Last month I looked at putting a phone into a tablet, a concept with (IMHO) limited appeal but not likely to fail altogether. This month, though, I've got one that really is going to flop--even though it's cool, exciting, and even revolutionary. I'm talking about putting a phone into eyeglasses or a similar head-mounted form factor, with Google's Project Glass being the current poster child for this approach. Whereas we'll see Phablets in some limited vertical and consumer applications, don't count on too many people sporting cellular headsets--think of this instead as the Segway scooter of the wireless world--intriguing, and, yes, cool, but ultimately very, very rare.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but how come we're not seeing Segways everywhere? This concept lit up the airwaves (to use an analogy) when it was announced back in 2001, and everyone--everyone--wanted one, or at least wanted to try one. Imagine a personal transportation device that's compact, environmentally friendly, and devastatingly cool. That's a Segway. So why is it, once again, that we're not all riding around on one today? (Just to be clear, I still want one badly, but, then, I'm a confirmed gadget addict who occasionally, or maybe a little more often than that, abandons the practical just for fun and adventure.)

The answer is simple--the Segway isn't at all, um, practical, in any broad-based sense of the word; think congested urban streets and sidewalks, and limited cargo capability. Think about tooling around on one of these when the weather's not all that great (I live in New England). OK, bicycles suffer from a similar handicap, but we see plenty of those everywhere. But, then, bicycles are much more cost-effective--a serviceable model can be had for less than $1,000. But a Segway--well, if you have to ask, you can't afford one. These are still priced like decent used cars.

So, to get back to the topic at hand today, cost is the number one issue here: Google Glass will cost developers around $1,500; the price for consumers is still unknown. But it gets worse, and let's start with that matter of practicality. A tiny touchpad for data entry and control--no keyboard. No cellular connectivity (yet). And, of course, if you already wear glasses, well, something to be done about that as well. Don't even think about wearing these while driving. While much has been made of limitations in screen and camera resolution and onboard storage, to be fair what we have today is a prototype, so let's cut Google (and everyone else who might jump in here--this means you, Apple) some slack at present--except regarding that part about practicality.

The concept of wearable or head-mounted computing, BTW, isn't new--before I started Farpoint Group, more than two decades ago, I worked in supercomputing and on a number of virtual-reality applications--you know, with expensive and uncomfortable head-mounted displays that were the best we could do at the time to provide an immersive experience for a single individual. Over the years display technology has become more compact, and we can even provision something akin to a HDTV experience for those seeking a personal video-viewing environment (the Google Glass display is in fact 720p, not bad at all). But there's a big difference between watching a video and managing information. This is without question great marketing on Google's part, but let's not get carried away.

And there's another big issue here: In a world growing ever more leery of eccentric behavior (yes, let's go with that for the moment), it's possible that such sophisticated technology as Google Glass may even be seen as a threat. Recently, in a report from the Associated Press, a computer science professor wearing a device not too dissimilar from Google's was assaulted by the employees of a McDonald's in Paris for fear he was violating their privacy. Extreme? Sure--today. But there's regardless a cautionary note here: Technological change that disrupts societal norms may not receive a warm welcome. For now, though, the limited capabilities--the impracticality--of Google Glass trump all other considerations. This is a toy for gadget freaks, and will remain such for a very long time. And, yes, just in case you were wondering--I want one of these, too.

InformationWeek is conducting a survey to determine how IT is perceived in the enterprise. Take our InformationWeek 2012 IT Perception Survey now. Survey ends Aug. 3.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe A.
50%
50%
Joe A.,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/1/2012 | 1:18:43 PM
re: Google Glasses: Does This Make Sense?
This article touches on a great point G«Ű G«£technological change that disrupts societal norms may not receive a warm welcome.G«• Similar to the rising concern for privacy in the tech world, consumers may resist some new innovations just because they are different. New technologies always bring up new concerns, for products such as these to become the G«£normG«•, new regulations to bolster consumer confidence will be a likely first step. I'm an early adopter, so I'm ready to try 'em! http://bit.ly/HWhOoo
Major_Pita
50%
50%
Major_Pita,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/31/2012 | 12:57:46 AM
re: Google Glasses: Does This Make Sense?
Craig, the problem with this kind of technology is that while covered (fleetingly) by mainstream press it will be a long time, if ever, before it goes mainstream. Case in point - the Segway. It was too expensive and a product before it's time. Do you recall how other electric drive devices were perceived in 2001? Right, as expensive, and often flakey novelties or toys. However there are a few exceptions...like electric forklifts and other heavy-duty industrial tools. That is the niche where these products work - special applications. I have seen Segways used by law enforcement in crowd patrol in place of horses and in other types of extended patrol situations with good results, especially if fitted with GPS.

With respect to the Google Glass project, they will not even be available until late 2013 or 2014. It is likely that they too will not really be consumer devices, but rather industrial and institutional. Their most effective role will probably be as augmented reality overlay devices. The input controls are likely to be lightweight VR gauntlet type, but more like driving gloves, with sensors that allow interaction with objects in the overlay. Think: Fire Fighters able to overlay building elevations onto their view as they search for survivors; Tactical overlays for LEOs and military Spec-OPs; and replacements for HUDs in aircraft to name a few.

Commercial applications could easily be seen as a dashboard overlay for performance motocyclists where you'd look 'through' the instruments and gauges(safer than looking down). Not to say that some won't be bought for ahem, other purposes...

Finally, by the time Glass becomes available to John Q. Public they will likely be much more subtle than the gear worn in the French McDonald's incident and may even go unnoticed.
Tom LaSusa
50%
50%
Tom LaSusa,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/30/2012 | 7:07:09 PM
re: Google Glasses: Does This Make Sense?
The second the first person, paying more attention to the text in front of their eyes, ignores oncoming traffic and gets hurt, this product will be reviled.

Some tech advancements belong safely ensconced in the realm of science fiction.

Tom LaSusa
InformationWeek
GAProgrammer
50%
50%
GAProgrammer,
User Rank: Ninja
7/30/2012 | 6:57:18 PM
re: Google Glasses: Does This Make Sense?
Come on, not EVERYONE wanted a Segway, just the techie types. Even then, not all of them wanted one. All the techs I knew thought it was dumb.

I do agree with you that in todays climate of privacy concerns, the Google Glasses won' thrive. People already use phone cams, but at least you can see them recording. Fear alone will keep these from ever becoming popular in the near future, IMO.
Server Market Splitsville
Server Market Splitsville
Just because the server market's in the doldrums doesn't mean innovation has ceased. Far from it -- server technology is enjoying the biggest renaissance since the dawn of x86 systems. But the primary driver is now service providers, not enterprises.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest September 18, 2014
Enterprise social network success starts and ends with integration. Here's how to finally make collaboration click.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
The weekly wrap-up of the top stories from InformationWeek.com this week.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.