In Emergencies, People Turn To Web 2.0, Not Traditional News
When danger is at their door, people turn to social media sites, blogs, and instant messages, rather than the mainstream news media, for necessary information. Twitter and Google mashups in particular prove far more useful than traditional government channels, according to a report prepared at the University of Colorado. I learned that the hard way myself last year.
When danger is at their door, people turn to social media sites, blogs, and instant messages, rather than the mainstream news media, for necessary information. Twitter and Google mashups in particular prove far more useful than traditional government channels, according to a report prepared at the University of Colorado. I learned that the hard way myself last year.The Telegraph reports on how people used social media during two emergencies: The Virginia Tech mass-murder, and last year's Southern California wildfires:
During the California fires, Web users on sites including instant messaging forum Twitter kept friends and neighbours informed of their condition, minute by minute.
They also used Google Maps to track the progress of the fire and mark areas where schools and businesses were closed.
However, the authorities struggled to display the sufficient up-to-date information.
The mass media were unreliable, the study found, as they struggled to access remote areas from which Web site users with an Internet connection could easily report.
Media sites also focused on the 'sensational', such as fires close to celebrities' homes, which distorted the overall picture, the scientists said.
My wife and I live in San Diego, we've been here 11 years, and we've lived through two really bad wildfire seasons, both of which threatened to force us to evacuate. In the latest round, this past October, I found TV news had limited usefulness, but Twitter and Google Maps were great for getting the most important information into my hands rapidly. That information being: How close are the wildfires to our house?
The immediate threat seems to have passed for my wife and me here in San Diego, as fires ravage Southern California. But it's still essential for us to keep an eye on the situation. The TV news is first-rate for getting an overview. But Google Maps and Twitter provide a running answer to the question that's most important to me and my wife: Is our neighborhood and our house in any immediate danger?
Google Maps helps when I hear the name of a community that's been evacuated, and want to know where it is in relationship to our neighborhood. We've been living in San Diego 10 years, and I still don't know where the overwhelming majority of neighborhoods are. How far away are we from Valley Center? Spring Valley? When I hear the name of a community that's been evacuated, I type it into Google Maps and then get driving directions to our house. That gives me a general idea of the straight-line distance between that community and our neighborhood. If driving route is particularly circuitous, Google Maps lets me draw my own route by hand, and keep track of the mileage.
The TV news seemed focused (as the Telegraph notes) on celebrity gossip, and also "human-interest" stories, which basically consisted of interviewing people who'd been evacuated from their homes and asking them how they felt about it. (Answer: They didn't really care for it.)
And now for the obligatory self-promotion: You have two options for subscribing to InformationWeek headlines on Twitter: http://twitter.com/informationweek is an automated feed of all IW's blog and article headlines, while http://twitter.com/iwpicks contains headlines and links to only the best InformationWeek articles and blogs, laboriously updated a couple of times a day by yours truly.
Server Market SplitsvilleJust because the server market's in the doldrums doesn't mean innovation has ceased. Far from it -- server technology is enjoying the biggest renaissance since the dawn of x86 systems. But the primary driver is now service providers, not enterprises.