The Ultimate I/O - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Infrastructure // PC & Servers
Commentary
4/27/2009
02:29 PM
50%
50%
RELATED EVENTS
Moving UEBA Beyond the Ground Floor
Sep 20, 2017
This webinar will provide the details you need about UEBA so you can make the decisions on how bes ...Read More>>

The Ultimate I/O

Researchers have sent a Twitter message by simply thinking it via a setup that read a user's thoughts, and then translated them into text. The folks at Twitter should embrace this experiment, and at least two of the wild possibilities it suggests.

Researchers have sent a Twitter message by simply thinking it via a setup that read a user's thoughts, and then translated them into text. The folks at Twitter should embrace this experiment, and at least two of the wild possibilities it suggests.The test was decidedly unsexy, in that the user had to actively think of individual letters to piece together a brief text message. Moving a cursor across a computer screen merely by the power of thought isn't new, per se, but applying it to the realm of social conversation is...especially matching a rather laborious input process to a severely limited output (messages on Twitter max out at 140 characters).

But I'm thinking down the road a bit. There's been chatter about Twitter getting acquired, along with sundry musing about its future utility. This brain-reading business suggests at least two potential applications that might make its brand stand for something far more than happy chatter:

First, why not throw gazillions against the technology, and make sending messages by thinking a no-brainer, so to speak?

Typing is dumb and slow, even if it's only 140 characters' worth, and so much of Twitter's brand proposition is about frequency and immediacy. If you could just think your updates, imagine how many people could throw at one another (and then start salivating over the ad revenue from folks paying attention to every post).

Second, if Twitter could read your mind, why not configure it so it would send what you were truly thinking, not just what you wanted to say?

Let's say every participant signed on to send a tweet to one another every hour, only they couldn't manipulate or otherwise control what they said? It would provide true visibility into what people were thinking. In other words, it could be a truth engine.

Frightening proposition? You bet. An amazing brand proposition? I think so.

The challenge would be to figure out whether there's any money to be made from such mind-reading...although nobody ever stopped to ask if there was money in swapping messages to begin with.

What do you think?

Jonathan Salem Baskin writes the Dim Bulb blog and is the author of Branding Only Works On Cattle.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
IT Strategies to Conquer the Cloud
Chances are your organization is adopting cloud computing in one way or another -- or in multiple ways. Understanding the skills you need and how cloud affects IT operations and networking will help you adapt.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll