Infrastructure // PC & Servers
Commentary
9/27/2011
03:34 PM
Larry Seltzer
Larry Seltzer
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
Facebook
Google+
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Time To Update Firefox--Again

In a bid to become a little more enterprise friendly, Mozilla has decelerated its hectic six-week upgrade cycle--but not by much.

If you're a Firefox user you might have noticed that updates come much more frequently these days. That's because Mozilla has decided on a six-week cycle--for major versions. Firefox 6 was released six weeks ago on August 16. Today Firefox 7 is scheduled to be released.

Several months back many users and analysts raised a stink over this release hypercycle and how it, along with some other deficiencies, makes it hard for enterprises to use Firefox. The stink got worse when a Mozilla rep said that the organization just wasn't interested in enterprises. Since then, they've taken some baby steps toward accommodating the needs of larger organizations. They won't inconvenience themselves too much, though.

Large organizations--at least those that aren't insane--don't roll out software to their users without some vetting, nor do they let users install whatever they please. A six-week cycle is much too frequent to allow for a reasonable test. Mozilla also has explicitly resisted providing a manageable installer (generally .MSI and .MST files for Windows), making it much harder to distribute the software, especially updates. But they had to do something, so Mozilla reactivated a long-dormant Enterprise User Working Group and worked with it to figure out what was possible. The discussions have led to an initial proposal for a more stable branch of development.

Currently, not only does Mozilla release a new version every six weeks, but it discontinues support for the old one at the same time. Under the proposal, every fifth version--starting with Firefox 8, then 13, then 18, and so on--would have a much longer life cycle of 42 weeks. Every six weeks when the major version revs, this version, called the ESR or Extended Support Release, would get a .01 increment version name, incorporating fixes for "...high-risk/impact security vulnerabilities and would also include chemspills (off-schedule releases that address live security vulnerabilities)." Chemspills. I love that.

It's only a small excuse for Mozilla that it was Google who started the whole crazy-short major version cycle problem. It's just a little over three years since their Google's initial pre-release version and it's up to version 14. Perhaps this is what makes Mozilla feel it has to move faster. But at least Google provides an MSI installer for the full version so you can push it out using group policy.

But it's fair to say Google also makes it hard for businesses to use their browser as an "official" browser. Every wonder why so many businesses stick with IE as their official browser? This is why.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Server Market Splitsville
Server Market Splitsville
Just because the server market's in the doldrums doesn't mean innovation has ceased. Far from it -- server technology is enjoying the biggest renaissance since the dawn of x86 systems. But the primary driver is now service providers, not enterprises.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest September 18, 2014
Enterprise social network success starts and ends with integration. Here's how to finally make collaboration click.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
The weekly wrap-up of the top stories from InformationWeek.com this week.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.