Infrastructure // PC & Servers
05:17 PM
Serdar Yegulalp
Serdar Yegulalp
Connect Directly
Core System Testing: How to Achieve Success
Oct 06, 2016
Property and Casualty Insurers have been investing in modernizing their core systems to provide fl ...Read More>>

Why 'Do Not Track' Still Doesn't Cut It

A consistent standard for opting out of advertiser tracking on the Web is a nice idea. Too bad that's all it might ever be.

Mozilla added support in Firefox for the above-described DNT header, but didn't present a solution to the whole problem of how to get third parties to bother honoring DNT. The W3C has its own working groups for DNT policies, but by its own admission they are not regulators, and cannot penalize anyone for noncompliance with any standard they might draft.

Microsoft--in a move that could either be seen as insightful or merely contrary--came up with a solution via its own no-tracking technology, called Tracking Protection Lists. Lists of third parties that might be tracking you are maintained and used by the browser (Microsoft has implemented TPL in Internet Explorer 9), and can be blocked automatically by the user. That makes it more immediately useful than the DNT header, as DNT can simply be ignored. But it also requires that the block lists be kept up-to-date, and it forces the user to either be dependent on someone else's block lists or cobble them together himself.

Google had its own solution for Chrome called Keep My Opt-Outs, which persistently stores a user's preferences to selectively opt out of ad tracking even if they delete cookies from their browser. Google claimed this provided a good balance between what advertisers and what users wanted--more or less the position you'd expect from a company that has a foot in both the browser and advertising markets.

So now that there's talk of making DNT mandatory, how is it to be implemented? From what we can tell, it's entirely up to the browser maker how a DNT button would operate.

Given the divergence of opinions between Google, Mozilla, and Microsoft alone on that issue, all this seems likely to do is shift the burden of managing privacy that much more onto the user. If a user expects one kind of privacy-preserving behavior in Chrome, and then get a completely different (or even nonexistent) one in Firefox, that's a problem.

Because the actual details are a long way from being delivered to the end user (Google, for instance, is to release its DNT-button-endowed edition of Chrome by the end of the year), any user who wants to opt out of tracking needs to get in the habit of doing it herself. The tools to accomplish this already exist: IE's TPL, or third-party add-ons such as Ghostery, which lets you see and block ad companies that are following you on a given page.

In short, it's best to assume that until the details are more concrete, and maybe even after that as well, you're better off taking the protection of your privacy into your own hands.

2 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Server Market Splitsville
Server Market Splitsville
Just because the server market's in the doldrums doesn't mean innovation has ceased. Far from it -- server technology is enjoying the biggest renaissance since the dawn of x86 systems. But the primary driver is now service providers, not enterprises.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Top IT Trends to Watch in Financial Services
IT pros at banks, investment houses, insurance companies, and other financial services organizations are focused on a range of issues, from peer-to-peer lending to cybersecurity to performance, agility, and compliance. It all matters.
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.