Does The Press Make Too Much Of Security Warnings?
By publishing a blizzard of security bulletins and patches, are we providing useful information for users, or are just being pawns in a public-relations war between Microsoft and its competitors?
"No news is good news" is a saying that Microsoft probably has pinned to its front door. It seems that not a day goes by that some security advisory firm or other announces that a new vulnerability has been found in a Microsoft product. Until recently, that is. In the last few weeks, Firefox and Mozilla have -- not surprisingly -- become the focus of attention as well.
To tell you the truth, whenever I read another article that lists the latest flaws in a piece of popular software, I'm of two minds. On the one hand, I'm very glad that, if there was a weakness that could be exploited by malware, it was discovered by an analyst -- and, by extension, the software manufacturer -- before somebody with unpleasant intentions made use of it. If the good guys get there first, the vulnerability will presumably be fixed, and we'll all be safer.
However, there is a niggling voice in the back of my head that speculates about how serious many of these flaws are -- and how much good is done by trumpeting their existence every time another one is discovered. Are we being given important information -- or just becoming part of a public relations war between Microsoft, its competitors, and a small cadre of analysts? (Of course, as soon as that voice makes itself heard, the first one starts to yell, "Are you nuts? Of course we want to know about any flaws in our software! How else can we make sure that the manufacturers will fix their mistakes?" Things can get very interesting inside my head.)
I'm also starting to wonder if, like the Department of Homeland Security, we shouldn't simply start offering colors as indicators of how many threats have been announced in any week, and how severe they were. For example, Yellow can mean a few minor back door cracks were caught and easily handled; Orange can mean that six unpatched vulnerabilities were found in Windows XP Service Pack 2; and Red could mean that Bill Gates was seen surreptitiously buying a Mac mini.
Anyway, here are some of the more recent announcements, in case you're keeping track:
IT's Reputation: What the Data SaysInformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
What The Business Really Thinks Of IT: 3 Hard TruthsThey say perception is reality. If so, many in-house IT departments have reason to worry. InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. The news isn't great.
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.