Government // Enterprise Architecture
Commentary
7/7/2011
08:17 AM
Dan Keldsen
Dan Keldsen
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Enterprise 2.0 Innovators Must Bridge To The Laggards

If you're feeling frustrated that your boss, your executives, your peers aren't "getting it," it's not them; it's you.

Rob Preston's recent column "Language Of Social Sounds Too Soft To Business" rings true to my own experiences over the years, but I'd like to dive a bit deeper.

Who does social sound soft to? Why is that? And how do you get past skepticism into useful action?

Social sounds soft to a certain segment of businesspeople, not to all businesspeople. That's an important distinction.

For better or worse, that slice of the business crowd that doesn't (yet) "get" the value of social business is a barrier that needs to be addressed. It's not about "more collaboration" or "more social" or "more innovation"--that's far too soft for most people to wrap their heads around. What does more or better of any of those concepts actually do for companies?

In many ways, the conversations seem to have stalled out in Enterprise 2.0 circles. Lots of noise, but not much forward motion, or at least no consistent motion across the board. Here's a sampling of what I heard at last month's Enterprise 2.0 conference in Boston:

"Our executive management just doesn't get it."

"It's not about the tools. It's about culture."

"It's not about culture. It's about adoption."

"It's not about features. It's about the environment."

"We already bought SharePoint. Can't we just 'do social' with that?"

"Activity streams are the wave of the future."

"The ROI of email never had to be quantified. Why should we have to give social business an ROI?"

The language used to talk about what Enterprise 2.0 is and what it can do for you (or your team, your company, your customers, your partners) is going to need to change as we move from talking in general terms--at the beginning of a new market or genesis of a new idea--to very specific impacts and reasons.

Maturity Required

Just as there's no magic bullet solution for Enterprise 2.0 (period), there's plenty of room for different approaches, and reasons for using them.

The early innovators in any market are by default going to be the ones most open to interpreting how the latest tool/concept can fit into their world. In VIEW terminology (an assessment of problem-solving and decision-making style), these are the Explorers--those not afraid to map out new territory by running around and making it up as they go along. This is a rare mindset, and if this is where you live (as I do), it's extremely important to keep in mind that most people are absolutely not Explorers.

As the rest of the market catches up, more and more "evidence" needs to be provided for those who need an explicit connection between a solution and a problem. These tend to be Developers (in VIEW language), who take much shorter steps and want plans, maps, and methodologies laid out in front of them.

Between Explorers and Developers is the big hump of the bell curve, with people who are sometimes one extreme or the other and need guidance to connect to the extremes. The early innovators/evangelists see solutions and can connect them to problems that are otherwise hidden to others. The laggards--or mainstream--frequently don't see the problems, buried under the surface of something larger and more obvious. And they see the solutions as too vague and soft because those solutions are coming from a "new paradigm" that seems like too much of a leap from their comfortable, sometimes obsolete, way of doing things.

As I tweeted (in frustration) from the Enterprise 2.0 conference keynote audience: "Folks, we don't have to change the entire world--make progress and make noise about it!"

We can't get there from here unless we realize that people and organizations are coming from different perspectives. There's no single way to go about making change happen, which may be frustrating but is simply reality.

Be The Bridge

So if you're feeling frustrated that your boss, your executives, your peers aren't "getting it," it's not them; it's you. That is, bridging the gap is up to YOU. Listen to their concerns and what they're saying NO! to.

Buried in every argument is some path to a mini-yes, and your mission is to build a bridge of mini-yeses from where they are now (business as usual) to putting Enterprise 2.0 into full swing. Before you know it, you will have built the bridge into the future and can laugh about the way things used to be.

Or you can just wallow in despair.

Dan Keldsen is the chief innovation officer at Information Architected Inc. (IAI), providing analysis, consulting, and workshops on Enterprise 2.0/social business and distributed convergence based on nearly 20 years of work as an analyst and consultant.

IT is caught in a squeeze between requests for new applications, services, and device support and demands from upper management to keep budgets lean, staffing light, and operations tight. These are irreconcilable objectives as long as we spend the vast majority of our resources on legacy services. Read our report now. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
dankeldsen
50%
50%
dankeldsen,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/20/2011 | 9:35:38 PM
re: Enterprise 2.0 Innovators Must Bridge To The Laggards
Deb - Apologies, I just caught your comments.

Spitting in the ocean is a great metaphor.

People who want to make this change happen need to be the bridge. Find the things that actually cause their boss, manager, colleague, etc. real pain on a daily basis, and find the tie to why E2.0 or anything else would be an easy solution.

The visionaries/innovators/evangelists who "get it" early are part of a rare breed that can see the possibilities, while others have to be explicitly shown a REAL benefit.

We're getting there, but there's a reason why so many concepts, industries, solutions fall into the chasm. It takes work!

Dan
Deb Donston-Miller
50%
50%
Deb Donston-Miller,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/15/2011 | 6:33:12 PM
re: Enterprise 2.0 Innovators Must Bridge To The Laggards
I think what's truly frustrating for the Social Networking Explorers (to paraphrase your parlance) is that no matter how committed and evangelistic you are, you can't go it alone. (I call it the spitting into the ocean effect.) The beauty and the challenge of social networking is that you need, in my opinion, significant engagement among stakeholders before you see any kind of real benefit. That engagement can be difficult to gain as people often have to step outside of their comfort zones. Back in the early days of the Web, Amazon became the poster child for e-commerce success. I wonder if there will be (or is there one) an equivalent in the social networking realm?

Deb Donston-Miller
Contributing Editor, The BrainYard
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - August 27, 2014
Who wins in cloud price wars? Short answer: not IT. Enterprises don't want bare-bones IaaS. Providers must focus on support, not undercutting rivals.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Howard Marks talks about steps to take in choosing the right cloud storage solutions for your IT problems
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.