Government // Enterprise Architecture
Commentary
2/17/2009
11:18 AM
Serdar Yegulalp
Serdar Yegulalp
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Gap Insurance' For Open Source

Over at Forbes.com I spied an article with the intriguing title "The Open-Source Collaboration Gap," which delves into the whole question of why the vast majority of contributions to open source projects come from individuals and not companies or institutions. Two questions came to my lips: 1) Is that the case? and 2) If so, why?

Over at Forbes.com I spied an article with the intriguing title "The Open-Source Collaboration Gap," which delves into the whole question of why the vast majority of contributions to open source projects come from individuals and not companies or institutions. Two questions came to my lips: 1) Is that the case? and 2) If so, why?

Question #1 is in fact addressed in the article, based on conversations with folks who ran both commercial projects (Alfresco) and nonprofit ones (Eclipse). Both of them reported that far more individual than institutional users committed changes to their projects.

The reason for this was because the groups were often more interested in providing functionality that supported something they needed as a group rather than something an individual might want. Also, when you are part of a group, you're committing on behalf of the whole group, not just yourself. It's far easier to do that sort of thing when it's just you -- easier, even if doesn't always yield the breadth of results possible from having many hands at work.

What I'd like to see where possible is more companies setting up open source "incubators" that serve a dual purpose: to allow those in the incubator to contribute back changes both in an individual, maverick way and on behalf of the company as a whole. The time and resources they'd spend on each of these things would be negotiable, but by doing this they could enjoy the flexibility of being individual and corporate contributors in the same breath.

I doubt there's any one model for how this could work -- they could be a formal subdivision of the company, or a fully sponsored offshoot like Eclipse, depending on the scope of their involvement and their own inclinations. But having something of this variety is shaping up to be the latest version of, say, having a CIO at all.

The more you use open source, the greater your chances of giving back in some form -- and the more you give back, the better your chances of finding yourself in a position where you'll be able to shape what you use for the better instead of just consuming it.


Each year, InformationWeek honors the nation's 500 most innovative users of business technology. Companies with $250 million or more in revenue are invited to apply for the 2009 InformationWeek 500.


Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014
Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.