News
News
4/10/2007
03:54 PM
50%
50%

Entertainment Groups Claim Pretexting Ban Will Hinder Piracy Probes

The RIAA and MPAA raise concerns over California's attempts to broaden the federal law.

California's proposed law to extend a federal ban on pretexting is receiving harsh criticism from various Hollywood entertainment groups that claim the legislation would "gut" their ability to investigate piracy.

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) was among several industry groups opposing the legislation Tuesday during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on pretexting. The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the Direct Marketing Association and the California Chamber of Commerce also oppose the bill, which would prohibit people from using false identities and other ruses to gain personal information.

"To be clear: RIAA never assumes the identity of a consumer or other individual to gain access to personal information about that customer or individual in the course of an investigation and we don't condone such activities," an RIAA spokesperson explained in an e-mail.

"Understandably, however, these individuals don't identify themselves as RIAA investigators when trying to buy counterfeit CD or gathering information on a pirate operation either. To do so, would obviously defeat the effort from the onset."

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB) prohibits pretexting to gain personal financial information. Earlier this year, President George W. Bush signed a federal pretexting bill into law. That law --called Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006 -- allows fined and imprisonment for fraudulently obtaining phone records.

Democratic Senator Ellen Corbett introduced Senate Bill 328, broadens prohibitions on the federal legislation and would prohibit people from using impersonation, fictitious or fraudulent statements and false representations to obtain personal information. The bill makes exceptions for law enforcement as well as companies investigating their own employees and for internal security purposes.

Businesses that engage prohibiting pretexting would be subject to civil litigation and customers would be entitled to $500 per violation, up to $3,000.

The RIAA is suggesting an amendment which would allow investigators to hide their identities through ruses, gain trust of those engaged in piracy and protect intellectual property rights.

The issue of pretexting gained national attention when Hewlett-Packard was accused of deceiving to obtain private records to find out which members of its board where leaking private company information to the media.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 7, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program!
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.