Ex-Qwest CEO Nacchio Seeks To Overturn Insider Trading Conviction
Nacchio's defense attorneys argued that the trial judge kept a law professor from testifying on Nacchio's behalf during the jury trial.
A three-judge panel hearing an appeal by former Qwest Communications chief executive Joe Nacchio zeroed in on a decision by a trial judge to effectively block a law professor from testifying on Nacchio's behalf.
Fighting Nacchio's six-year prison sentence and $52 million fine, Nacchio's attorneys argued on his behalf Tuesday in the 10th U.S. Circuit in Denver. According to media reports, the judges also queried defense and prosecuting attorneys on the importance of alleged insider information that Nacchio had. Nacchio, who was Qwest's chief executive from 1997 to 2002, did not attend the hearing.
Nacchio sold Qwest stock at high prices before it plunged and he was charged with withholding information on the company's weakening finances until he had sold stock.
Nacchio's defense attorneys argued that trial judge Edward Nottingham effectively kept law professor Daniel Fischel from testifying on Nacchio's behalf during the jury trial in which the executive was convicted. Nacchio's attorneys also maintained that Judge Nottingham's instructions to the jury were wrong.
Prosecutor Stephen Oestreicher countered at Tuesday's hearing that Nacchio had a "golden rule" against saying anything that would damage Qwest's stock price. Throughout the case, prosecutors have argued that Nacchio withheld information that would damage Qwest's stock price while he was selling his stock.
Nacchio and additional former Qwest executives still face a civil lawsuit charging them with improperly reporting billions in revenue; the civil case was filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?