Experts Tell Congress U.S. E-Voting Security Is Flawed - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
News
News
7/19/2006
02:07 PM
50%
50%
RELATED EVENTS
Moving UEBA Beyond the Ground Floor
Sep 20, 2017
This webinar will provide the details you need about UEBA so you can make the decisions on how bes ...Read More>>

Experts Tell Congress U.S. E-Voting Security Is Flawed

Security experts expressed "grave reservations" about the current state of electronic voting and offered a list of steps Congress should take to ensure an accurate and secure system.

WASHINGTON — Security experts told Congress on Wednesday (July 19) that the federal qualification process for electronic voting machines is flawed.

"We have grave reservations about the safeguards in place with many of the computerized voting technologies being used," Eugene Spafford, chairman of the Association for Computing Machinery's Committee on Public Policy.

"New federal standards and a certification process hold promise for addressing some of these problems, but more must be done to ensure the integrity of our elections in the face of software and hardware errors as well as the possibility of undetectable tampering," Spafford told a joint House hearing.

David Wagner, an associate professor at the University of California at Berkeley and a specialist in information security and electronic voting, went further. "We've seen security defects that allow a single person with insider access and some technical knowledge could switch votes, perhaps undetected, and potentially swing an election," he testified. "These problems should be weeded out by the independent testing process, but it is clear that this system isn't working."

The House hearing considered whether voluntary U.S. standards for voting equipment issued in 2005 are sufficient to improve voting machine security. A recent Government Accounting Office report found inconsistent application of the federal specs.

Spafford also released a list of steps to ensure accurate and secure voting. They include:

  • A more transparent testing process with results made available to the public.

  • Clear security standards to minimize the number of designs.

  • A mechanism for periodic security updates to counter emerging threats.

  • Voter-verified paper trials to mitigate the risks of flawed software and hardware.

    Many states, counties and municipalities have moved to touch-screen displays to record votes. Critics have complained that ballots and vote counts can be tampered with before election results are certified.

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
    How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
    To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
    Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
    White Papers
    Current Issue
    IT Strategies to Conquer the Cloud
    Chances are your organization is adopting cloud computing in one way or another -- or in multiple ways. Understanding the skills you need and how cloud affects IT operations and networking will help you adapt.
    Video
    Slideshows
    Twitter Feed
    Sponsored Live Streaming Video
    Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
    Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
    Flash Poll