Commentary

Why IT Outsourcing Often Fails

Jim Ditmore

IT doesn't compare to a security guard force or a legal staff. It's part of your core intellectual property.

While the general trend of more IT outsourcing (via smaller, more focused deals) continues, these engagements remain difficult to navigate. Every large IT shop that I have turned around had significant problems caused or made worse by the outsourcing arrangement, particularly large deals. While those shops performed poorly for other reasons (ineffectual leadership, process failures, talent issues), improving performance required a substantial revamp or reversal of the outsourcing arrangements.

Failed outsourcing deals, involving reputable vendors and customers, litter various industries. While formal statistics are hard to come by, in part because companies are loathe to report their failures publicly, my estimate is that at least 25% and possibly more than half of these deals fail or perform very poorly. Why do these failures occur? And what should you do to improve the probability of success?


More Global CIO Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Much depends on what you choose to outsource and how you manage the vendor and service. A common misconception is that any activity that's not "core" to a company can and should be outsourced. In The Discipline of Market Leaders, authors Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema argued that market leaders must recognize their competency in one of three areas: product and innovation leadership, customer service and intimacy, or operational excellence. They shouldn't try to excel at all three areas.

However, IT is critical to all three areas. And because of this intrinsic linkage, IT isn't like a security guard force or a legal staff, two areas companies commonly outsource successfully. And by outsourcing intrinsic capabilities, companies put their core competency at risk.

A recent University of Utah business school article found significantly higher rates of failure at companies that had outsourced IT and other operations. The authors concluded that "companies need to retain adequate control over specialized components that differentiate their products or have unique interdependencies, or they are more likely to fail to survive."

Global CIO
Global CIOs: A Site Just For You
Visit InformationWeek's Global CIO -- our online community and information resource for CIOs operating in the global economy.

My IT best practice: Companies must control their critical intellectual property. If your company uses outsourcing vendors to develop and deliver key features or services that differentiate its products and define its success, then those vendors can typically turn around and sell those advances to your competitors. Or you are putting your success in the hands of someone with very different goals. Be wary of those who say IT isn't a core competency. With every year that passes, there's more IT content in products in nearly every industry.

Choose instead to outsource those activities where you don't have scale or cost advantages, or capacity or competence. But ensure that you either retain or build the key design, integration, and management capabilities in-house.

Page 2:  Cost Savings?
 1 | 2  | Next Page » 

Related Reading


Informationweek Discussions

Start the Discussion


InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links