News
Commentary
12/19/2007
00:00 AM
Irwin Lazar
Irwin Lazar
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Googles's 'Knol': A new twist on group knowledge

This week Google announced plans for the “knoll project”, a site designed to allow individuals to share the knowledge they possess on a particular topic.  A “knoll” in Google-speak is a unit of knowledge.  But as Google moves forward with this plan, it begs the question “don’t we already have Wikipedia?”

Google’s tool differs from Wikipedia in a few key areas.  First, contributions are by invitation only (at least for now).  Google hopes that those with specific expertise in a particular area will contribute a written article sharing their knowledge.  Unlike a Wiki, where a group of individuals collectively builds and maintains a data repository, knol is meant to be more of an individual effort, highlighting authors.  Google argues that assigning an author’s name to a particular document will improve credibility and help users find quality sources of information.

Google hopes to leverage the social networking community to rate, comment, on, and contribute additional information to knols, again blurring the line between the knol project and Wikipedia.  And since it’s Google, authors will be able to include ads in their knols and profit from clicks.

In my mind the problem with the Google knol project is that it starts with a centralized model and then hopes the community will help shape development.  Contrast that with Wikipedia which relies on the open community to create and police content, only stepping in when controversies or other situations warrant.  

To me, the Google knol project sounds like a management nightmare.  Who will certify that knol submissions are accurate?  Who will vet authors?   Perhaps a more accurate comparison of the Google knol project isn’t with Wikipedia, but with About.com, which offers a very similar model, using public subject matter experts to maintain data repositories for a variety of subjects.  If knol is simply reinventing what already exists, what is the point other than to draw people away from the other sites into an environment where they will be subject to Google ads?

Hmmm…will Google accept a knol on the merits of using open social communities to build information repositories versus a closed, centralized model?

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Government Oct. 20, 2014
Energy and weather agencies are busting long-held barriers to analyzing big data. Can the feds now get other government agencies into the movement?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and trends on InformationWeek.com
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.