Government // Cloud computing
Commentary
12/30/2013
09:45 AM
Daniel P. Kent
Daniel P. Kent
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail

Software-Defined Networking Rises Above The Hype

SDN earned plenty of hype in 2013, but the ability to program networks improves network performance and security in a more systematic and automatic fashion.

(Source: Wikipedia Commons)
(Source: Wikipedia Commons)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
jgherbert
IW Pick
100%
0%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
12/30/2013 | 12:21:16 PM
Has SDN Risen Above The Hype?
Side note - amusing to see the library image of a ProCurve switch to illustrate this article written by Cisco Federal's CTO :-)

 

There are precious few companies out there with a fully operating end to end SDN solution that provide not only the theoretical capability to manage the network in the way that's promised, but actually have the controllers and the front end interface to allow such control to take place. Even Cisco - since it seems relevant - while launching Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) during 2013, is not shipping the ACI-enabled hardware until 2014. I'm skeptical about the ability, at the moment, of technologies like OpenFlow to scale to the extent required to actually control new flows in a busy network in real time, as promised.

 

I'm not sure therefore that the case here has been proven - as suggested by the article's title - that SDN has risen above the hype. Don't get me wrong - I believe strongly in SDN - but we are still in reality thriving on slideware for many of the claimed capabilities. Certainly this article talks a lot about what will be, and raises hypotheticals for what might be, and how SDN could help. What's missing here, and in many other places, is a rubber-meets-the-road demonstration of these amazing automated capabilities actually running in real time 

 

My feeling is in the shorter term at least, we'll see more of a hybrid approach with default capabilities built in, with SDN overriding for specific flows, but perhaps not as real time as we'd like to claim - more pre-determined by the business. Still, let's see - prove me wrong, vendors!
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
1/1/2014 | 10:52:28 AM
Re: Has SDN Risen Above The Hype?
I'm excited about the prospect of software defined networking. There are a lot of things you can do to customize a network in the traditional sense, and SDN is just going to open that up some more. This is going to create a degree of disruption in terms of network engineering, but I don't think over the long-term that is going to be a major issue. SDN may end up being a weapon to better thwart hackers in the end. 
Susan Fogarty
50%
50%
Susan Fogarty,
User Rank: Author
1/2/2014 | 11:54:36 AM
Re: Has SDN Risen Above The Hype?
I have to agree with jgherbert's first comment on this piece -- while SDN certainly offers a great deal of potential to improve network performance and security, as of yet it is still a concept that remains unproven for the average business. And Cisco is further behind the pack in offering its customers any practical way to actually inplement SDN, so rather than vague assurances I would really like to see some detailed pilot projects and case studies rolling out.

LOL on the ProCurve photo -- you have an eagle eye! We are an equal opportunity publisher here at InformationWeek :)
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Author
12/30/2013 | 2:18:50 PM
Who make the best scalable SDN?
Good comment, jgherbert. Talking about the potential of SDN and implementing it are two different things. Interesting to see the CTO of Cisco's federal unit take such a forthright stance on the future value of SDN. Seems like we'd seen some foot-dragging in the past, with lots of talk about Dynamic Fabric Automation or Extensible Network Controller or CiscoONE instead of SDN. Is the future question, who will best make SDN scale?

See Greg Ferro's "Cisco's SDN Strategy: Four Critical Questions" also: 

http://www.informationweek.com/infrastructure/cloud-infrastructure/ciscos-sdn-strategy-4-critical-questions/d/d-id/1113226    
jgherbert
50%
50%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
12/30/2013 | 2:56:19 PM
Re: Who make the best scalable SDN?
Great question @cbabcock - who will be able to make it scale? One of the things that scares me about the move to a centralized real-time controller (in a dynamic OpenFlow-controlled network) is the dependence that this puts on the controller. As it stands yes, it is inefficient to have a complex distributed controll system effectively embedded in every router and switch, and there's an obvious efficiency to centralizing that function. That centralized resource had better be super high capacity and exceptionally resilient, or things are going to be very unpleasant across the network. What happens when you have a DDoS on an edge device? Will the controller get overloaded and impact internal flows? Oh right, we should have separate controllers for edge and core, most likely. I wonder where that stops - should we have multiple resiliency domains (and thus controllers) within each DC? Now that I have mutliple controllers, do I now need another conrtroller above those to push poilicies down?
asksqn
50%
50%
asksqn,
User Rank: Ninja
12/31/2013 | 2:35:23 AM
SDN: NSAs wildest fantasy yet?
I have to wonder about the implications/ramifications of SDN given that with each passing Snowden revelation Americans find out that the NSA has not only been listening in on communicstions wholesale, but also intercepting laptops ordered online and installing malware to enable backdoors upon setup/configuration of the OS. Will SDN developers also lie down for the NSA and build in backdoors?
jgherbert
50%
50%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
12/31/2013 | 9:32:05 AM
Re: SDN: NSAs wildest fantasy yet?
@asksqn: Interesting thought. Given that we've long had Cisco's "lawful intercept" IOS feature set, why would SDN vendors be any different from the hardware vendors in terms of risk of back doors? I mean, bear in mind that a few years ago it was claimed that many service provider IOS boxes had been root-kitted by malicious folks (we assume; maybe by other organizations), it may not be much of a change after all.

If anything, if you move towards a white box model and open source protocols and software, you may have more visibility into what the software can do than you would with a pre-packaged solution of any sort.
Cloud Adoption: Time to Run
Cloud Adoption: Time to Run
Federal agencies embraced “Cloud First” faster than many ¬expected. But early adopters are now hitting challenges. Here’s how to move beyond obstacles and reach maturity.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Elite 100 - 2014
Our InformationWeek Elite 100 issue -- our 26th ranking of technology innovators -- shines a spotlight on businesses that are succeeding because of their digital strategies. We take a close at look at the top five companies in this year's ranking and the eight winners of our Business Innovation awards, and offer 20 great ideas that you can use in your company. We also provide a ranked list of our Elite 100 innovators.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.