Cloud Security, Costs Concern Federal IT Pros
As White House continues to push cloud computing, federal IT managers still worry about security and costs, Ponemon survey finds.
According to the survey by research group the Ponemon Institute, 91% of federal IT workers are either somewhat or very familiar with the Office of Management and Budget's Cloud First initiative, but 69% believe that the initiative's requirement to move three services to the cloud over 18 months is too fast. In fact, 71% of respondents said that pressure to move to the cloud creates security risks for their organizations.
More Government Insights
- Building a Hybrid Cloud in Government: It's not that Complicated
- The ABC's of Cloud Computing in the Midmarket
- Bloomberg BusinessWeek Agility for Differentiation
- Mobile Data Center Brings the Mobile Cloud to Life: Portable, Mobile Data Centers Aligned with Army Operations
- Research: Federal Government Cloud Computing Survey
- SaaS 2011: Adoption Soars, Yet Deployment Concerns Linger
Federal CIO Steve VanRoekel and his predecessor Vivek Kundra have been strong advocates of the government's move to cloud computing throughout the Obama administration. Numerous efforts, including Cloud First and the FedRAMP security authorization initiative, have been set up to help accelerate that move.
Even beyond the worry that pressure to accelerate deployment increases risks, however, cloud security remains a major concern for federal IT pros. The survey indicated that 54% of federal IT workers are not confident about their cloud service providers' ability to provide sufficient data protection and security, but more IT pros believe their agency--rather than providers--should be the most responsible for cloud security.
[ Find out how government CIOs are transitioning to the cloud. See Federal Cloud Strategy: 10 Case Studies. ]
Fewer than half of federal IT pros say that their cloud service providers are fully compliant with the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), which governs federal agencies' cybersecurity requirements, and fewer than a quarter say they are just as secure as on-premises IT services.
Almost half of the IT workers surveyed believe that insider threats and vulnerabilities were more prominent in the cloud than in on-premises environments--more than believe that unauthorized public disclosure was more likely in the cloud. In all, 54% say it is either very likely or likely that their organizations will suffer a security breach over the next year due to an insecure cloud provider.
According to the survey, IT pros think that the most important physical security step cloud service providers can take is to locate their servers within the United States, followed by isolating government data from other data, and requiring background checks for data center workers and others who have access to government agencies' services. However, 62% of pros said they are not confident that their organizations know all the privileged users who had access to their cloud providers' servers and storage devices.
In addition to security, IT pros are also not sold on cloud computing's cost benefits, according to the survey. In fact, more IT pros believed that the long-term costs of cloud computing will be more expensive than traditional IT than those who believed that long-term costs would go down. That contrasts with non-IT workers surveyed by Ponemon, who believed costs would decrease thanks to cloud computing. That disconnect could be the reason why 65% of IT pros say that they're not confident their organization understands the true long-term costs of migrating to the cloud.
How 10 federal agencies are tapping the power of cloud computing--without compromising security. Also in the new, all-digital InformationWeek Government supplement: To judge the success of the OMB's IT reform efforts, we need concrete numbers on cost savings and returns. Download our Cloud In Action issue of InformationWeek Government now. (Free registration required.)