Government // Leadership
Commentary
7/22/2014
09:06 AM
Linda Cureton
Linda Cureton
Commentary
Connect Directly
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

3 Reasons We Don't Need Federal CIOs

Former NASA CIO muses on the futility of the federal CIO role -- and offers insight on how it needs to change.

solutions. Programs with money have little pressure to economize; programs without money are left struggling to find the resources to perform their jobs. The organization is polarized into the "haves" and the "have-nots." They believe that IT security is a CIO problem, not a mission problem. They will not understand the words that are coming out of the mouth of the CIO. They will spend more on IT than their peers and get less value.

When we consider the proliferation of duplicate and redundant infrastructure, it's clear that the words coming out of the mouths of CIOs sound more like, "blah, blah, blah." The agency thus has the infrastructure they deserve and the CIO they need -- none.

3. Federal CIOs are not empowered to make strategic decisions about mission-related IT
Being a federal CIO in Washington, D.C. means that you are put on a pedestal and treated like a demigod. You are an in-demand speaker who is received affectionately and with applause. You are sought out for sound-bites by journalists with deadlines. You and the pantheon of others preceding and following you are charming, smart, and savvy. The attention and praise is intoxicating.

Then you sober up and go back to the federal C-suite.

Sure, you have a seat at the table, but you're treated like a child who has to sit with the adults because the kids' table is full. You are to be seen and not heard -- and by all means, don't interrupt the adults while they are talking.

This is the source of job dissatisfaction and frustration quietly tolerated in the federal CIO community. The Government Accounting Office (GAO) acknowledges in GAO-11-634 Federal Chief Information Officers: Opportunities Exist to Improve Role in Information Technology Management that this frustration leads to high stress levels and job turnover.

Certainly CIOs have gotten a lot of "help" from both the Executive branch (e.g., OMB M-11-29 Chief Information Officer Authorities) and the Legislative branch (e.g., the Clinger-Cohen Act and its sequel, the Federal Information Technology Reform Act). However, this "help" consistently fails to get to the root cause of chronic federal problems.

CIOs lack the authority they need budgetarily, politically, and organizationally. They lack the necessary resources and workforce. Unless the root cause of this problem is unearthed and resolved, sitting CIOs are only marginally more effective than no CIO at all.

How do we get out of this mess?
Maybe the problem is too difficult to solve -- but it's worth trying to find ways to improve the situation and enable more effective CIOs throughout government.

It's time for "thoughtful compliance" at OMB, acknowledging that the government is not a single enterprise. Nor are we thousands of enterprises -- the truth lies somewhere in between. Finding that sweet spot will require more thoughtful mission-inspired consideration.

Next, we need more IT-savvy departmental leadership in both the political and career ranks of the executive echelons. Consistent with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) specifications, this senior executive has a strong business acumen and keeps up-to-date on technological developments. Makes effective use of technology to achieve results. Ensures access to and security of technology systems. An agency with IT-savvy leaders and a business-savvy CIO would be extremely successful.

Finally, it may be too much to ask that the industry media and government industry organizations balance the need to attract readers and members with making false idols out of CIOs. However, it will take a community -- Congress, OMB, Agency heads, media, and industry organizations, along with CIOs who are highly emotionally intelligent, humble, business-savvy, and influential to truly make a difference.

InformationWeek's June Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of big data. Find out one CIO's take on what's driving big data, key points on platform considerations, why a recent White House report on the topic has earned praise and skepticism, and much more.

Linda Cureton is the former CIO of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and is now CEO of Muse Technologies, Inc., specializing in IT transformation. Her company helps organizations develop strong leadership, technology solutions, and program management ... View Full Bio
Previous
2 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Andre Leonard
50%
50%
Andre Leonard,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/28/2014 | 2:42:16 PM
Re: Spot on article
Linda, I sense a smart, honest and intelligent woman. Please don't waste your innovation, time or talent working for government. There is a reason they are always a day late, a dollar short and always over budget. 

Andre,
LindaC873
100%
0%
LindaC873,
User Rank: Strategist
7/28/2014 | 2:29:10 PM
Re: Spot on article
You are so right, @Andre.  

As a CIO at NASA, I visited the ground station for the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite Systems.  This critical national infrastructure is essential for space communications -- yet, the heroes and she-roes supporting the critical capability is forced to keep it available and operational with a maintenance budget that is paultry.  

They often resort to soldering guns, duct tape, and e-Bay to provide the means to maintain this national treasure.  Every year, during the budget cycle, I ask ... why is this ok?  

I never got an answer.  But perhaps the answer is -- it's ok because it's government.
LindaC873
100%
0%
LindaC873,
User Rank: Strategist
7/28/2014 | 2:17:43 PM
Re: Is the federal CIO job really this bad?
@David, if it was an exaggerations, why are we talking about FITARA?  Why wasn't Clinger-Cohen enough? What's broken and are we fixing it?
LindaC873
50%
50%
LindaC873,
User Rank: Strategist
7/28/2014 | 2:11:45 PM
Re: What's the proper role of OMB?
I'm a big fan of the Open Data initiative.  I believe that it will be the source of some great innovations relative to what we can do with unfettered data.  OMB and OSTP should be commended for the positive outcomes that we see from this initiatives.  

I think the current debacle of Federal IT is not solely the fault of any one branch of the government.  I believe that the "blame" is to be shared by OMB, the legislative branch, agencies, and some CIOs themselves.  

If I could use an analogy here --

OMB wants CIOs to paint masterpieces.  Yet, they provide guidance that is akin to "paint by numbers". Sure, you'll have a painting that represents "something" but it significantly misses the mark of greatness.  Inspector Generals want to make sure the CIO Artist stays in the lines; Congress wants to restrict how much paint can be used; and agencies what CIOs to guess what picture needs to be painted.  

In the end, all you get is a bunch of paint on a canvass and a mess of Federal IT.  
mshimamoto968
50%
50%
mshimamoto968,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/24/2014 | 2:49:34 PM
Re: Thank you Linda.
Linda, thank you for your commentary.  I agree with some of your comments and not with others.  First I'd like to say that the title CIO is a misnomer in my opinion.  Generally the people with the CIO title are IT architects, chief technologists, or mission support managers.  Very few are actually responsible for the development and management, other than data bases and web portals, of information.  When I was the PACOM J2 Intelligence IT architecture chief, I never considered myself as a CIO, although I did have the good fortune to be invited to the Federal CIO Summit for the last 2 years before I retired from Federal Civil Service.  The IT architecture is simply an enabler for the organization's mission, and in the case of Intelligence, it should enable what I consider to be the "vision" of Intelligence, i.e., to provide a "God's eye view and understanding" of what are and will be threats to our nation and people around the world.  So I think the 2 Gartner statements are just gobbledygook.  What the heck does "disruptive forces" mean?  Is that the negative of enabling technologies?  Should we still be using messengers on horseback to deliver hand-written correspondence?  Totally agree on your comments on compliance, enough said.  IT is not considered a strategic asset when the seniors don't see how it is a key enabler for their mission/business.  As I sat in the morning intelligence brief and staff meeting, my focus was on how IT could better enable the analysts and staff to both gain and produce better knowledge – that was key to being able to better execute the mission.  This approach resulted in both have a key voice on the staff and being tasked to support key strategic planning efforts.  "CIOs" being treated like children sitting at the "adult" table are probably just "talking IT" vice providing relevant approaches towards achieving the Director's vision, goals, and objectives.
mshimamoto968
100%
0%
mshimamoto968,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/24/2014 | 2:49:23 PM
Re: Thank you Linda.
Linda, thank you for your commentary.  I agree with some of your comments and not with others.  First I'd like to say that the title CIO is a misnomer in my opinion.  Generally the people with the CIO title are IT architects, chief technologists, or mission support managers.  Very few are actually responsible for the development and management, other than data bases and web portals, of information.  When I was the PACOM J2 Intelligence IT architecture chief, I never considered myself as a CIO, although I did have the good fortune to be invited to the Federal CIO Summit for the last 2 years before I retired from Federal Civil Service.  The IT architecture is simply an enabler for the organization's mission, and in the case of Intelligence, it should enable what I consider to be the "vision" of Intelligence, i.e., to provide a "God's eye view and understanding" of what are and will be threats to our nation and people around the world.  So I think the 2 Gartner statements are just gobbledygook.  What the heck does "disruptive forces" mean?  Is that the negative of enabling technologies?  Should we still be using messengers on horseback to deliver hand-written correspondence?  Totally agree on your comments on compliance, enough said.  IT is not considered a strategic asset when the seniors don't see how it is a key enabler for their mission/business.  As I sat in the morning intelligence brief and staff meeting, my focus was on how IT could better enable the analysts and staff to both gain and produce better knowledge – that was key to being able to better execute the mission.  This approach resulted in both have a key voice on the staff and being tasked to support key strategic planning efforts.  "CIOs" being treated like children sitting at the "adult" table are probably just "talking IT" vice providing relevant approaches towards achieving the Director's vision, goals, and objectives.
Mike Nesel
100%
0%
Mike Nesel,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/24/2014 | 12:16:05 PM
Thank you Linda.
Thanks for your insights Linda!   We enjoyed your visits, and wish you well in your endeavors!

 
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
7/23/2014 | 4:32:28 PM
Re: Corporate vs Mission and Control (or lack of it)
@Kimberly thanks for weighing in as a vet of GovIT. The situation worries me in terms of recruiting that next gen of GovIT talent -- and we really need those cybersecurity folks.
Andre Leonard
50%
50%
Andre Leonard,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/23/2014 | 1:22:47 PM
Spot on article
Linda Cureton, is to be commended for writing a very eloquent piece that exposes the shortcomings and lack of focus we see in government today. 

What we do know about government is, it follows, never leads. As such, it is always at least 20 years behind the times in everything. The term, a day late, a dolar short and in last place, could have very well been written for government.
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
7/23/2014 | 10:29:35 AM
Is the federal CIO job really this bad?
Is this an exaggeration, or is the mix of responsibilities and authority really this far out of whack?
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
2014 US Salary Survey: 10 Stats
2014 US Salary Survey: 10 Stats
InformationWeek surveyed 11,662 IT pros across 30 industries about their pay, benefits, job satisfaction, outsourcing, and more. Some of the results will surprise you.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 7, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program!
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.