Could Insurance Cover Your Next Fitness Band? - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Healthcare // Mobile & Wireless
News
4/15/2014
09:06 AM
50%
50%

Could Insurance Cover Your Next Fitness Band?

Consumers will sport almost 112 million wearables by 2018 -- most of them gadgets that track health-related metrics. Insurers have incentives to help the trend along.

Engage Patients: 16 Creative Healthcare Strategies
Engage Patients: 16 Creative Healthcare Strategies
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Wearable computers increasingly are becoming fashionable attire for consumers, especially fitness enthusiasts. It's a trend healthcare professionals can tap to improve patient and population health -- and that insurers might prove willing to pay for.

Consumers and businesses will buy more than 111.9 million wearable computer devices by 2018, a recent IDC report estimates. That's a compound annual growth rate of 78.4% from this year's anticipated sale of about 19 million units, according to the study, "Worldwide Wearable Computing Device 2014-2018 Forecast and Analysis."

"We see the overall market [spending] a billion dollars a year, just in wearables," said Chris Steel, who heads PA Consulting Group's Information Technology Consulting business in the US, in an interview. "There's a lot more to come in the actual treating of medical conditions, whether they're chronic or acute. And a lot of that is going to be driven by the payers themselves."

On the consumer side, purchasers have a dizzying -- and growing -- array of options, but the most popular category includes so-called "complex accessories." These gadgets operate semi-independently, but become fully operational when connected to a smartphone, tablet, or computer, says IDC. They include Fitbit, Nike+ FuelBand, and Jawbone Up, plus many newer entrants to the market.

[Read how one accountable care organization is weaning its members off old tech: Doctors Learn To Give Up Faxes.]

The second most popular category is "smart accessories" -- connected products to which users can add third-party apps to improve their overall health or exercise experience. This category will become the market leader within five years, said Ramon Llamas, research manager of mobile phones at IDC, in a statement.

Finally, IDC included smart wearables, such as Google Glass, in the study. These completely independent devices require only an Internet connection to operate and use third-party apps.

(Source: Fitbit)
(Source: Fitbit)

At least one report suggests fit and active people are not the only ones adopting health monitors. When wellness organization The Vitality Group conducted a five-year study of more than 300,000 patients, it found 63% of those who monitored their health and exercise via smartphone were overweight or obese. Almost 24% were 45 to 54 years old and about 9% were aged 55 to 64, the report showed.

At the end of the study, hospital costs dropped 6% for those who were inactive and became active. They fell 16% for participants who were active throughout the five years, compared with people who remained inactive, Vitality found.

Because wearable technologies improve patient health and reduce costs, insurance companies will advocate wearable adoption, PA Consulting's Steel says. In addition to encouraging patients to exercise and eat more healthily, wearables improve adherence to treatment, says Steel. "They want to get this sort of technology into the hands of members and providers to drive down costs. Many other payers are looking to move in that direction," he says. "I think healthcare is moving in the direction that wearables will really pay and have a significant impact in changing the way people think about their health and the way they pay to be insured."

One example: The recent acquisition by Optum, a UnitedHealth Group company, of Audax, developer of Zensey personal health monitoring and assessing apps.

As for which company might profit the most from the wearables craze, according to IDC's ConsumerScape 360° survey of 50,000 consumers worldwide, people trusted Samsung for wearables more than Apple, Sony, or Google.

Download Healthcare IT In The Obamacare Era, the InformationWeek Healthcare digital issue on changes driven by regulation. Modern technology created the opportunity to restructure the healthcare industry around accountable care organizations, but ACOs also put new demands on IT.

Alison Diana has written about technology and business for more than 20 years. She was editor, contributors, at Internet Evolution; editor-in-chief of 21st Century IT; and managing editor, sections, at CRN. She has also written for eWeek, Baseline Magazine, Redmond Channel ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Shane M. O'Neill
50%
50%
Shane M. O'Neill,
User Rank: Author
4/15/2014 | 3:48:49 PM
Re: Insurance companies should pay - but will they demand to see data?
If that's the case, I'll buy the damn fitband myself. My body, my data. The only people I'd want to see my activity data would be my trainer (if I had one) and my doctor.
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
4/15/2014 | 2:52:56 PM
Re: Insurance companies should pay - but will they demand to see data?
Once the health insurer buys the device, the insurer gets to track how many steps you take each day. There is a penalty possibility of course.
Kristin Burnham
50%
50%
Kristin Burnham,
User Rank: Author
4/15/2014 | 2:26:26 PM
Re: Insurance companies should pay - but will they demand to see data?
I wonder which people would prefer: Pay the $100 themselves for the device and keep their data private, or recoup the price in exchange for sharing their data with insurance companies (if that's what it came down to). Thoughts?
Shane M. O'Neill
50%
50%
Shane M. O'Neill,
User Rank: Author
4/15/2014 | 11:31:34 AM
Insurance companies should pay - but will they demand to see data?
Health insurance companies should step up and at least cover the costs of activity wristbands (around $100). It's an investment in the future that will pay off in healthier customers. The data point in this story I found most surprising (and encouraging) is that of 300,000 patients surveyed, 63% of those using who monitored their health and exercise via smartphone were overweight or obese. Shows that health wearables and apps are not exclusively for already-healthy fitness enthusiasts. Insurance companies should take note.

Where this gets tricky is if insurance companies ask to monitor the data generated by the apps/wristbands to justify their investment (they did, after all, pay for the damn things). Opens up a can of privacy issue worms.

 

 
Slideshows
Reflections on Tech in 2019
James M. Connolly, Editorial Director, InformationWeek and Network Computing,  12/9/2019
Slideshows
What Digital Transformation Is (And Isn't)
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/4/2019
Commentary
Watch Out for New Barriers to Faster Software Development
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  12/3/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll