Microsoft's move to sidestep the OASIS OpenDocument format (ODF) standard by making its own standards submission to the European ECMA standards body appears to contain 'bizarre restrictions' and are designed to give Microsoft 'complete control by tying products' together, IBM's standards chief said in an interview Friday.
Bob Sutor, IBM's vice president of standards and open source, said he expects ECMA to issue "a blessing" of Microsoft's submission. "I don't expect it to be a standards process," he said.
However, Sutor said he holds out hope that the two competing standards sides--OASIS and ECMA--could one day "converge" their approaches, if two standards are developed.
The formats issue over office software has been galvanized in recent months around a struggle in the Massachusetts state government. As things stand now, the state's Informational Technology division has stipulated that OASIS' ODF be the state's standard, beginning in 2007. Microsoft has challenged that position and has gathered important political and legislative support that is attempting to amend the IT ruling in Microsoft's favor. The pro-Microsoft officials have cited Microsoft's submission to ECMA as a way to challenge the ODF standard.
Sharp lines in the sand over the issue have been drawn, with IBM and Sun Microsystems favoring the OASIS standard while Microsoft has picked up its most influential support for its ECMA position from Apple Computer and Intel. Two co-chairs at the ECMA unit are Microsoft representatives. IBM has representatives at the European organization, but will not participate in the review of Microsoft's 1900-page-plus submission.
While the office software standards controversy has wallowed in arcane format details, the matter involves several billion dollars of annual profits. Microsoft is said to collect billions of dollars in annual profits alone from its popular office software.