Government // Big Data Analytics
Commentary
11/19/2013
09:05 AM
Kshemendra Paul
Kshemendra Paul
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
0%
100%

Information Sharing: Applying What We’ve Learned Since 9/11

The National Strategy for Information Sharing builds on the lessons learned since the 2001 terrorist attacks, but more needs to be done.

We have learned a lot about sharing information in the 12 years since the tragic events of September 11, 2001. The 9/11 Commission made several recommendations for improving information sharing, including the creation of the Information Sharing Environment and the national office responsible for fostering responsible information sharing among federal, state, and local government agencies, our partners in the private sector, and international entities. In the years that followed, the government has made tremendous progress improving information sharing. But the work is not finished.

We were reminded in April of the persistent threat of terrorism facing our nation when terrorists detonated two bombs at the Boston Marathon. The importance of strengthening information safeguards was put in stark relief a couple of months later after the unauthorized disclosure of classified information to the media. We are being cautioned daily of the importance of strengthening our cybersecurity posture, both as individuals and as institutions

Today, we are faced with many challenges: securing the Internet, countering violent extremism, improving information safeguarding, and protecting our critical infrastructure. The threat is evolving and dynamic, with growing linkage between cyber and physical modalities. The way forward must also be agile and rooted in extending current capabilities, emphasizing whole-of-society participation, collaboration, and accountability.

[Related: Information Sharing: Feds Cite Progress]

There was a watershed moment for responsible information sharing last December: the release of President Obama’s “National Strategy for Information Sharing and Safeguarding.” The strategy builds on past work and calls for “timely and effective sharing of intelligence and information about threats to our nation with those who need it, from the president to the police officer on the street.” 

The national strategy reinforces our commitment to prioritizing sharing and safeguarding together, including protections for privacy and other legal rights. The recently released Information Sharing Environment Annual Report to Congress provides a transparent assessment of progress and performance; gaps still to be addressed; an inventory of reusable tools and initiatives; and the way forward for implementing the strategy.

At the heart of the strategy is emphasis on developing, integrating, and maturing broad-based responsible information sharing capabilities supporting multiple common operating processes. These capabilities improve coordination of efforts, enabling faster and better decision making.

The goal is to prevent and reduce harm, strengthen preparedness and resilience, and improve response and recovery. These capabilities span communities of interest -- federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, their private sector partners, and international allies -- that share a need to collaborate. Taken together, these capabilities make up the distributed and decentralized Information Sharing Environment called for by the 9/11 Commission.

Traditionally, bureaucratic turf concerns, perceived legal barriers, variations in policies, uneven participation in standards development organizations, or agency-unique information technology has stymied progress. After 9/11, agencies rallied, resulting in impressive national-scale operational and information sharing innovations that save lives and money, with corresponding strengthening of protections for privacy and other rights.  A few examples:

  • The “National Network of Fusion Centers” provides support for information sharing across approximately 18,000 federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to address priority crimes and hazards. In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing, law enforcement officials affirmed that investments in communications equipment, training, and investigative resources contributed significantly to the identification and capture of the suspects.

  • The neighborhood watch for the nation based on the “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign and the nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) initiative integrate more than 300,000 front-line officers in our communities, manifesting the connection between homeland and hometown security. Those and other efforts gained added visibility with October being National Cybersecurity Awareness Month.

  • Frameworks such as the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) are enabling different agencies and domains of activity to align efforts to responsibly share information using common exchange standards developed under federated governance.

Information Sharing Environment capabilities are interoperable and support reuse due to the standards-based approach used to develop and specify common requirements and procure solutions. Use of the tools and initiatives that support the Information Sharing Environment reduces cost, lowers risk, improves shared situational awareness, and increases speed of collaboration and agility within and between communities of interest. These communities anchor on governance bodies and associated federal agency advisory committees, professional associations, industry associations, and international standards development organizations.

Central to the success of these efforts is awareness and alignment driven by agency heads; and commitment to and participation by them, their organizations, and their partners in these communities to develop, use, and mature responsible information sharing capabilities.

We have faced exceptional challenges over the past year, including new and evolving threats, uncertain planning horizons, and constrained budgets. Collectively, we are building on existing efforts to further strengthen national capabilities and address evolving threats. In the coming year, we will continue to use all of our tools and capabilities -- and discover new ones -- to support implementation of the president’s strategy and to further strengthen the Information Sharing Environment. Together with our partners, inside the government and out, we continue our journey to enhance national security through responsible information sharing.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
kpaul200
50%
50%
kpaul200,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2013 | 5:19:08 PM
Re: Is there a success story?
Yes, the Office of the PM-ISE was adversely impacted in the recent partial shutdown of the government.
supersupersuper3
100%
0%
supersupersuper3,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2013 | 9:43:35 AM
Re: Is there a success story?
on this quote  'Those and other efforts gained added visibility with October being National Cybersecurity Awareness Month.' 

if I recall government was shutdown for 21 days in october, so there really wasn't much of a national cybersecurity awareness month?  weren't the ISE offices also shutdown during the government furlough too? 
kpaul200
0%
100%
kpaul200,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/20/2013 | 4:58:55 PM
Re: Fusion centers
Hello, Wyatt,

An important point to make is that Fusion Centers serve a much broader mission than post-9/11 counterterrorism. Fusion centers in Boston and New Jersey were essential in our ability to respond to incidents like the Boston Marathon bombing and Hurricane Sandy. As I mentioned above,  I've been really impressed with the progress of the National Fusion Center Association over the years; they've matured into an effective and valuable organization. In our Annual Report to Congress, we feature trending information on the performance of the National Network of Fusion Centers - their maturation is impressive. Also in the report is data on complaince and performance as it relates to privacy policies and implementation. Acknowledging gaps and opportunities to improve, I think we're going to continue to see the National Network mature and become a more central part of our Information Sharing Environment as envisioned in the national strategies. 
kpaul200
0%
100%
kpaul200,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/20/2013 | 4:53:51 PM
Re: Is there a success story?
David, thanks for your question. You're right to point out challenges in the past. We still have challenges in front of us, despite all the progress made. There are a lot of good examples out there. I mentioned the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing above. I was recently at MIT in Cambridge, MA for an event on information sharing, and was pleased to hear law enforcement – who played such a critical role in the response to that event – talk about the difference their information sharing investments made on their ability to respond to the incident (both in the immediate aftermath, and during the investigation). We have a transparent assessment of progress, gaps and success stories, in our 2013 Annual Report and in our Building Blocks on our website. 

http://www.ise.gov/annual-report

http://www.ise.gov/building-blocks

 
WKash
100%
0%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
11/19/2013 | 4:32:34 PM
Fusion centers
Fusion centers remain a subject filled with controversy.  While some serve as the model of efficient information pooling and sharing between federal, state and local authorities, others exist because of post 9/11 funding steams that once flowed easily but which often no longer seem justified.  Question: Will we see a move to consolidate fusion centers similar to the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative?   
William Terdoslavich
100%
0%
William Terdoslavich,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2013 | 1:00:40 PM
Re: Is there a success story?
In the realm of covert affairs, success stories don't get aired until the affair becomes moot, usually after the passage of several decades. The reasoning is that any release of the story compromises "sources and methods", which are just as valuable as the secrets garnered by these means. Revelation gives the "enemy" a chance to change their "sources andmethods", making detection of their plans that much harder. 

This turns oversight upside down. How can you check for effectiveness if the "covert agency" cannot be judged by the outcomes it obtains?
David F. Carr
100%
0%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
11/19/2013 | 9:55:25 AM
Is there a success story?
We've heard so much about fumbled data sharing between intelligence/military/law enforcement agencies leading to disaster. Are there good examples today of where better sharing (that wouldn't have happened a few years ago) has prevented death & destruction? Or will we never hear about those?
Skirting the Big Data Expertise Shortage
Skirting the Big Data Expertise Shortage
Federal departments and agencies have embraced big data in a big way, despite a shortage of trained and experienced workers, particularly data scientists. What tools and strategies are helping bridge the divide?
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and community news at InformationWeek.com.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.