Healthcare // Analytics
Commentary
8/14/2013
04:22 PM
Rob Preston
Rob Preston
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Death By A Million Regulations

It is long past time to assess the consequences of the endless laws, codes, rules, licenses and guidelines governing just about every human activity.

Six healthcare industry IT executives recently sat down with InformationWeek editors to discuss a range of issues, from remote patient monitoring to electronic health records to population health management to clinical decision support. But when we started the conversation by asking about "the things that are dominating your agendas," we got an earful on a subject we weren't quite expecting.

"Regulatory. It's just a waste of our time doing ICD-10," said Larry Garber, Reliant Medical Group's medical director for informatics, referring to the new, more detailed set of codes the feds require to report medical diagnoses and procedures. Garber noted that complying with some federal regulations, such as "meaningful use" of electronic health records, is worth the effort. But complying with ICD-10 amounts to busy work. "So unrewarding," Garber said.

Before he could say another discouraging word, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center CIO John Halamka chimed in: "So much of my innovation has almost ground to a halt because so much of my staff is dealing with the must-dos from state and federal regulators, much of which is nonsensical and not value-added."

Halamka cited BIDMC's $5.3 million settlement on July 29 with the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General (OIG), addressing government allegations that the Harvard teaching hospital had overcharged Medicare by admitting patients between 2004 and 2008 who should have been treated less expensively as outpatients. The Boston Globe reported that BIDMC didn't admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement, "which both sides described as a way to avoid costly legal action."

"It's basically about how you describe an inpatient versus an outpatient observation stay," Halamka told us. He described the issue as "so deeply technical" that it took his IT staff six months to implement the logic needed to comply with the complex regulations. "It's utterly esoteric. But the OIG has decided that it's a priority. This is what we're dealing with every day."

Global CIO
Global CIOs: A Site Just For You
Visit InformationWeek's Global CIO -- our online community and information resource for CIOs operating in the global economy.

Forrester Research estimates that companies spend about 1.75% of their IT budgets on risk and compliance management software. But spending estimates go much higher, to as much as 10% of IT budgets, when factoring in security, storage, archiving, content management, e-discovery, disaster recovery and other compliance-related investments. Halamka and Garber suggest it's eating up far more of their organizations' time and creative energy. And when InformationWeek recently asked healthcare IT pros in a survey to rank their top priorities, an astounding 61% put "meet regulatory requirements" as a "top priority" -- 5 on a 5-point scale. Just 47% of respondents ranked "improve care" that highly.

These aren't rabid capitalists just looking to make a quick buck. In the case of Halamka and Garber, they're world-class technologists and highly respected doctors -- Dr. Halamka is a practicing emergency physician and Dr. Garber is an internist. They say they can't find enough time to do what they were hired to do (innovate) and what their colleagues and patient-customers depend on them to do (elevate the level of care) because they and their people are spending much of their 12-hour days dotting i's and crossing t's.

The Best Intentions

Almost all proposed rules and regulations sound reasonable, even virtuous. They're crammed with the best intentions. A patients' bill of rights here. A privacy-protection law or two there.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
kkinnison
50%
50%
kkinnison,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/27/2013 | 12:12:17 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
If you seriously believe that the entire economy collapsed because a few people couldn't pay back their loans you need to look harder at what happened. There is always a percentage of loans that was expected to fail, only a relative tiny amount of extra failures started the snowball.- And if those HAD been under the fannie/freddie umbrella we wouldn't have had an issue.
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
8/22/2013 | 9:53:16 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
Perhaps there's hope. Some food for thought on WSJ.com (subscribers only): http://online.wsj.com/article/...
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
8/19/2013 | 6:37:41 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
If we're just out to stick it to the "annoying profit sink-holes," let's not take down the good with the bad. As mjensen810 states above, "the innocent get pilloried along with the guilty." Let's crack down on the bad actors, not everyone in a given industry.
pwndecaf
50%
50%
pwndecaf,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/19/2013 | 6:36:30 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
And who made the stupid loans that would not be paid back? It wasn't the government and the people that bailed out their sorry a$$es. Fannie/Freddie are private enterprises, which the government has no business sponsoring (GSE).
pwndecaf
50%
50%
pwndecaf,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/19/2013 | 6:30:03 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
Try this - speculative financial banking vs commercial banking. Good enough!
Stay away from my money if you are the former.
UberGoober
50%
50%
UberGoober,
User Rank: Strategist
8/19/2013 | 5:57:12 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
The first thing I'd suggest is a Constitutional amendment to limit all laws to 20 pages. If you've got a lot to do, write a lot of laws that an ordinary person can understand. There's never been or will be a 1000 page law that does what it should (cf: Dodd-Frank, ACA, etc).
UberGoober
50%
50%
UberGoober,
User Rank: Strategist
8/19/2013 | 5:24:30 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
Historical revisionism will get you nowhere but the podium at the Democrat convention. For the record, the regulations requiring loans to folks who had no real chance or repaying them, plus the implict (and actualized) gubmint backing of Fannie and Freddie are primarily what got us into the mess. The temptation to make a bad loan and sell it to government backed suckers was high, and a lot of folks took 'em up on it.

That and the stupidly long period of very low interest rates that led to the housing bubble; of course, Bernanke is too smart to do that again... NOT.
kallinghamk2l
50%
50%
kallinghamk2l,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/19/2013 | 4:10:44 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
Come on. Regulations exists for one reason and one reason only. Bad past behavior by corporations not caring about the welfare of workers, the public, and other annoying profit sink-holes like that...
NJ Mike
50%
50%
NJ Mike,
User Rank: Strategist
8/19/2013 | 12:02:39 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
Hey, there should be a regulation specifying requirements for "Like" buttons, so whatever website or forum you're reading, you can easily identify the "Like" button". Oh, and there should be a requirement for a "Not Like" button.
ANON1246385228451
50%
50%
ANON1246385228451,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/17/2013 | 3:09:07 PM
re: Death By A Million Regulations
Great idea! The Department of Regulatory Regulation! A new cabinet post.
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Big Love for Big Data? The Remedy for Healthcare Quality Improvements
Big Love for Big Data? The Remedy for Healthcare Quality Improvements
Healthcare data is nothing new, but yet, why do healthcare improvements from quantifiable data seem almost rare today? Healthcare administrators have a wealth of data accessible to them but aren't sure how much of that data is usable or even correct.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014
Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of November 16, 2014.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.