Global CIO: iPad Versus Motorola Xoom: Apps Give Apple Huge Advantage
In considering new Android and Blackberry tablets, CIOs need to focus on the numbers that matter: how many apps, and price of device.
"The iPad has way more tablet-specific apps—around 60,000 versus a handful—and, in my tests, much better battery life. Plus, whatever the specs say, it's a fast device with a beautiful screen that delights people daily."
Walt Mossberg has forgotten more about personal technology than I'll ever know, but his article falls short of meeting the information needs of CIOs precisely because it pays far too much attention to physical qualities that are nice but hardly strategic—"I found [Xoom] generally comfortable to hold, except when I was reading for long periods in vertical mode, where the long, thin shape and weight made it feel a bit unbalanced"—and not nearly enough to the stuff that really matters: what business apps are available right now, which ones will be ready for use in the next three months, and which ones will be unavailable for use for half a year or more?
Then again, that's why Mossberg writes a column called "Personal Technology"—he's got huge following of all types but he focuses his work on how individual users will engage with new gadgets. And both the iPad and the Xoom will be used by many tens of millions of individuals.
CIOs who think the Apple iPad is little more than a stranger in a strange land and will never blend into their Windows-centric environments might want to note that Citrix reports that its iPad app that offers full access to Windows desktops has been downloaded more than 700,000 times.
In more tangible terms, here's how that translates to innovation in the IT-rich world of healthcare, according to an ITworld.com article: "Since Citrix virtual desktop solutions don't store data on a device, they make an ideal option for accessing secure data (as well as Windows applications) from mobile devices. In fact, Citrix has been a major factor in the iPad's rapid adoption in healthcare." (End of excerpt.)
On top of that, Salesforce.com says the iPad app for its enterprise-strength Chatter social collaboration program has been downloaded more than 1 million times.
When CIOs evaluate those types of head starts versus alternative tablets that (a) aren't even out yet and (b) have limited software partnerships immediately in place, Apple and the iPad look better and better.
Unbeatable? Not necessarily—but again, for CIOs, the battle's about applications and business value, not about hardware features.
On the business value side, the number of available apps tell much of the story because without them, well, it's pretty tough to do much business. But another huge factor in the business-value equation for tablets is price, and Mossberg offered some telling comments about that in his article about the Motorola Xoom versus the iPad:
"Unfortunately for consumers looking for iPad alternatives, the Xoom has an Achilles' heel: price. While iPads come in a range of models priced all the way up to $829—none of which requires a cellphone contract—Apple's entry price for the iPad is just $499. By contrast, the base price of a Xoom without a cellphone contract is $800—60% more. And even with a Verizon two-year contract at $20 to $80 a month—depending on the data limit you choose—the least you can pay for a Xoom is $600, or 20% more before counting the contract costs."
Google in the Enterprise SurveyThere's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity ≠products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent ≠mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers ≠distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.