Strategic CIO // Team Building & Staffing
Commentary
6/12/2013
05:32 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2

How do Saul Alinsky's rules for activists apply to tech executives? Let us keep counting the ways.

Pick a fire large and substantive enough that you can weave it thematically through your entire transformation narrative. And then tell that story every chance you get.

Rule 9: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.

This rule only works once you've established credibility. The best example is Alinsky's O'Hare Airport stunt. He leaked word that mobs of activists were going to tie up the washrooms at O'Hare Airport, and Chicago quickly agreed to his terms.

In technology, this rule is demonstrated at the industry level by the artful leak. Take, for example, rumors about who AppGooBook is thinking about buying. Those leaks are mostly intentional, so ask yourself: Why are they leaking it? The media savvy understand that the messaging around these investments is meant to 1) put Goliath's large competitors on notice and, sadly 2) issue the subtlest of cease-and-desist letters to similar startups/targets. Regardless of their tenacity, the Davids will be forced into existential heartburn -- "If that Goliath is getting into our space then our days are numbered."

If you're skeptical about that last point, ask yourself this question: If most acquisitions are really talent plays, why wouldn't Mr. Moneybags buy up multiple startups in the same space? There's certainly plenty of talent. And Mr. Moneybags has plenty of money.

The artful leak at the industry level creates a reaction among competitors similar to Chicago's reaction to Alinksy's airport stunt. The threat of the entrant is enough to get everyone spinning, wasting dollars and effort on countermeasures to an illusory menace.

There's also an alternate, more populist application of this rule if you're not in a C-level seat. If you're a change agent in IT and can get past the agitating and actually deliver, repeatedly, you can leverage that credibility to force the internal obstructionists onto your next bandwagon. Why? Because corporate white blood cells are usually career climbers, and nothing is more terrifying to them than not being on a journey that's guaranteed to get to its destination.

So when there's credibility behind the message "we're doing this with or without you," the pathogen wins.

Rule 10: Develop operations that will maintain a constant pressure on your competitors.

Some folks have a hard time differentiating between Rules 8 and 10. Rule 8 is about having several models of cars and switching between them frequently. Rule 10 is about investing in an assembly line.

Picking up where we left off in Rule 1, if you're the legacy application owner who's fixing your broken windows, you simply can't stop after one proof of concept (POC). Your management and/or business stakeholders will write that one act off as a fluke. You must deliver POCs regularly.

Two questions always pop up: Where will I find the time and who will pay for it? Both are great examples of you sabotaging you.

Let me put on my Tony Robbins mask for a sec. (Don't be afraid of the horse teeth.) You can always spin another plate! Building an assembly line of and for POCs advances your agenda, so it should trump at least a dozen deliverables now on your plate.

As for who pays for it, who pays for your daily hour of checking emails? The daily hour of browsing? The hour of nothing between two meetings? The half day when a fire erupts in production?

We all have the Google 20% time, but most of us just flush it down the business-as-usual toilet.

Oh, and a quick note on the Google 20%. It's spin. It didn't start out as some premeditated commitment to innovation. It's a recognition by management that everyone needs a break from his or her day job. And if you're not encouraged to spend that time on something constructive and to the benefit of your employer, you'll spend it browsing.

Previous
2 of 3
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DAVIDINIL
50%
50%
DAVIDINIL,
User Rank: Strategist
6/20/2013 | 1:58:45 PM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
Not a single person in the country is against better health and happiness for all. But at $16 trillion in debt, I would expect that I would be experiencing nirvana every day. But I am not and we all just read how Coverlet is not.
I am no economist, but $16 trillion seems like a lot of money. That debt will be paid back eventually with worthless inflated future dollars. If I understand the Tea partiers beef correctly, it is that they don't believe the government is up to the challenge of refining the system. And eventually the weight of the debt will blow it up whether we want it to or not.
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
6/19/2013 | 5:28:33 PM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
Extreme socialism has been tried and failed, but modern socialism as defined by the Tea Party is alive and well and living in countries with much less poverty, much better health and higher educational and happiness outcomes compared with the U.S. Certainly people game the system - no matter what system we put in place, someone will game it. I've seen people game the system of pulling numbers at the deli counter. But the answer isn't to blow up the system, it's to refine it, often using technology.
Coverlet
50%
50%
Coverlet,
User Rank: Strategist
6/18/2013 | 1:43:43 AM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
One point for Google's marketing savvy. The formula is: figure out something positive that everyone's already doing and name it after yourself.

If Marissa Mayer has an ounce of Google still in her, she'll market Yahoo's extension of maternity leave as the Yahoo Happy Mommy. Tagline--- "Everyone else hates mothers. Not Yahoo!"
Coverlet
50%
50%
Coverlet,
User Rank: Strategist
6/18/2013 | 1:25:16 AM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
I think of honesty as less an inspiration and more a habit. I'll stop before another nun reference flies out. I've hit my yearly quota.
Coverlet
50%
50%
Coverlet,
User Rank: Strategist
6/18/2013 | 1:18:13 AM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
Dammit!! With a Yoda quote I should have ended.
Coverlet
50%
50%
Coverlet,
User Rank: Strategist
6/18/2013 | 1:16:08 AM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
Great example. Made me think of Bruce Schneier's pieces on security theater.
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
User Rank: Author
6/17/2013 | 9:55:50 PM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
This is a great challenge: "We all have the Google 20% time, but most of us just flush it down the business-as-usual toilet."
DAVIDINIL
50%
50%
DAVIDINIL,
User Rank: Strategist
6/17/2013 | 8:10:50 PM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
Coverlet, I completely agree with the idea that work should not suck as much as it does. There has got to be a better way. I pray that you find such a way. The cubicle drones (I am one of them) are in favor of your IT strategies and in favor of compassionate leadership and employee enrichment. The sticking point is that like government humanitarian programs, many cubicle dwellers would find ways to take advantage of these work enrichment programs. I know way too many perfectly healthy adults collecting disability checks from the government. These adults work under the table for pay, whilst getting disability checks from the govt. I am all for compassion. But how about verifying that the need is really there.

The global warming (GW) debate is not about warming or not. The debate is about man made causation or not. If government decides that man causes GW, then we will all end up buying carbon offsets from Al Gore, making him rich and me poor and the environment no better than it is.

The Tea Party
does not inert itself into every conversation. The Tea Party is simply everyday people opining that government $16 trillion debt is unhealthy for the country and places us ever closer to socialism. Socialism has been tried and proven to be a
failure. History is very clear about this.

Good article.
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
6/17/2013 | 8:09:02 PM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
I have eaten those eggs you mention. A corollary lesson: Eggs do not seem to inspire honesty.

Colleagues who always have your back inspire honesty.

Laurianne McLaughlin
InformationWeek
jries921
50%
50%
jries921,
User Rank: Ninja
6/17/2013 | 5:37:15 PM
re: Rules For Radical CIOs: Part 2
First let me point out a typo:

Eric R.'s last name is spelled the same as mine: Ries. Mind you, he's probably as used to misspellings and mispronunciations as I am.

Now for your concluding statement:

I agree that scale is a problem. We've become a nation of servants and are well on our way to becoming a world of servants. Few can hope to really be their own bosses, which tends to give us a lot less sympathy for our bosses than we would have if we had a realistic hope of filling their shoes. And those bosses who really are socipaths don't have to worry as much about their employees walking away as they would if it were easy for one to start one's own business.

But the big problems are:

1. Too many people have trained themselves to turn off their consciences when they become inconvenient (especially in the workplace). While we all do this to an extent, we don't have to and shouldn't rationalize it. It's a lot easier for evil to prevail if good people won't sacrifice to do the right thing.

2. We frequently forget that while we have no real control and only limited influence over the behavior of others, we have (or can have) a very high degree of control over our own actions. And we do have influence; mostly over our friends, families, and acquaintances, but we have it nonetheless. How we use that influence is up to us.

3, We forget that the struggle between good and evil mostly goes on within ourselves, not between competing groups or individuals. In nearly every conflict, there are good and bad people on all sides (and everything in between). We all have (at least figurative) angels and devils sitting our our shoulders trying to guide us in one way or the other. Our challenges are first to recognize which is which; then to follow our own better impulses consistently; then to encourage others to do the same.

And as long as we're talking Star Wars, we consider should consider a statement by Yoda in "The Phantom Menace": "Hard to see the dark side is". It's trivially easy to misjudge the motives of others, both good and bad (so be careful).
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
2014 US Salary Survey: 10 Stats
2014 US Salary Survey: 10 Stats
InformationWeek surveyed 11,662 IT pros across 30 industries about their pay, benefits, job satisfaction, outsourcing, and more. Some of the results will surprise you.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 7, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program!
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.