Strategic CIO // Executive Insights & Innovation
Commentary
7/25/2013
09:43 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The Death And Life Of Companies

Why the aging effects of Big should compel companies to have kids.

Scale is the problem.

That's why I find it darkly comic that most startups do everything they can to scale quickly. We all turn into our parents someday. Startups are just a little too eager to get there, the same way -- and for the same reasons -- that toddlers add "and a half" to their age: They long to sit at the adult table.

Startups are at the other end of "too big to fail" -- too small to know any better. They're willfully blind to the fact that scale is to companies what age is to you and me. It's what eventually kills even the healthiest and luckiest among us.

Normally, that would just be my gut talking. But there are those in academia, such as Geoffrey West, who are making this a data-driven discussion, applying the principles of biology and physics to social systems to better understand scaling phenomena.

West's research builds on the idea that metabolism scales predictably. Once you understand the rate of metabolism for a mouse (average lifespan of two to five years), you can accurately predict the average lifespan of an elephant given its rate of metabolism. And this kind of regularity, West notes, is found from intra-cellular activity all the way up -- some 30 orders of magnitude -- to ecosystems.

The mind-blowing part is that businesses, by behaving like social organisms, operate under the same laws. After a certain size, they die.

"Not true," you say. “There are lots of huge companies that continue to operate and even thrive with massive scale. All the big banks, for instance, have hundreds of thousands of employees, and they are ... um ... OK. You got a point."

Culturally, large companies are the elderly, minus the wisdom. Their metabolism has, well, matured. Information takes longer to disseminate. Decisions don't get made as quickly as they used to. Execution becomes more conservative. Organizational habits calcify.

And just so we're clear, the problem isn't that the biggest companies are filled with old employees. Put 250,000 energetic twentysomethings into a company by themselves and within a week their culture will scream at you to get off their lawn. Hippie!

Global CIO
Global CIOs: A Site Just For You
Visit InformationWeek's Global CIO -- our online community and information resource for CIOs operating in the global economy.

So scale is the problem. And biology is an old and apt metaphor.

I wish I could say that technology is the answer, the metaphorical medicine. This certainly would be the right forum.

But technology doesn't seem to be the viable long-term solution. It's at best a temporary treatment to the interminable realities of slowing metabolism.

It improves blood/information flow (communications and collaboration) -- via email, for instance -- but it's only a matter of time before the organism builds drug resistance and you start getting 1,300 emails a day.

Technology increases the intelligence needed for decision-making, helping transform raw data into meaningful and useful information. But owning a gun and pulling the trigger aren't the same thing.

Tech can even speed up execution, delivering beautiful ready-for-production prototypes fast. But then watch them gather dust for months or years as everyone who needs to weigh in -- legal, compliance, operations, strategy, HR, finance and even the government -- takes their sweet time.

Tech is needed, but it's not the answer. After a certain age -- or more accurately in the case of business, after a certain size -- drugs aren't the answer.

In the short run, we need to create scale-free zones: galvanistic management practices -- like what agile does for development or what a school-within-a-school does for public education -- that inject electricity into the lifeless culture of Big. Like Shelley's monster, what we create will never truly be alive, but it'll extend the illusion of life indefinitely, providing meaningful employment to millions of people.

In the long run, a more profound transformation is needed. And it lies at the intersection of biology (as a metaphor) and religion (as an approach to encountering mortality). Large companies have to learn to make friends with death. Or if they're uncomfortable with Eastern answers to the large existential questions, they need to fall back on the more familiar Judeo-Christian solution: They need to have kids.

The Trouble With Spinoffs

Every time a large company in crisis goes through a soul-searching exercise, some clever executive inevitably suggests that it spin off a portion of its technology portfolio. If you buy into the biological metaphor, it's the right idea (let's have a kid), but with all the love and warmth of a sociopathic legal entity (let's sell him).

Just because they sell babies doesn't mean corporations are evil. (Put that on a t-shirt!) To call them evil would be like calling subsistence farmers in the 12th century evil because they had as many children as they could, viewing kids as cheap labor and the best insurance policy against dying of old age (which in the Middle Ages was a crotchety 30).

Corporations as social organisms have some evolving to do. They have a long way to go before they get to modern notions of parenting.

The idea of corporate legacy is still mostly a brand-building gimmick. It'll take some time before the sterile profit-centered institutions of today appreciate that they should invest some of that loot in their legacy. It'll be a long while before they act like there's no greater legacy than their spinoffs and no greater purpose than making sure they succeed.

The odd part is that each of us, as the individuals who make up the larger social organism, intuitively understand the importance of parenting. Just not in the context of work. Not yet.

This can be a bottom-up revolution. We can, collectively, make it less foreign to most companies that spinoffs, like children, should be a product of love, not economic necessity. And raising them should be a balancing act between providing age-appropriate challenges and support.

We just need to apply our collective understanding that child rearing, in every context, is about daily acts of kindness and selfless service. It's an ongoing exercise in character building for both parent and child.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Coverlet
50%
50%
Coverlet,
User Rank: Strategist
8/1/2013 | 12:18:23 AM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
InformationWeek has better crap than this.

Not me though. This is the best I can do. :)

You obviously read the piece or you wouldn't have made the Infosys reference. As negative as your tone is, I actually agree with you-- my pieces could use more substance. So I appreciate the feedback. And I'll work on incorporating more data into my opinion pieces.

Check out the link to Dr. West's video. His work is data-driven and worth the investment.
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
7/31/2013 | 2:01:26 PM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
InformationWeek has timely, deep analysis on all of these companies with analysis of their recent results. They're all moving into fast-growing new markets (like big data and cloud) and they're doing what they can to make the most of markets that aren't growing. I have published many recent articles on IBM, SAP, HP and Oracle, but a comment window is not the place to post an article.
ObviousGenius
50%
50%
ObviousGenius,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/31/2013 | 1:01:48 PM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
More simple analysis:

If you plug some of sacalpha1's anonymous profile data into LinkedIn, you can discover his real identity.

Hint: it rhymes with Steven Chapman, President at Stratolution.

He even uses the same awful picture. I don't think that's vomit I'm tasting. It's bile.

Lucky for Steve that his thoughtful feedback is anonymous.
clemalum
50%
50%
clemalum,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/31/2013 | 12:47:04 PM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
His online resume must make Clemson proud. He spells it Clemson Unniversity. The second n is for emphasis.
Sacalpha1
50%
50%
Sacalpha1,
User Rank: Strategist
7/31/2013 | 4:18:47 AM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
Really Doug!! Why doesn't InfoWeek collect some real data and facts, do some analysis and present conclusions based on the data and analysis instead of this opinionated drivel.
Sacalpha1
50%
50%
Sacalpha1,
User Rank: Strategist
7/31/2013 | 4:15:40 AM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
Almost the entire article is esoteric opinion. There is not data or analysis in the article to support the author's supposition. The closest would be the anecdotal story from Infor. And that poor example was the only one listed in two pages of opinionated ramblings. Based on this author's views, all of the Fortune 500 would be out of business and no company could last for more than 10 to 20 years.

Really!! This crap is the best Information Week can come up with to fill out it's needed content??? Maybe Information Week is the one who is old and irrelevant and going out of business.
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
7/29/2013 | 3:43:59 PM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
These are timely thoughts, indeed, as IT giants IBM, HP, Microsoft, Oracle and SAP are all struggling, in one way or another, with their next phase of growth and ways to transform their businesses for a new era.
Coverlet
50%
50%
Coverlet,
User Rank: Strategist
7/29/2013 | 2:51:38 PM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
Quick answer: Daily whippings. Fixes everything.

Longer term, I think the question is: How can you raise a child without spoiling her? Part of the answer lies in how to foster genuine empathy. And part of it is how one can create an authentic simulation of flying without a net.
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
7/29/2013 | 2:23:45 PM
re: The Death And Life Of Companies
So pampering your smart people/incubators is a bad idea. What kind of challenges do you recommend throwing at them? Limiting budget, making them deal with administrative BS?

Oh, and if you're smart enough to know OWS is a good idea, you know what schadenfreude means :-D
The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - September 10, 2014
A high-scale relational database? NoSQL database? Hadoop? Event-processing technology? When it comes to big data, one size doesn't fit all. Here's how to decide.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.