Government // Enterprise Architecture
11:26 AM
Connect Directly
Don't Miss The All Analytics Academy: Analytics for All - A Right Start
Jun 07, 2016
Whether your organization is considering the use of big data and analytics, or has taken its first ...Read More>>

Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List

Yes, our organization is heavily invested in Microsoft products, but here's why the CEO's exit won't keep me up at night.

Steve Ballmer's impending departure is a big deal ... if you work at Microsoft. Or if you're worried about your MSFT stock price. (Disclosure: I don't hold any individual tech stocks.) But when you're in the business of running an IT organization, you tend to take the CEO change at yet another large, legacy supplier in stride.

I'm not saying that leadership changes aren't important. But I ask myself several clarifying questions before adding a supplier CEO change to my worry list.

1. Could the change destabilize or even threaten the viability of our supplier in the short- or medium-term?

If my organization depends on a startup or small, established company for something mission critical, and a change in leadership signals that the company is on the decline, I would start doing contingency planning with my IT colleagues and the organization's leadership team. But a CEO change at Microsoft doesn't worry me, even if the company has lost its "we control everything about computing" mojo.

[ For another perspective on Ballmer's departure, see Ballmer Is Off The Matrix. ]

Could a new CEO help restore Microsoft to some semblance of dominance? Sure. But as an end user rather than an investor, I'm less concerned about the upside of that outcome than the potential downside to my organization.

2. Have I fallen into the "single supplier" trap?

A change in vendor leadership can sometimes lead to product price increases and thus hurt my bottom line. So this one is at least a candidate for my worry list. We, like many other enterprises, run a truckload of ISV apps on Windows server/SQL platforms, and we pay maintenance fees on many of the critical ones.

But we've diversified in other areas. I remember when my staff was insistent that Windows Mobile was going to be the light and the way. (The Microsoft machine had done a great job of convincing them that "standardization" was the easy and sensible path.) "Nobody's going to use that Apple stuff for business!" was the anti-rallying cry when we started deploying iPhones. Meanwhile, as an observer I've noted that Sears and Office Depot are now using iPads and iPhones as a part of their retail operations.

Point is, we didn't give in to the fact that our IT staff was comfortable with the Microsoft ecosystem. We use non-Microsoft content management, phones and systems management tools. So our future (and budget) isn't completely dependent on Microsoft -- another reason Ballmer's leaving isn't at the top of my worry list.

Global CIO
Global CIOs: A Site Just For You
Visit InformationWeek's Global CIO -- our online community and information resource for CIOs operating in the global economy.

3. Am I depending on this supplier for innovations?

I need some tech suppliers, most notably my ERP supplier, to produce innovations on a regular basis, or at least enable my team to produce innovations on its platform. But Microsoft isn't my ERP supplier.

I'm not looking to Microsoft for innovations. I'm looking to spunky startups or larger, enterprise-focused suppliers (not the makers of Xbox and Kinect). Granted, Microsoft's experiments with tablets are interesting, but it's the follower, not the innovator, in this sector. And don't get me started about Windows 8.

4. Is this the founding, visionary CEO?

When CEO Steve Jobs died, it rocked the world of enterprise customers who depend on Apple. Jobs not only had founded Apple, but he led it out of hard times. Will Jobs successor Tim Cook be able to sustain the company's innovation?

Students of business understand all too well what happen when a visionary founder leaves a company. The canonical example is Edwin Land, the scientist and visionary who led Polaroid to temporary greatness. Polaroid fortunes didn't do so well after Land's departure.

But Ballmer's not the Microsoft founder. He did a pretty good job of working with what he had, sustaining Microsoft's gigantic machine during a fiercely competitive period. Microsoft has already proved that there's life after Bill Gates.

Ballmer and Microsoft's board are changing direction to become a "devices and services company." With Microsoft taking a year to find and prepare its next CEO, you can bet the transition will be orderly -- and if the company does it right it will re-instill some product and strategy mojo.

Worst-case scenario, Microsoft will muddle along, churning through a couple of CEOs (much as HP did) while watching its stock price dive. But even under that scenario, it still would invest in and ship key products and provide support.

If I were a day trader or stock analyst, I might agonize over Microsoft's CEO transition a lot more, but I'm in the business of enterprise IT, so I'm just watching with casual interest.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Alex Kane Rudansky
Alex Kane Rudansky,
User Rank: Author
8/27/2013 | 6:35:44 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
Ballmer is no Steve Jobs, as the article states, or even Bill Gates, for that matter. His departure is sure to affect the internal workings of the company in some ways, but this is not a significant game changer in any way in terms of how it will affect Microsoft product maintenance, development, etc.
User Rank: Strategist
8/28/2013 | 1:12:38 AM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
Under a new CEO, Microsoft could play better with open source, broaden what it's willing to integrate with in the cloud and consolidate a permanent place for itself in the business data center. This would leave it a stronger, if also a gentler, giant. Or it could strive to become the leader of consumer computing all over again.
User Rank: Author
8/28/2013 | 1:48:11 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
One scenario I'd at least have some concern about: If the new CEO takes the company in a new direction, focusing investment on, say, consumer-oriented technologies while neglecting certain enterprise products.
David F. Carr
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
8/28/2013 | 1:49:42 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
I guess what you don't want is Microsoft acting like a desperate, cornered animal, lashing out in all directions.
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2013 | 2:16:52 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
I'll say a bit more: Ballmer WAS on my worry list.
Now he departed he is no longer on my worry list.
User Rank: Ninja
8/28/2013 | 5:40:33 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
He's not gone yet. If I'm reading the reports correctly, he may be on the job for another year.
Michael Endler
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
8/28/2013 | 6:16:40 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
Indeed. I think the final months of Ballmer's leadership could determine whether the next CEO continues to pursue consumers. But this passage from the story struck me as very wise: "Worst-case scenario, Microsoft will muddle along,
churning through a couple of CEOs (much as HP did) while watching its
stock price dive. But even under that scenario, it still would invest in
and ship key products and provide support." Whether Microsoft keeps chasing consumers or not, the company's not facing armageddon yet, and neither are most customers who use its products.
Shane M. O'Neill
Shane M. O'Neill,
User Rank: Author
8/28/2013 | 6:51:17 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
Based on Microsoft's recent track record with consumers, that would not be a wise move for Ballmer's successor. Especially if a ramped up consumer focus comes at the expense of the company's enterprise cash cows. But yes, an over-eager successor fixating on consumers is a concern for enterprise IT leaders that lean heavily on MS business products. It's hard to think of a more difficult job to walk into than MS CEO. I see parallels with Barack Obama taking over the presidency in 2008. Obviously not THAT difficult, but very difficult.
User Rank: Ninja
8/28/2013 | 7:59:08 PM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
From an innovation perspective Microsoft will be a lot like Oracle has become. Others will innovate in the market. Microsoft will loose business to the innovators. Since Microsoft can't beat them Microsoft will buy them just as Oracle has. Big money always seems to win in the end no matter how poorly they are run or how terrible they treat their customers.
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
8/29/2013 | 2:46:53 AM
re: Why Ballmer's Departure Isn't On My Worry List
I'm not sure BlackBerry, Dell, HP or Kodak would agree with that assessment.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2016 InformationWeek Elite 100
Our 28th annual ranking of the leading US users of business technology.
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.