Comments
Smartphone Kill Switches Coming, But Critics Cry Foul
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
micjustin33
50%
50%
micjustin33,
User Rank: Moderator
4/17/2014 | 7:57:06 AM
Re: This is bad. Very, very bad.
I don't know how much kill switch option is useful for smartphones ..
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
4/16/2014 | 6:55:17 PM
Re: Parsing?
Security measures like this have limited value. But it's nice that remote wiping will be available for free...you know carriers wanted to charge for that. Professional cell phone thieves can rewrite IMEI numbers so those stolen moble blacklists are not perfect. Really, the answer is making mobile phones so cheap their loss isn't a big deal. If you're carrying $1,000 in the form of a mobile phone, it's going to be desirable to thieves, who know that most security measures can be reversed. 
Cybdiver01
50%
50%
Cybdiver01,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/16/2014 | 3:59:38 PM
Blackberry Enterprise old feature
Anyone that had a Blackberry on a company network knows that this feature has been available for a long time with BES.  As an admin I've wiped many stolen blackberries by remote and restored new ones the same way.

It's sad nobody likes the Blackberry like before, it's going the way of the Palm Pilot.
dwebb608
50%
50%
dwebb608,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/16/2014 | 3:48:55 PM
Re: This is bad. Very, very bad.
I agree with you.  This is not bad, but good.  Very, very good.  Notice that this voluntary group includes most of the major carriers.

What they're saying is that they will give up monthly fees for this type of service to make it universally available (at least to newer phones).  Reactivation should involve a total wipe and re-initialization, possibly with a restore from a backup securely stored with the carrier.

Enabling the feature by default, as the attorneys mentioned in the article support is also a good idea.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/16/2014 | 3:43:07 PM
Re: Parsing?
No doubt ... hackers will bypass it ... sincerely I don't like the idea to have a kill switch pre-installed on my mobile. We have also to consider that a similar feature could be abused by a bad actor.

 
DC2009
50%
50%
DC2009,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/16/2014 | 2:58:53 PM
What's next
I don't like it.  What's next - kills switches on your car and house?  Pretty soon the hackers will be hacking into your phone when it's not stolen and killing it.
jagibbons
50%
50%
jagibbons,
User Rank: Ninja
4/16/2014 | 2:31:37 PM
Re: Parsing?
Carriers will also lose out on significant phone sales. When a phone is stolen, that person buys a new one, often at the non-subsidized price. That's big revenue for carriers and manufacturers. However, cutting down on demand for stolen phones by locking them will benefit the consumer.
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
4/16/2014 | 2:13:58 PM
Re: This is bad. Very, very bad.
Kill switches require carriers to be saddled with another regulation, and that means it is going to cost money for them to enforce. What this is going to mean is that those costs are going to be eventually passed on to the customer.

Is that good? No one likes the high rate of cell phone bills already, but the reality is that most of us depend on them. Kill switches are almost like a form of insurance for the consumer, and a way to reduce smartphone thefts which might ultimately reduce crime.
cumulonimbus
50%
50%
cumulonimbus,
User Rank: Strategist
4/16/2014 | 1:54:55 PM
Smartphone kill switch
There are a number of apps can locate your phone in the event of loss, I have used one and was able to get the GPS coordinates to find it. It takes battery life, so the window is limited. I assume the kill switch would be the same. The idea is inline with the FCC regulation for electonic devices to accept input that is detrimental to operation. I believe there are sound reasons for this.
anon2920314289
50%
50%
anon2920314289,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/16/2014 | 1:34:38 PM
Re: This is bad. Very, very bad.
Do you see anywhere in any of these articles talking about how this enables to government? No, because that isn't the case and they leave it up the conspiricists and crazies like you to bring forth. Quit being ignorant, with these patches or not if someone who really knows tachnology and has to tools to do what they want... they can break into anything and most cetainly do this with or without these new features. 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A UBM Tech Radio episode on the changing economics of Flash storage used in data tiering -- sponsored by Dell.
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.