Comments
What If Microsoft And Intel Weren't Two Years Late?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ANON1237925156805
50%
50%
ANON1237925156805,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/21/2012 | 9:04:30 PM
re: What If Microsoft And Intel Weren't Two Years Late?
That's true but then again Newton was > 5 years too early and while not half baked it answered a need that wasn't yet out there and it was limited by the technology that existed at the time. The difference I think was in the Apple culture. Mr. Jobs and the team tha the surrounded himself with seemed to be able to learn from past failures without being scared to try again. Apple's turnaround could never have happened without that quality.

I read plenty of references to Newton when rumors of the "iSlate" surfaced. The Apple team knew that the technology was mature, they had a winning design team, and the market was ready. So they went forward.

Intel had some challenges in the core architecture of its chps; it's understandable that they didn't leap right away. MS is more of a mystery. I guess that Mr. Ballmer was still too busy explaining why smartphones were a passing fancy to see that tablets were the next PC.

I agree that Wintel could never have dominated this market as they once did PCs but they could have avoided the risk of going on life support. And Microsoft in particular could have triangulated a position between the totally closed world of Apple and the chaotic multi-flavor world of Android that might have been the sweet spot for many users. At this point they've got no margin for error but it ain't quite over. . .
CelticBrewer
50%
50%
CelticBrewer,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/21/2012 | 11:24:27 AM
re: What If Microsoft And Intel Weren't Two Years Late?
A better question would be, what if MS and Intel weren't 5 years too early and put out half baked ideas that failed?
Guest
50%
50%
Guest,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/20/2011 | 11:36:55 PM
re: What If Microsoft And Intel Weren't Two Years Late?
I thought Itanium (Itanic) was the Titanic at Intel?

Anyway, I think you nailed it. The device makers want to use Android over Windows in large part because Google will let them alter the OS and user experience. It gives them a chance to differentiate their products and not be in a pure commodity market (e.g. Windows PCs). Although, if Microsoft would have had their act together, they may have been able to keep that thought out of the OEM's heads. Now the genie is out of the bottle. How you going to keep them down on the farm after they have seen Karl Hungus?

Intel doesn't do low power well. It is kind of the nature of x86 and CISC, although Intel has been good at squeezing as much as possible out of x86. Similar situation, if Intel would have put out something that would have worked for Apple and the Android OEMs, they may have been able to head off ARM. Now people have rediscovered RISC and it is going to be hard for Intel to convince OEMs that they should pay more for the "Intel Inside" sticker. Also, as Steve Jobs said about Intel when choosing ARM, why tell Intel everything you know and help them build the chip when they are just going to turn around and sell it to your competitor?


The Agile Archive
The Agile Archive
When it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Elite 100 - 2014
Our InformationWeek Elite 100 issue -- our 26th ranking of technology innovators -- shines a spotlight on businesses that are succeeding because of their digital strategies. We take a close at look at the top five companies in this year's ranking and the eight winners of our Business Innovation awards, and offer 20 great ideas that you can use in your company. We also provide a ranked list of our Elite 100 innovators.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.