A Day Without Algorithms - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Comments
A Day Without Algorithms
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Drew Conry-Murray
100%
0%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
5/20/2014 | 10:45:20 AM
No Balance?
I realize you're exaggerating to make a point, but are you advocating that there should be no limits on the use of algorithmic decision-making? I think the spread of automated systems worries people because it's the ultimate in implaccable bueracracy.
IMjustinkern
50%
50%
IMjustinkern,
User Rank: Strategist
5/20/2014 | 11:34:27 AM
Re: No Balance?
Drew, totally agree. This article is an interesting thought exercise to the point of thinking of the alternative ... a total reliance on algos? Automated systems running on auto-pilot? That's a "Brazil" type future that's more frustrating than horrifying.
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
5/20/2014 | 2:02:54 PM
Re: No Balance?
"Brazil" was exactly what I was thinking of!
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
5/20/2014 | 6:42:33 PM
Re: No Balance?
Algorithms that affect people in meaningful ways (selecting people for job interviews, for example, or denying insurance coverage or driving driverless cards or counting votes) need to be open to public scrutiny.
castrotech
50%
50%
castrotech,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/21/2014 | 5:58:02 PM
Re: No Balance?
For public sector algorithms (e.g. who is selected for jury duty), openness probably makes a lot of sense. For private sector algorithms, there might be some proprietary information at stake. If you require these to be made public, you might reduce incentives to innovate. There are certainly algorithms that affect people in meaningful ways (e.g. dating apps) that are not open.  There is also a difference between just making it open and making a company go through a regulatory review process. The goal should be to balance innovation with protecting basic rights.
castrotech
50%
50%
castrotech,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/21/2014 | 6:01:45 PM
Re: No Balance?
Agree with your point about an "implaccable bureacracy." That's the worst. But people forget that even 10 years ago, we lived in a world with algorithms, they were often just really dumb algorithms. After all, "No, I can't do that. Company policy." is an algorithm too. My point is that smarter algorithms should help reduce some of these pain points. Compared to the status quo, that will often be much better. And when we have much more efficiency from algorithmic decision making, we can also make it much easier to resolve the boundary cases -- i.e. actually having a human to resolve things when you would otherwise be stuck in the bureacratic nightmare.


How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2017 State of the Cloud Report
As the use of public cloud becomes a given, IT leaders must navigate the transition and advocate for management tools or architectures that allow them to realize the benefits they seek. Download this report to explore the issues and how to best leverage the cloud moving forward.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of November 6, 2016. We'll be talking with the InformationWeek.com editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week to get the "story behind the story."
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll