Comments
Apple Buys Beats For Brand Power
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jgherbert
50%
50%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
5/31/2014 | 6:01:33 PM
Re: Apple Buys Beats - wasteful move
Well, it doesn't hit my pocket directly at least, so in that respect, no I do not care. It does seem like an awful lot of money though, so I'd have to assume that there's more to it than meets the eye.

One thing I thought was interesting, was reading on one of the Mac forums of people who were actually signing up to try Beats now that Apple bought them - whether because they're just devoted Apple fans or because they had been previously unaware of it and Apple's purchase generated attention, i don't know. I wonder if Beats' sub numbers will rise this month?
mak63
50%
50%
mak63,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2014 | 4:52:36 PM
Re: Apple Buys Beats - wasteful move
They should have just bought MOG before Beats did and rebranded it "iTunes.com". 

It would have been much cheaper to do so: Beats baid $16 million for MOG. Apple is paying $2.6 billion for what MOG has become since then

Yes, we all agree that 16 million is better than 2.6 billion, but -honestly- do we even care how much Apple paid for Beats?
SaneIT
100%
0%
SaneIT,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2014 | 7:47:54 AM
Re: Spotify
I doubt that Spotify would be next.  I think the move here was to capture a more urban audience.  The Beats brand seems to reach that market well so that is why Apple went that direction.  As noted by others the difference between what Apple paid for Beats and Beats paid for MOG is a good indicator of what Apple bought.  It wasn't the hardware it was the brand.  I'm sure Apple already has the marketing machine running at full speed and they will do a great job with the branding but I don't see the quality of the product improving through this process.
Alison_Diana
100%
0%
Alison_Diana,
User Rank: Author
5/29/2014 | 4:35:24 PM
Re: Spotify
Wouldn't that be interesting?! I wonder whether we'll see even more pop stars stick their names on headphones with Apple at the helm of Beats? A year or so ago I read an interesting article -- in Consumer Reports, perhaps? -- on these headsets, the money some stars made off them, and the (inferior) quality vs. other higher ticket sets. It was really fascinating to see how headphones have become the new sunglasses, in terms of slapping on a logo and charging a premium.
Lorna Garey
100%
0%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
5/29/2014 | 2:53:51 PM
Spotify
I'd love to know if Apple sniffed around Spotify and was rebuffed before making this deal. I agree with others, it seems like trying to buy coolness to me, which rarely works. But hey, it's not like Apple didn't have the money. Guess we'll see where it goes.
Thomas Claburn
100%
0%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
5/29/2014 | 12:40:19 PM
Re: Apple Buys Beats - wasteful move
>They should have just bought MOG before Beats did and rebranded it "iTunes.com". 

It would have been much cheaper to do so: Beats baid $16 million for MOG. Apple is paying $2.6 billion for what MOG has become since then.
moonwatcher
IW Pick
100%
0%
moonwatcher,
User Rank: Strategist
5/29/2014 | 9:58:19 AM
Apple Buys Beats - wasteful move
I see no "cred" in trying to buy "cool". If anything, it sounds desperate, not "cool" at all. It's like paying the high school football star to hang out with you so you can try getting chicks. Besides, Beats headphones and ear buds are not all that great for the money, compared to Sennheiser, AKG, Bose, and even lowly Sony products.

The young audience they are trying to capture with this move is notoriously fickle and whims can turn on a dime.

They should have just bought MOG before Beats did and rebranded it "iTunes.com". MOG was a better experience and more flushed out from the users point of view (being able to find new music you wanted to hear such as new releases, instead of relying on B.S. "currated" playlists). Hopefully Beats will correct those user interface mistakes before Apple takes over and they become entrenched.

 
BlairD155
50%
50%
BlairD155,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/29/2014 | 8:20:29 AM
Re: Beats
You have missed the boat on this one Beats is much more than a headphone/ear bud retailer . If you were to look in the trunk dashboard or door pannels of many new Dodge Chrysler Jeep  vehicles you would notice the Beats logo plastered all over the place not to mention the technology also comes standard in many new lap tops and cell phone.The water at Beats runs deeper than many seem to understand or realize,it's not just about the music and downloads or headphones any more. I for one would like to see a Beats smartphone controlled app for my car that could lock un-lock start and control the HVAC while reminding me where I parked and how much time is left on the parking meter while at the same time sending a play list to my car so when I hit the key I automatically hear that song I just tagged and sent to said car. And just for fun real time tracking so if I loan my car to someone I can see where it is and how fast they are driving. All this and more are already available through several third party retail companies so why not make it part of the total package when designing new cars? I think Apple has positioned themselves for the next level of global domination if they play their cards right ! "Idatalink" should be on the radar for Apple/Beats as the next partership/ acquisition. Does anyone remember a few years ago when Microsoft Ford/Sync Kenwood and ADS,idatalink parent company,teamed up and delivered something people actually wanted and were asking for? Check it out here...http://www.me-mag.com/product/item/41995-kenwood-announces-first-delivery-of-idatalink-maestro-rr-factory-ford-sync-integration-solution
midmachine
100%
0%
midmachine,
User Rank: Strategist
5/29/2014 | 8:07:55 AM
Re: Beats
The whole deal makesno sense. The Beats headphones, in my opinion, are horrible. Unless you enjoy headache producing bass that overwhelms all other frequencies in the music they are not for listening to anything other than rap or hip hop which, for that kind of money, is a ridiculous investment since those headphones sound like crap unless you are listening to a genre of music that will sooner, rather than later, fade away into obscurity like disco.

Agree also with the price for the streaming service, it isn't like they were nibbling away profoundly at Apple's streaming service. To pay that money to supposedly save I Tunes from becomng irrelevant? Ridiculous. I'm not a big fan of Apple and their mindset but I am now thinking that, like others in the trade have been saying, it looks like they definitely have lost their mojo.
SaneIT
100%
0%
SaneIT,
User Rank: Ninja
5/29/2014 | 7:32:42 AM
Beats
I had not seen the breakdown of what they paid for each part of Beats and it surprises me that they paid so much for Beats' Music service.  It isn't one of the more popular services so unless they have a huge collection of licensed music that seems like an awfully steep price.  I see the Beats electronics headphones all over the place so I can see the name being marketable but maybe not at a $3 billion price tag.


IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest September 24, 2014
Start improving branch office support by tapping public and private cloud resources to boost performance, increase worker productivity, and cut costs.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.