Comments
Aereo Vs. Broadcasters: 5 Questions For Supreme Court
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
EdsonM887
50%
50%
EdsonM887,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/28/2014 | 3:28:54 AM
Satellite tv for pc
Satellite TV For PC software - FREE Satellite TV For Your PC
Free satellite tv for your pc. Satellite TV For PC software technology taps into more than 5,000 TV channels worldwide right over the internet. Simply download our software and you are ready to enjoy over 3,000 channels worldwide. Best satellite tv for your pc online at http://www.wherecaniwatchtv.com

 

 

 

satellite tv for pc satellite tv online internet tv 5000 tv channels satellite tv for pc 2013 internet tv software
stotheco
50%
50%
stotheco,
User Rank: Ninja
6/25/2014 | 3:30:40 PM
Re: Is Aero a content hyjacker?
At this point, it is tempting to say that yes, Aero is definitely a content hijacker. You are right in saying that this is a gray area that it seems they are exploiting. A pretty huge gray area indeed. The outcome of this case will change the landscape of digital streaming/recording for sure.
stotheco
50%
50%
stotheco,
User Rank: Ninja
6/25/2014 | 3:26:55 PM
Re: Won't Change the Bigger Picture
I pay for cable and even the cable company inserts ads during the channel's commercial breaks! It's crazy!
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
6/24/2014 | 12:06:34 PM
Re: Won't Change the Bigger Picture
Hmm, so I wonder, can you DVR (on your own hardware) the content from Aereo and skip commercials? 
Somedude8
100%
0%
Somedude8,
User Rank: Ninja
6/24/2014 | 11:55:54 AM
Re: Won't Change the Bigger Picture
I remember when paying for cable meant getting no commercials. Man, I am old.
rradina
100%
0%
rradina,
User Rank: Ninja
6/24/2014 | 11:17:06 AM
Re: Won't Change the Bigger Picture
Yeah -- the popups are out of control and even the transparent graphics are getting larger and more obnoxious.  It's no longer just branding but brand + an always-present graphic about new episodes for an underperforming but over-hyped series.  I've even seen transparent stuff move around to capture your attention during the content!
Number 6
100%
0%
Number 6,
User Rank: Moderator
6/24/2014 | 10:47:51 AM
Won't Change the Bigger Picture
Regardless of the decision, the increasingly ridiculous number of commercials will continue to drive younger viewers away. Remember when the idea of paying for cable, besides better reception, was fewer commercials on the cable-only channels? Now it's 6 minutes of show... with intrusive pop-up ads for the network's other shows... followed by 4 minutes of commercials. Maybe that's why soccer's increasing in popularity - no commercial breaks.
rradina
100%
0%
rradina,
User Rank: Ninja
6/24/2014 | 9:18:29 AM
Re: Is Aero a content hyjacker?
Can I lease rack space in a city-based ISP that's near the OTA transmitters and install a Sling box?  If I'd be doing something illegal, then Aereo is illegal.  If I'm legal, why is it a grey area for someone to formalize what I can legally do and lease it to me?  Is it who owns the equipment?  Is it where the equipment is?  Is it the scale on which they do it?
rradina
67%
33%
rradina,
User Rank: Ninja
6/24/2014 | 8:33:45 AM
Re: It's not really a tiny antenna...
The link has merit regarding how the tech works but Aereo's primary claim is they lease the equipment to the consumer.  That means the consumer is the one that's converting the RF signal to MPEG, storing it in a "cloud" DVR and transmitting it to their device.  If it's legal for a consumer to own a Sling Box in their home, record content and stream it to their devices, what changes if the equipment isn't in their home and someone else owns it?  Would it be legal for a rural resident with poor signal strength to lease rack space at an ISP in city and duplicate the in-home Sling Box?  If so, what changes when that resident pays someone else to own it and they rent it from them?
rradina
67%
33%
rradina,
User Rank: Ninja
6/24/2014 | 8:07:48 AM
Re: Watching with interest
And...cable companies should. The only problem is they'll still charge the same fee they charge for retransmission except it will be for a remote antenna + DVR service. Needless technology to provide us with something we should get for free. It was a poor decision to let OTA broadcasters charge a fee in the first place.

SCOTUS needs to strike down the retransmission fee and save everyone a lot of hassle. Do we really need to enrich the folks who provide Aereo their tiny antenna's?  That's what will happen if SCOTUS rules Aereo legal and all the cable company's duplicate Aereo's architecture to avoid the fees.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014
Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of November 9, 2014.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.