Comments
Report: Oracle Patch Turns On $23,000 Upgrade
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
D. Henschen
100%
0%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
7/29/2014 | 10:36:49 PM
Oracle's Response
On 7/28, Oracle's Master Product Manager for Oracle Database In-Memory published a detailed, technical blog post that insists that this optional feature is NOT automatically enabled. The optional feature is installed along with the 12.1.0.2 release because it's an intrinsic part of the database, according to Oracle's Maria Colgan, but she wrote that enabling the feature requires a deliberate, two-step process whereby memory is allocated to the feature. Read the details here.
License Consulting
50%
50%
License Consulting,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/29/2014 | 4:36:43 AM
same old same old
This has never been any different. By default Oracle will install and enable most of the options. What's a lot worse, that an innocent Standard Edition One user is able to use Enterprise Edition Options which shouldn't be available in the first place.

For example, an Oracle SE One user can run with 1 Processor license on a single CPU 8-Core Server, at a cost of $5.800 for the Oracle license. But if a dba would run Medium compression instead of Basic compression - even when the V$Option table the Advanced Compression is set on FALSE this will actually work - Oracle will tell the client to buy Database Enterprise Edition and Advanced Security for $236.000.- instead. We've seen Oracle trying to get away with such compliance claims even in situations where the client was able to demonstrate that the DBA only ran compression for testing the feature. So while this article seems alarming, it is one of the more "innocent" traps for Oracle clients. In our experience, the majority of Oracle's claims with regard to Database options are based on false-positives.
TerryB
50%
50%
TerryB,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2014 | 1:54:47 PM
Re: Honor System Vs. Trust-But-Verify
"relies on honor system". Yeah, for one of two reasons, neither which reflect well on Oracle. Either they are too incompetent to build a licensing control system or, most probable, they want you to turn that stuff on accidently so they can charge you for it.

If you are silly enough to deal with Oracle in first place, that stuff comes with territory. The maintenance fee troll of the IT world. I feel very sorry for the JD Edwards customers (and many other vendors Oracle snatched up) who are stuck with these guys when they certainly never intended to be.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
7/25/2014 | 7:04:51 PM
Re: Oracle Acknowledges Optional Feature Ships Turned On
But it this new feature worth $23,000-per-CPU? At that price, I'd be tempted to process the data with pencil and paper.
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
7/25/2014 | 2:45:21 PM
Honor System Vs. Trust-But-Verify
I'm working on a feature on software licensing currently and in a recent interview, IDC analyst Amy Mizoras Konary told me Oracle is one of the few vendors that relies on the honor system, whereby it ships all sorts of software and lets you use it whether you have licensed it or not. It has no mechanisms, other than software audits, to alert you whether you are actually entited to use these features. The danger, or course, is that DBAs and app administrators will install, turn on, and start using all sorts of features only discover in an audit that they owe a lot more than they realized. Negotiated discounts could go out the window, too.

Most vendors take what she called a "trust but verify" approach whereby notifications are triggered when you try to use or install features that you're not currently entitled to use -- or at least the notification will warn you that it's an extra-cost feature that you have to be licensed to use. This helps avoid those audit surprises.


IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Government Tech Digest Oct. 27, 2014
To meet obligations -- and avoid accusations of cover-up and incompetence -- federal agencies must get serious about digitizing records.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of October 26, 2014 and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.