Comments
Wearable Devices: Keep Data Privacy In Check
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
8/18/2014 | 2:24:06 PM
Voluntary slippery slope
One smart device that interests me is the tracker that insurance companies would like us to install in our cars. Currently, these are optional, with the "carrot" being a break on your rates if you're a safe driver as revealed by the device. However, logic dictates that as more drivers accept these devices, insurers will start considering that the norm, cut back on incentives, and penalize those who decline.

One could see the same path being taken by other insurers -- health and homeowners. 
jagibbons
50%
50%
jagibbons,
User Rank: Ninja
8/18/2014 | 4:02:16 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
That is a very real risk, Lorna. The insurance company can say that they don't penalize anyone, but all too often rates go down for the "good participants." That means the non-participants pay higher fees. Not higher than they had before, but higher than they should have. This is a very slippery slope with health insurance too, even as employers are now commonly penalizing poor habits like smoking.
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
8/18/2014 | 5:02:33 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
Right -- it used to be the norm to have a full-service gas station. Then, someone figured out they could do self-serve, shave a nickel off a gallon of gas, people would come for the savings. Well, now, self-serve is the norm and you have to pay to get the service that once was included.

For customers to flock en masse to a "discount" that actually costs them something (either labor or, in this case, privacy) may be a win in the short term. But eventually, it comes back to bite us.
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
8/18/2014 | 6:06:29 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
I like the comparison with cell phones here.

I think that even with the progression in mobile devices to smartphones and tablets we're still evolving the privacy debate.

Wearables will be another precedent, and I have to wonder if wearables will do to mobile devices what the latter did to PCs – it changed the whole game when you really think about it. Interestig stuff if you ask me..
jagibbons
50%
50%
jagibbons,
User Rank: Ninja
8/18/2014 | 7:47:37 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
I think the day of the wearable replacing the cell phone is quite a ways off. The overwhelming trend in cell phones is larger screens, at least for now. Even Apple has caved into the consumer pressure. Wearables, with few exception, don't fit that description. The majority, again with a few exceptions, of wearables still require another device to do most of the real processing. They are evolving, and there are some great use cases out there, but it is still a technology in its infancy.
nomii
50%
50%
nomii,
User Rank: Ninja
8/25/2014 | 1:36:55 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
@Daniel crawry very true. Its about time that few things need to be changed. We do not want to keep our selves possessed with all kind of gadgetry. It creates great difficulty in keeping and handling. I am a great supporter of wearable but we need to find one great all rounder with customized services at the descrition of the user.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
8/18/2014 | 7:28:16 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
I question whether personal data of this sort really needs to be stored in the cloud. You can store quite a bit on a tiny SD card these days. Moving data to the cloud shouldn't be necessary unless you're talking about pictures or videos, which take up lots of space.
jagibbons
50%
50%
jagibbons,
User Rank: Ninja
8/18/2014 | 7:48:38 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
For me, the reason to utilize the cloud is for easy retrieval of my data across multiple devices. This may not apply well to wearables, though. If the device can communicate with my phone and store data there, maybe I don't need it to access the cloud.
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
User Rank: Author
8/20/2014 | 4:18:48 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
Another reason to move wearable data to the cloud, beyond file size, is to share it, Tom. You want to share with your biking group how much you're riding, or with your doctor how much you've been sleeping. But your point is a really good one -- people might start getting more mindful about whether data is cloud or on-device, and not just  default to cloud.   
nomii
50%
50%
nomii,
User Rank: Ninja
8/25/2014 | 1:43:02 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
@Thomas I agree with your point. I believe that most of us has taken wrong notion of cloud services. We are trying to save every little thing on cloud to let go its burden. I believe that few things are quite sensitive to be kept there like health records or your personal information. We need to learn and try to find the best way the tech can benifit us.
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
8/25/2014 | 3:33:58 PM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
Cloud services need to be checked. They can be hacked too. It seems like anywhere we go we cannot find security from hackers unless we cut all digital links around us, which we cannot, so we need better security measures everywhere.
nomii
50%
50%
nomii,
User Rank: Ninja
8/27/2014 | 11:39:05 AM
Re: Voluntary slippery slope
@SachinEE i agee with your observation and feels the same way the stand alone is the best remedy. I feel that any thing on substantial importance are not to be kept on anything shared with internet. BYOD is the best remedy to carry important documents along. Otherwise the way hacking is progressing, I believe we may have to even prove our identity  :)
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
8/19/2014 | 12:57:37 PM
Law
I'd quite like to see some pre-emptive legislation be put in place to govern wearable data. Some of it is just far too sensitive for the whims of new startups with little security experience, or lackadaisical developers to handle it.

I'm usually one for free market principles to dominate and for end user common sense to prevail, but things like health, heart rate signatures, potentially glucose blood levels, this is all information that feels far too personal for a wearable company to have access to and potentially sell on unless I comb through its entire privacy policy before hand. 

I will do of course, but I'd like a solid alternative. 
GAProgrammer
50%
50%
GAProgrammer,
User Rank: Ninja
8/20/2014 | 9:44:38 AM
BYOD quote
"When I ask security experts if they have a BYOD program at work and they say "No," I say, "Yes you do. It's just not authorized."

Actually, we don't. We do not allow any personal devices on our corporate network. Sure, they can access some information from the web that can be accessed on a computer with a browser, but I wouldn't consider that BYOD. Even those cases are very rare, as we have computers everywhere. There is NO BYOD at our company - it's not being naive, it's called network security. No personal device is allowed on the corporate wireless intranet and the guest wireless is on a whole diff Last time I checked, no mobile devices can plug into the physical network. Am I missing something here? Maybe our definitions of BYOD are different?

To the article's point, there was a quote about wearables connecting directly to the internet - I don't know of any. Sure, there are medical sensors that do that, but I don't know if they would be considered a "wearable". It's a good point though - the definition of wearable might not be limited to form.
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
8/25/2014 | 3:30:37 PM
Tokenization can be done
Tokenization from peer to peer i.e. from wearable tech to smartphone to cloud can undergo a quick tokenization procedure that encrypts its data. Maybe not a tough encryption, but enough for the data to travel safely to the cloud. This will ensure safe data delivery.
nomii
50%
50%
nomii,
User Rank: Ninja
8/27/2014 | 11:42:12 AM
Re: Tokenization can be done
@SachinEE I fail to get the tokenization concept usefulness in the encryption process. Can you explain a bit further. It seems a good way
shamika
50%
50%
shamika,
User Rank: Ninja
8/31/2014 | 6:02:40 AM
Mobile
This is an interesting article. Protecting customer data is an important aspect. With the increasing development of mobile technology, there are many apps which are used for easy access and references. Ex: Mobile Banking apps.

 
shamika
50%
50%
shamika,
User Rank: Ninja
8/31/2014 | 6:04:06 AM
Re: Mobile
A recent article explains, free Mobile Security gives you mobile antivirus protection and mobile tracking while concealing itself from would-be thieves.


IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and community news at InformationWeek.com.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.