Comments
Ban On USAID Outsourcing Programs Makes Bipartisan Sense
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SirRuss
50%
50%
SirRuss,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/15/2012 | 5:54:20 PM
re: Ban On USAID Outsourcing Programs Makes Bipartisan Sense
I know the US, as a super power, needs to provide certain development support for countries that need to catch up. The ultimate goal is to allow these countries to support themselves so not to rely on others... That being said, what about us!!! Our tax dollars - expecially for government programs - should be spent on US soil. This is a way to support ourselves. Why do our tax dollars, taxes pay by Americans that are having a hard time finding work, have to go someplace where there is no interest in the US welfare? Why does the government allow companies that get US contracts, to send those dollars over seas to make parts or products that are sent back to the US for use. The government should make a condition of the contract for the parts to be made in the US so the jobs are kept here. The tax dollars need to stimulate the US economy, not foreign countries where the dollars are gone.
We need elected officials that back the US long term. Training programs for the US people out of work, displaces and our college grads.
Come-on, wake up America - your government is not your partner in your future.
Why
dhinkelman069
50%
50%
dhinkelman069,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/14/2012 | 9:37:08 PM
re: Ban On USAID Outsourcing Programs Makes Bipartisan Sense
Hi Paul,
I love muckraking journalism but I think your arguments oversimplify the problem. The solution in overcoming zealotry (whether Christian, Islamic, Jewish, etc.) is education, and education in English is a good way to open people/communities stuck in violent cycles to pursue opportunities beyond the narrow brainwashing of religious schools in places like Pakistan, and possibly Mindanao. There are/were some rich zealots, like Bin Ladin, who are not mired in poverty, but they recruit very poor young people who can be controlled by limited education. I support USAID programs that combat terrorism, and in this case learning English can be good way for moving young people into nursing and other careers that build community. I do not support outsourcing call center jobs, and I do not support "big businesses" profiting from my tax dollars. Calling to end the Mindanao program, however, is shortsighted, reactionary and serves to make good headlines. As the other commentator wrote, we need basic development programs in places like Mindanao, and education, including English education, is a key component.
MyW0r1d
50%
50%
MyW0r1d,
User Rank: Strategist
5/12/2012 | 12:27:29 AM
re: Ban On USAID Outsourcing Programs Makes Bipartisan Sense
I enjoyed the comment by USAID that training them in programming will keep them from turning to terrorism against the US. Could someone brief USAID about cyber terrorism and its expected, ever increasing role on the world stage? Is it better to train them to successively hide code in popular programs to act as a prestaged botnet? Perhaps the AID chief was simply fulfulling the oldest of political strategies, using position to funnel business for pet causes whether they are alumni at a university, jobs for your electorate, or regional/cultural pride.

Perhaps the focus needs to return to teaching basics (government, farming, construction, social development, etc.) in underdeveloped areas instead of state of the art technology in direct competition. But this question goes hand in hand with universities providing subsidized degrees to select foreign nationals who then return to their home to build competitive international businesses while US students are charged full rates or compete for grants, scholarships, and other programs leaving college with years of debt.
lacertosus
50%
50%
lacertosus,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/11/2012 | 5:09:30 PM
re: Ban On USAID Outsourcing Programs Makes Bipartisan Sense
Thanks for bringing this issue to light as I didn't know that my tax dollar was being used to train foreign employees for the benefit of large corporations. This is an absolute insult. I'm in the IS/IT industry for a decade now and have been let go from few places due to outsourcing. Knowing that my tax dollar was spent to train my replacement is adding salt to wound.

This issue is far from being Bipartisan! Republicans will fight this ferociously as they are the main benefactors of outsourcing. They are big business.

It was only few months ago when republicans voted down a bill that would have eleminated tax breaks for corporations that are engaged with offshore outsourcing. Why would they be on board with this now?!


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest September 18, 2014
Enterprise social network success starts and ends with integration. Here's how to finally make collaboration click.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
The weekly wrap-up of the top stories from InformationWeek.com this week.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.