Comments
Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 6   >   >>
hparmar132
50%
50%
hparmar132,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 2:54:54 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
Agreed this verdict should be tossed out.
Drene
50%
50%
Drene,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 3:48:58 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
Apple deffinately did not invent "the touch screen" so they went to the point of trying to label their product as a "work of art".... true colors are hard to mask. It's sad to see how much time and money is wasted in litegation, gotta love the legal bunch, they don't want to change a broken system that they developed, then they would be out of work...
Pathetic.
tonyswash
50%
50%
tonyswash,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 3:59:10 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
Charles Babcocksaid

"What a patent and legal system should aim to prevent is theft by copying, such as stealing the technology of a competitor's product, or creating such a conscious, copycat duplication that one product can be confused with another, thus letting the profits of an originator be taken by an imitator. Samsung did not do this."

That's exactly what they did. Documents revealed in the trial makes it clear that's Samsung planned to copy Apple and then did.
http://nicklazilla.tumblr.com/...
ndgoat
50%
50%
ndgoat,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 4:04:10 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
Couldn't agree more, the verdict is a joke.
ANON1234449176287
50%
50%
ANON1234449176287,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 4:06:16 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
Why aren't their fines or sanctions against companies like Apple that apply for patents for technologies or designs that already exist? Or maybe better yet, give them a 3 strikes and you are suspended for a year or two. If you took the chance of not being able to submit a patent on something that you really did invent and that really did matter because you were abusing the system, there would probably less abuse of the system. Whatever the solution, something has to be done. Hopefully this case will be appealed to a judge that understands the issues and will invalidate the patents that shouldn't have been granted. Then, that great sucking sound you hear will be Apple trying to figure out how they are going to actually compete without abusing the law.
MagFarm
50%
50%
MagFarm,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 4:20:08 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
What did phones look like before iPhone? Apple blew it out of the water. Who was on the board at the time? Google's CEO. Coincidence Android looks almost exactly like iOS? If you think so, then I've got a whole bunch of $100 bills i'll be happy to sell you for $10 each. Way better investment than your home or 401k. Trust me, i'm on the web and form complete sentences so I must know what i'm talking about. So, back to SJ's comment that Android is a stolen product. When the patents were reviewed, prior art is documented and considered. The people that had the facts in front of them and at their fingertips thought these were unique. But I'm sure a journalist who's never designed or built anything original (other than a moderately researched opinion) and the web's peanut gallery (who could really use better spell checkers) have better access to the facts that were considered or not than the people that were paid to review and approve them. We should skip the whole patent and court thing and just let you guys make the call. Idiots.
1954 Stratocaster
50%
50%
1954 Stratocaster,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 4:21:32 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
"First, let's kill all the lawyers."
--William Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part II
ETi
50%
50%
ETi,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 4:24:25 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
The verdict is not a joke. It was serious, it's based on patents awarded in a "broken patent system". Per the excellent content of the article, I think Samsung in their appeal should also sue the US Patent Office to invalidate the patents given to Apple. The problem must be fixed at its root.
Richard_Bentley
50%
50%
Richard_Bentley,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 4:34:07 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
In terms of the patent system, there are three basic problems: the liberal legal interpretation of what constitutes a patent violation; the patentability of very low level items, such as icons on a screen and glass screens; and the length of time a product can be patented. All software should have a finite and reasonable expiration date which will take into account cost recoveries and profit before it is allowed to go generic. The same should be true for hardware. A related example is the copyright rules on published material. No book published since 1922 is in the public domain. That is excessive. In the case of products that are in continuous development, a short turnaround on the the length of the patent is needed. An example that comes to mind is motherboards. They basically have a production life of little more than a year or so, but the patent remains in place. There is no reason why some third party should not be able to produce the same board if there is enough demand for it, and it has been dropped by the original manufacturer. One need to look no further than the SCO linux patent trolling debacle that was originated exclusively to obtain license fees fraudulently to see how ludicrous the suits routinely filed by proprietary companies such as Apple really are. Yet they win settlements because in part of the legal expenses involved for the other party, and in part because the law is firmly on their side - laws that have needed to be completely revised for years. And probably will never be, because of the attitudes of corporations.
deckar01
50%
50%
deckar01,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/31/2012 | 4:40:04 PM
re: Apple Worked A Broken Patent System
As an undergraduate studying Computer Science I was given the opportunity to implement a patent granted for an image compression algorithm as a paid internship. After 2 weeks of programming, studying the patent, and reviewing the history of image compression, I found the patent inferior to algorithms published in the 1970s.

I could not believe the patent holder was allowed to use statements like "An improved digital halftoning method..." (http://www.freepatentsonline.c...

I was ultimately fired for trying to discuss problems with the patent.
Page 1 / 6   >   >>


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A UBM Tech Radio episode on the changing economics of Flash storage used in data tiering -- sponsored by Dell.
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.