Apple's Non-Apology Annoys Judge - InformationWeek
Apple's Non-Apology Annoys Judge
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
11/6/2012 | 5:55:04 AM
re: Apple's Non-Apology Annoys Judge
This article made me laugh several time throughout, I do think the judge is pushing the limits of the law by reordering a new one be written. Apple's apology was voided by the last paragraph, The judge asked for an apology not a history on what the rest of the legal world decided by referencing earlier decisions. That was a slap in the face to the judge and he caught it and no judge like being told that their decision is wrong regardless of the basis. I don't understand hey Apple needed 14 days to rewrite it other than to let that apology linger in the world for a bit before changing it.

Paul Sprague
InformationWeek Contributor
User Rank: Ninja
11/5/2012 | 3:33:22 PM
re: Apple's Non-Apology Annoys Judge
Sure they have every right to tell their users etc. that other courts have found differently, they just should not have done it in the apology document.

I do think the idea that the judge ruled Apple had to apologize was ridiculous. As has been stated in other articles I have read it is like when your mother made you apologize for hitting your sister everyone knows the apology is not sincere so it is a wasted effort.

If the judge really wanted to do something he would have made Apple pay some or all of Samsung's legal costs.
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2012 | 2:11:58 AM
re: Apple's Non-Apology Annoys Judge
As a retired attorney, I laugh at this as totally asinine, arrogant behavior on the part of this Judge. Apple complied word-for-word with his order as to what was to be published. Then freedom of speech applies. The Judge has NO business prohibiting Apple from directly quoting from the Judge's comments in explaining his decision! Nor has he authority to prohibit Apple from telling its customers and shareholders what other courts in other countries have ruled. Another Little Lord Fauntleroy in the court system!
User Rank: Apprentice
11/1/2012 | 7:47:05 PM
re: Apple's Non-Apology Annoys Judge
All that is so stupid and we the consumers have to pay for it. Apple has great products but what they are doing is too much and I would love to boycott them but I can't.


This comment is sponsered by:

How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2017 State of the Cloud Report
As the use of public cloud becomes a given, IT leaders must navigate the transition and advocate for management tools or architectures that allow them to realize the benefits they seek. Download this report to explore the issues and how to best leverage the cloud moving forward.
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on for the week of November 6, 2016. We'll be talking with the editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week to get the "story behind the story."
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll