Comments
Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Verdumont Monte
50%
50%
Verdumont Monte,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/4/2013 | 3:55:56 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
Can't the files used for so called "self-healing", reside in a centralized location, atleast in an enterprise setting? It has been well demonstrated with iOS and Andriod that this model does work. All the binaries are stored at the Appstore / Andriod Play store, and reinstall solves the problem 99% and remainint 1% is solved by clearing the application data. For example, Netflix app got stuck in the loading screen and all I had to do was to deactivate from their website and enter the login info again. BTW, it has been done at my previous employer. They disabled caching of O2K10 install files and have it refer to a centralized share.
bretus
50%
50%
bretus,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/3/2013 | 12:33:36 AM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
The Cloud is not every where. It is fine for city dwellers but out in the field in a lot af instances it doesnt exist.
Its only as good as the 3g reception.There are plenty of black spots even in the cities which have verry poor speeds
A 250 GB SSD is not new technoligy it is a cheaper upgrade than SDXC
When im working i dont want to depend on streaming data that should already be on my tablet, that is inefficient.Because of the small SSD I would be operating from SDXC having to swap them around.
My 3 year old Nokia N900 can manage it why can't Surface Pro
I dont want to buy a device that will be at full capacity from day one
The Surface Pro is a competitor for the macbook air or similar not the ipad. The Surface RT would be copetitor for ipad.
The point is would you pay an extra $100 AU for a 250GB SSD.
Even if microsoft made $0 on the upgrade it would translate to a lot more sales. Perception is everything.
AustinIT
50%
50%
AustinIT,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/2/2013 | 2:29:36 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
I really don't get the complaints about Pro. For once you have a tablet device with dual personalities (tablet/laptop) that runs the full blown Windows OS, has 128Gb of faster and more reliable SSD (vs. spinning disk) storage, has an SD slot, has USB 3 on board, and connects to cloud storage via either SkyDrive or Sharepoint. Try getting all that on an iPad.

Any OS with installed programs is going to suck up disk space. More SSD storage equals more space and more cost. So compromises are inevitable in the tablet sized devices. You can thank the SSD drive makers for the limitations and extra expense. Don't blame MS or Apple, etc. for that.
bretus
50%
50%
bretus,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/2/2013 | 1:02:08 AM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
My mistake about SDXC slot, previous articals have stated that only the RT had SDXC. So would have to get a catogery 6 or higher SDXC card for performance.
Which makes it expensive space.Much prefer larger hard drive
Would you buy a laptop with 128GB drive?
I dont want my files on the cloud for my own reasons
And plug in space just isnt good enough
The little bit of space that it does have will soon be gobbled up with updates ect
The surface Pro should have been released with a minimun 250GB plus SDXC slot
Buy the time i put my apps on this divice there wont be much left
This makes the Surface Pro a Failure
Why have a laptop proccessor and operating system on a device with slightly more storage than a mobile phone.
My Nokia N900 has 96GB of space and i can still increase it to 160GB
Which is the reason for looking at the pro because i want a larger screen to run my apps on... most of them being diagnostic
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
2/1/2013 | 10:57:27 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
It'll be interesting to see how Surface Pro gets received and used. I can appreciate the viewpoint that says it's ludicrous to clog up 70% of the SSD with the OS, and that SD Cards are cumbersome additional steps that make the device more difficult than it should be. But if I also think about whether I'd enjoy using one, carrying an SD card or a flash drive doesn't seem like THAT big a deal. Inconvenient, sure, but not a deal-breaker. It makes me think of Canon DSLRs a little, which often look uninspired on paper but generally handle better than other options in practice. I'm not saying Surface Pro will end up similarly, with the device fitting a need so well that users overlook its lesser characteristics. In fact, I think it's more likely that a group of people is going to remain dismayed by the storage issue regardless. But I think Surface Pro can gain fans in certain quarters, and it'll be interesting to see how many.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
2/1/2013 | 10:47:04 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
Thanks for the comment, GAProgrammer. You bring up a good point that probably should have been emphasized somewhere in the article: the Surface Pro has a built-in customer base because it snugly fits a certain, important segment's needs. As a corporate-owned device distributed to employees, it will see a lot of use. But I think Orr has a point in the article about Microsoft's retails intentions, which suggest the company has bigger (i.e. BYOD) aspirations. The million-unit initial shipment shows that Microsoft isn't betting the farm on consumer appeal, but I think they hope it becomes more than an IT favorite. We'll see, though.

Good call with the cannibalization comment. It would have been more accurate to say analysts expect minimal cannibalization. Given the high SSD margins they'll be enjoying alongside whatever cannibalization occurs, I suspect Apple will be happy however it shakes down.

Michael Endler
InformationWeek Associate Editor
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
2/1/2013 | 10:07:49 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
Thanks for the comment, Leo. I think "snafu" is defensible (this definition, for example, seems to fit many reactions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...,

Diction aside, you're right: Microsoft was no doubt aware of the storage situation when they designed the Surface Pro. If MS had marketed the capacity a bit more transparently, I don't think there'd be any discussion. As many people (and the article) have pointed out, iPads can be just as limiting in terms of storage. Storage capacity will be a big deal for some, but for others, I don't think the issue is usable space, per se, so much as the vibe Microsoft has given off in its marketing.

I like the Surface RT and have little doubt that the Surface Pro will be a capable device. But I think Microsoft needs to manage its messaging. Given the Surface RT lawsuit, this storage mess was pretty foreseeable.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
2/1/2013 | 7:21:45 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
After spending thousand bucks I don't want to add more storage just to get use of the Pro - no matter how easy it is.
avwidw
50%
50%
avwidw,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/1/2013 | 6:47:00 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
...read the article:
"additional memory can easily be added via Surface Pro's microSDXC card slot and USB 3.0 port, and that SkyDrive, Microsoft's cloud service, provides additional options."
MyW0r1d
50%
50%
MyW0r1d,
User Rank: Strategist
2/1/2013 | 4:12:28 PM
re: Microsoft Surface Pro Storage Snafu: Does It Matter?
Storage has been an issue on these limited devices. At least there is a SD card slot and USB capability in recognition of the limitation (my iPad has none of that). I've always archived to external USB devices since they were available for long term stability through the evolution of jobs, laptops and PCs as they are replaced.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - September 10, 2014
A high-scale relational database? NoSQL database? Hadoop? Event-processing technology? When it comes to big data, one size doesn't fit all. Here's how to decide.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.