Comments
Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 5   >   >>
Johnnythegeek
50%
50%
Johnnythegeek,
User Rank: Strategist
3/21/2013 | 1:49:30 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
I imagine she looked at the results and login information and realized many are not properly communicating with the rest of their teams. Some people are good managing time on their own and know how to work from home. Some simply find the temptation to put things off or become introverted a side effect of working outside the office. Mayer to me simply wants to reset this issues and possibly weed out those who have developed a distaste for working as a team.
Its very possible that down the road those that show they can be productive as a BYOD would possibly be given some more freedom to not have to go to the office everyday?
GAProgrammer
50%
50%
GAProgrammer,
User Rank: Strategist
3/14/2013 | 1:15:31 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
I don't disagree with either of you. My point is that the expectation of being able to telecommute is selfish. Just because it is possible doesn't mean that the company HAS to allow it. Lorna even proves my point - I can work from home and start my own company, at which point I will leave the current one. Sounds like a good reason to NOT allow it. Especially if I am enabling a new competitor LOL.
mstock4941
50%
50%
mstock4941,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/5/2013 | 3:18:32 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
It's true: you never said in your article that collaborative tools can't be highly effective or that work at home policies are a bad idea. But I would expect from these pages a more balanced view. For a company like Yahoo image is as equally important - in certain ways - as keeping morale and hopefully employees. A sudden edict which contradicts what the company supposedly stands for is a bit startling and should be called out as such. It's true as well that I wouldn't want anyone to simply harangue the CEO for a decision you (or me personally) wouldn't agree with since we're not in that role. I just hope that her decision produces results, enhances the brand, increases morale and doesn't send good people to other places, like Google or Microsoft.

Thanks for reading and responding to my post!
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
3/4/2013 | 9:04:05 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
Come on now. I never, ever said collaborative technology tools can't be highly effective and productive. And I never said work-at-home policies are a bad idea--I noted that my own company and lots of others have very successful ones, made possible by the latest tech tools. But my company and likely your company isn't Yahoo. What's good for us isn't necessarily good for them. Yahoo is in trouble and the CEO is trying to shake things up and remold the culture. Her move may work; it may not. We'll see.
mstock4941
50%
50%
mstock4941,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/4/2013 | 8:00:56 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
I find this article quite hypocritical. These pages are typically supporting such up-to-date ideas as virtual meetings and electronic collaboration. I find such unquestionable support from you for a Back-To-The-Office policy from a tech-leader extremely distasteful. Next week I will expect you to extol the virtues of steam engines and the fax machine.

I think we all get the idea of hallway meetings and ad hoc idea-gatherings as potentially useful - there are times when face-to-face is very valuable, even critical. But contributing to the culture? It would seem that this policy just set the culture back to the 1970s.

I could see having office time once or twice a week. You get the benefit of the culture and whatever face time you consciously make time for - the rest is heads-down work time. You can find all the studies you want that show the results you need to make your case either way.

Regardless of the reasons, the message this policy sends to her workforce - and to the rest of us is that Yahoo, tech leader and innovator, just went back in time. Perhaps the CEO felt this was necessary as a management decision, but it doesn't send a very promising message in terms of vision, innovation or technology. It actually weakens the Yahoo brand in my eyes. I trust the company less today because of it. But there wasn't a word of caution from you.

What will you condone in your next article? Leaving your work phone on your boss' desk when you go home? Company-sanctioned stations on Sirius XM in your company car?

Waving the flag so high for this policy is the same as pining for the days of print-only editions of newspapers and magazines. Of course, in that case you didn't have to get feedback like this!
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Strategist
3/4/2013 | 7:34:27 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
Many comments assume reassembly will work, or social networking for telecommuters will work. For what purpose? What culture is being fostered in place of the old Yahoo culture? I don't know exactly because I'm not in the CEO's office or close to responsible employees, but I know I support measures that will revitalize Yahoo as a competitor, and those measures may need to be drastic. The private nursery issue is a morale issue, for sure, in the eyes of affected Yahoo employees, but judgments on it suppose that the CEO needs to be treated or act like every other employee. Much as I dislike the deification of the CEO, he or she is not just another employee; some acknowledgement of that at a distressed company may be in order.
ANON1237925156805
50%
50%
ANON1237925156805,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/4/2013 | 4:42:01 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
I find this article to be spot on. From the outside it has certainly felt as though one cause?/consequences? of Yahoo's floundering over the past few years has been the lack of a clear identity. You can't just shoot a dart at a dartboard and say OK, this is how we'll react to the new reality. You have to say this is who we are and this is what we do in the new reality.

That can't come from the top down. No matter what course senior management adopts, there has to be a cohesive underlying corporate culture to back up the promises and slogans with enthusiastic and effective execution. I can understand why Yahoo mgmt may feel that for now that means that employess need to be in the office for that to happen..

No disputing that social media, networking applications and the ability to telecommute effectively are wondrous things. Everyone benefits when commute time goes away and when that trip to the pediatrician can be a long lunch instead of a full day off. Still it shouldn't even need to be stated that an IM, a Webex, a Skype conference call, even a corporate social network-none of these are replacements for actual human contact.

My current experience is illustrative. I've happily worked from home 2-3 days a week for several years. I've always gone into the office when it mattered and I've always been allowed to be at home when it mattered. When I'm at home, I work more not less. When I'm in the office I network more effectively. Win-win.

For the past six months I've been forced to work at home full time. A temporary family situation was immediately followed by superstorm Sandy-which severely damaged my office building. I've got all the tools I need at my disposal and on the surface things are going smoothly. But I'm feeling more and more out of the swim, disconnected. It's getting harder and harder to motivate myself to perform optimally. I'm looking forward to our reopening in two weeks.

I can imagine the drift that's been happening in a company that didn't have effective controls with hundreds of employees who never came in at all, some of them apparently logged in for foreshortened hours. I can fully understand why it may be necessary for now to take away this privilege to get things in order.

One hopes that they'll take advantage of this new policy to consciously work to break down silos, to improve networking and communication among employees. One also hopes that they'll evaluate the child care issue sooner than later. Finally one hoeps that as soon as it makes sense they'll evolve to a more flexible strategy that supports telecommuting on a part-time basis at least for those whose job descriptions, personal situations and work ethic warrant it.
NJ Mike
50%
50%
NJ Mike,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/4/2013 | 2:07:46 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
If Yahoo! employees have been using work time to start build-ups, they have violated the trust that is required to work at home. If that is the case, don't blame Mayer for firing the shot across the bow, can she be blamed for not trusting employees who shouldn't be trusted?
edyang
50%
50%
edyang,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/2/2013 | 5:57:45 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
It's very difficult to take away what employees consider "entitlements" as opposed to them not having had it at all in the first place. The problems at Yahoo! seem to go much deeper. Some other article I read said that Mayer was displeased with how late employees arrived and how early they left. That's an issue of culture and less so about telecommuting. I believe that, yes, this may further damage morale in a company where it is dangerously low already. Agreed that Mayer has the right and ability to try and import the "Google culture" to Yahoo! but that doesn't necessarily make it a good idea.

Even back in 2003 I was working with director and VP level executives at Microsoft and HP who not only telecommuted, they worked full time virtually from locales far from Redmond and Cupertino. How much easier is it to do now with widespread tools like Skype, Google Docs, Google Hangout, Dropbox, YouSendIt, productivity measurement software MySammy, time card iPhone apps, GotomyPC and on and on?

One good thing to come out of this supposed flap is a massive increase in dialogue about working arrangements in companies. But I fear that this may give others the excuse to eliminate telecommuting for their workers as well. I hope this is not the case.
edyang
50%
50%
edyang,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/2/2013 | 5:47:08 PM
re: Yahoo Flap Misses The Bigger Point
Nick, putting words in the writer's mouth is not very honorable either. If you're going to quote Rob, at least do it accurately.
Page 1 / 5   >   >>


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek - July 21, 2014
Our new survey shows fed agencies focusing more on security, as they should, but they're still behind the times with cloud and overall innovation.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
In this special, sponsored radio episode we’ll look at some terms around converged infrastructures and talk about how they’ve been applied in the past. Then we’ll turn to the present to see what’s changing.
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.