Comments
Welcome To The New InformationWeek
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Milano_ice
50%
50%
Milano_ice,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/6/2013 | 2:49:50 PM
New IW format
What took you soooooo long!
Lasse TL912
50%
50%
Lasse TL912,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/27/2013 | 6:46:24 AM
Integration IT with strategies
Thank you for inviting me as GEO,CIO,owner of Vidorg (Uppsala,Sweden so far) to your new Information Week.

Your site has a good design and the IT-strategy by combination of different communities,educational happenings and conferences plus possibility to download usefull whitepapers/reports is right too.

In my company building for Vidorg- an organization consulting company for developing further different "apps" (not IT-apps so far but models,theories as Iḿ philosopher and social scientist by my education) for the new paradigm of science,I have used the same kind of strategies too.Fe. ads in local newspapers,blogging in Swedish (in my www.vidorghelps.blogspot.se) and in English (in http://ltlvidorg1.wordpress.com/) ,comments in the main local newspapers at the country level such as Dagens Nyheter and Svenska Dagbladet,but even occasionally internationally on GM blogg, Bloomsberry,etc.

The Vidorg company slogan "Integration in the wide meaning" means to me trying to cast my nets on the different "frontiers" of science,politics,business life and culture too.In science I have not had success to get interest for the grounding ideas of the new paradigm of science (containing the many-dimensional view of reality and man)-probably because stopped in my career in the basic level when asking different kinds of questions or creating a new,broader kind of ground in philosophy which is behind our sciences building their axiomatic bases (in physics fe. the basic ontological view of reality consisting of different,separate parts or particles,with no basic connection or unity between each other) and thus not a Ph.dr.

In politics I have tried to help (and get company work too) fe. in USA (health care reforms by my own kind of HC Exchange,using my new M.O.-derivate instrument in different hc-company projects or offers,which is a broader view than the settled one by USA-government and legistlation),in Sweden (by presenting a new form of planning and budget systems using IT-,organisation consulting and strategic interviews of the political CEOś in the Swedish county-system-in my SINUS project 1990-2012).My integrational view has even casts nets on the EU (European community)-level by presenting another kind of "integrative view" from the same kind of perspective as Information Week is doing now.

In cultural life-another "frontier" of mine-and possibly of Vidorg (the mother company) too in e-business of my poems,essays etc. (mainly in Swedish) with the help of Amazon publishing is possibly the last frontier if the broad integration doesn t work on the former ones: in science,politics,business life.

But never mind- by visiting your interesting site and learning by another CIOś and great business leaders I hope to continue the broad line of integration and have success in the end.

Good luck for your work at Information Week and thank you


Lasse T. Laine

CEO,CIO,company owner Vidorg (Uppsala,Sweden)
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
11/21/2013 | 3:35:47 PM
Re: Congrats on the relaunch!
Ellis, we've got the request in for the spellchecker. And thanks for the kind note.
Stephanie W
50%
50%
Stephanie W,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2013 | 10:32:43 AM
The value of interaction
While I understand and recognise Somedude8's point, I like the idea of interacting with thought leaders and discussing the issues currently facing the industry. I see great value in that; I am also greatly impressed with the breadth of information covered. Healthcare is my monster, so the more information and conversation about our industry's demons, the better.
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
11/19/2013 | 9:34:43 AM
Re: Where is the value?
It's an excellent point, Somedude8. I'm not suggesting that tech journalism is over. Far from it. I'm suggesting that it's not ALL one-way. As I noted in the video above -- and it's a point I should have reinforced in my written piece above -- our editors, who are indeed subject matter experts, are still doing the journalistic heavy lifting. The likes of Charlie Babcock, Doug Henschen, Tom Claburn, Wyatt Kash, Dave Carr and Chris Murphy are the best in the business. Unlike lots of other media outlets, we're still doing the critical reporting and research and analysis. And we vet and edit every outside contributor (apart from the comments) on our site. We care a great deal about editorial quality, depth and integrity. It's not a free-for-all. But we also understand that we don't know it all. We want to get some (quality) outside voices into the discussion as well. 

 
Somedude8
50%
50%
Somedude8,
User Rank: Ninja
11/18/2013 | 9:08:01 PM
Where is the value?
IMO, you may be underestimating the value of this to folks like me:
"... the old, one-way publishing model of business technology journalism "

There is an underlying assumption, one that is usually correct, that the professional tech journalist is going to be a subject matter expert. Reading articles written by subject matter experts in various IT disciplines provides tremendous value to me. Reading the opinions of my contemporaries may provide some interesting perspective, but nowhere near the value of the most of the articles I find on Information Week.

Put another way, I can go to the water cooler, either physical or virtual, and get more opinions about current IT trends etc than a person would ever need. Providing what *sounds like* will amount to yet another virtual water cooler isn't something I really need. It may prove useful from time to time, but what carries much more weight to me is the articles written by profession IT journalists.

I just can't see how 'multiway discourse' (great new buzzword BTW, can I use that in the next meeting?) will provide value much above what I already have available from countless outlets.
Shane M. O'Neill
50%
50%
Shane M. O'Neill,
User Rank: Author
11/18/2013 | 6:07:52 PM
Re: just awful
If you choose to view comments in "Threaded" view, responses appear under the comments they are responding to.
mak63
100%
0%
mak63,
User Rank: Ninja
11/18/2013 | 1:54:24 PM
Re: just awful
I'll be more considerate in the future. Sorry about that.
RobPreston
100%
0%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
11/18/2013 | 12:01:30 PM
Re: just awful
In response to mak63's criticisms, I would just ask that you bear with us. No website platform and design overhaul is going to come out of the gate flawlessly. This will be an interative process--we'll evaluate your and others' suggestions and make changes. There's a reason I asked for feedback, negative and positive. Just be gentle!
samicksha
50%
50%
samicksha,
User Rank: Strategist
11/18/2013 | 11:01:04 AM
Re: Job Well Done!
This is amazing restructing, presentation is rocking, number of information tabs under one roof..more of new learning on way...Thanx IW
Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014
Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.