Comments
Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
cathaa
50%
50%
cathaa,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2013 | 6:50:05 AM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
I've been trying and trying to find something good about this wretched change and frankly I can't. None of your pros are enough to make up for the fact that I can only view 5 lines (and that's on the enlarged compose screen) at any one time - makes it jolly annoying to have to keep scrolling up and and down to read what I've typed. I absolutely hate it to the point I'm trying out other email options. I'm quite prepared to give Gmail the flick and I too have been a user since the invitation days.
sdelinger
50%
50%
sdelinger,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/31/2013 | 5:19:09 PM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
I've always been using a new window to edit a new message (and referencing other emails): keyboard shortcuts on, Shift-C for New Compose Window. COMPLETELY agree that the new window sucks, especially requiring mouse/trackpad intervention to CC or BCC. I guess we can expect more of this when IM users program email interfaces?
CcolinP
50%
50%
CcolinP,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/4/2013 | 3:55:33 PM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
Good points all with the pros, but the con of the CC/BCC being sort of hidden is a HUGE con for me. Instead of being able to hit "tab" and keep typing email addresses in the cc line, I have to grab for my mouse, click cc, then get back to typing. I need to send emails quickly, Google! I need this functionality! Help!

Worth noting, I think, that this would be a very easy change.
Deb Donston-Miller
50%
50%
Deb Donston-Miller,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/4/2013 | 8:37:38 AM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
Thanks, Leo. You make a great point about contacts and tasks.

Deb Donston-Miller
Contributing Editor, The BrainYard/InformationWeek
Deb Donston-Miller
50%
50%
Deb Donston-Miller,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/4/2013 | 8:36:36 AM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
Thanks for the comment, and I did the search thing, too, to see how far back my Gmail usage went. At first it was a secondary email system for me, but now that I am a freelancer, I use it almost exclusively. I do use Outlook on occasion, and I would argue that there are many elements to it that are unintuitive--I think we've all just been trained really well.

Deb Donston-Miller
Contributing Editor, The BrainYard/InformationWeek
Deb Donston-Miller
50%
50%
Deb Donston-Miller,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/4/2013 | 8:33:22 AM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
Thanks for your comment! I have had problems, as well, with not being able to get a message or message content back if accidentally deleted. And, you're right--you're kind of at Google's mercy in terms of direct complaints, although I am sure they are "hearing" all of the negative talk about the new compose feature. I can see that I am in the minority in terms of liking it, at least based on the comments I have seen.

Deb Donston-Miller
Contributing Editor, The BrainYard/InformationWeek
pwp3
50%
50%
pwp3,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/3/2013 | 6:17:21 AM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
What a stinker! New Gmail Compose looks like a clumsy, dysfunctional beta-1 implementation.

Google, what are you doing? Is composing on a tiny window in the bottom corner some genius 15 year old's brilliant idea of progress, to make Gmail look like a messaging app?

In Google Apps which is pitched at paying business users, this is a killer. Please fix this deeply unpopular anomaly immediately. Don't be evil...you promised
AndrewRoberts
50%
50%
AndrewRoberts,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/2/2013 | 10:32:54 PM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
Thanks for the great analysis!

At Textbox.io have developed a browser extension which solves a lot of the complaints with the new Gmail Compose and lets you get the best of both worlds.

I have blogged about our solution at http://bit.ly/12dKoc8 and posted a video at http://youtu.be/HzOGrdpsnmg
Cara Latham
50%
50%
Cara Latham,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/2/2013 | 2:28:46 PM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
To me, the change is minor. I've also been a Gmail users since the invite-only days. Maybe this is because I am so used to Facebook making much more dramatic changes that a minor change elsewhere seems to be much more readily acceptable -- as if to say, "At least it wasn't as dramatic as..." But I do agree with the idea that the changes should have been more intuitive, as some comments have already mentioned.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
4/1/2013 | 8:39:57 PM
re: Gmail's New Compose: 5 Pros and Cons
Those are new features? Email clients like Thunderbird can do that since forever...and they can do that even offline! And TB works fine with a gmail address. Why rely on the cloud when there are real client apps?
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and community news at InformationWeek.com.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.