Comments
Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jaysimmons
50%
50%
jaysimmons,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/12/2013 | 11:59:01 PM
re: Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
I was thinking the same thing. Getting your product ONC certified for MU Attestation could be an even bigger pain than trying to modify existing products. Couple that with the potential lack of interoperability with other systems and things start getting messy. I do like the fact that you can tailor your product from start to finish to fit your exact needs though.

Jay Simmons
Information Week Contributor
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
User Rank: Author
9/6/2013 | 4:24:02 PM
re: Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
Another pain point here is integration and data interoperability, and that pushes people toward off the shelf and single-vendor options. My hunch is that regulatory pressure likewise pushes people toward off the shelf options. These outfits are bucking the tide.
Alex Kane Rudansky
50%
50%
Alex Kane Rudansky,
User Rank: Author
9/4/2013 | 9:50:22 PM
re: Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
Landmark told me they don't receive much (if any) federal funding to meet MU standards because they are a group of long term acute care hospitals. That might explain it.
Alex Kane Rudansky
50%
50%
Alex Kane Rudansky,
User Rank: Author
9/4/2013 | 9:46:30 PM
re: Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
I think cost is a big factor here, too. It's expensive to buy into those off the shelf options, let alone customize them. Great point about regulatory pain - a question I will be pursuing!
fpoggio600
50%
50%
fpoggio600,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/4/2013 | 8:31:27 PM
re: Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
Based on a quick look at the ONC Certified product list I could not find Chartpad or Landmark (as the vendor) listed as a certified product. That means it cannot be used to meet MU Attestation. Developing your own system is one thing, getting the feds to certifiy it is another.
Frank Poggio
THe Kelzon Group
kelzongroup.com
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
9/4/2013 | 8:04:24 PM
re: Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
Alex, I wonder how this fits in with the regulation pain that plagues healthcare CIOs. Less pain to make homegrown solution meet regulatory needs than customize off the shelf option?
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
9/4/2013 | 4:09:34 PM
re: Why Hospitals Still Build Their Own Health IT
I wonder how many hospital IT pros would say following this path is a mistake.


The Agile Archive
The Agile Archive
When it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Government, May 2014
Protecting Critical Infrastructure: A New Approach NIST's cyber-security framework gives critical-infrastructure operators a new tool to assess readiness. But will operators put this voluntary framework to work?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.