Comments
How Would You Fix HealthCare.gov?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
12/9/2013 | 1:36:00 PM
Re: Its not like this was the first IT Project mankind attempted
@Pmasarik, great commentary, thank you.
dogcat
50%
50%
dogcat,
User Rank: Guru
12/8/2013 | 10:27:19 PM
It's a political/managerial problem, not technical
While it's true that the private sector have large scale failed IT projects, the cause of private vs public sector (and especially the Federal area) have some significant differences, though some are the same. In the Federal government, high level agency or department heads are often political appointees, who have no or little experience in the agency, or managing large enterpeises at all. In house career Federal employees who might have years of experience and organization domain experience and knowlede are ignored.  It's the patronage, or spoils sytem. Recall in Katrina episode that former President Bush told America that "Brownie was dong a great job."

So, Number 1, incompetence at the highest levels. In the private sector, while this does happen, it is much less frequent. The President and his agency chief clearly were not watching this high profile project.

Secondly, number 2, the Federal government's purchasing and expendiures are not based on the same principles as in the private sector. Federal procurement has an economic stimulus and social function, to support and encourage businesses. The procurement process is moribund in many, but not not all agencies. Large Federal contractors are making $Billions feeding at the Federal trough, while Federal employees are criticized.

Number 3, outsourcing. Given number 2 above, developing and nurturing in house Federal employee skill and competence is actually discouraged, in favor of paying twice as much for contractors, who will pass the buck and maximize their profit. In the private sector, one tries to minimize expense. In the current Federal set up, the contractor's goal is to increase costs.

Col. Mark Douglas' put down on our having a competent government in favor of feeding government contractors because of the 'inherant goverment' kanard is just a bogus red herring used to subvert govenment to become a lackie to coporations. It is not in the constitution. Eisenhower warned about the 'military industrial' complex, which can now be expanded to the 'business industrial' complex, or medical-business complex.

Critics of governement ought to at least realize why it is so imcompetent, because it profits many by being that way, and thus it is kept cripled to the advantage of some, and loss to others.


What is pathetic about this failure is that it is totally self inflicted by our highest level leaders.

Some folks will be making a lot of money in over budget costs on this fiasco. The question is not techincal, or whether to shut down for repairs or fix in flight, (those questions are moot, and techie questions, but not project mangement questions) but rather how can top government leaders be so incompetent and why have we allowed our governament to be taken over by corporations that have only their own private interests at stake? And how have we allowed our system to reward self serving interests while ignoring the commong good?

It's a total contradiction that a private entity, like a government contractor, with its own profit-seeking-at-all-costs motivation be able to deliver a service for the common good that is not to its own advantage. And, it's not that self interest profit seeking is bad, it's just deluded to expect action contracy to its own charter and interest.

 
dogcat
50%
50%
dogcat,
User Rank: Guru
12/8/2013 | 10:19:17 PM
Re: Its not like this was the first IT Project mankind attempted
While it's true that the private sector has large scale failed IT projects, the cause of private vs public sector (and especially the Federal area) IT project failures have some significant differences, though some are the same. In the Federal government, high level agency or department heads are often political appointees, who have no or little experience in the agency, or managing large enterpeises at all. It's the patronage, or spoiles sytem. Recall in Katrina episode that former President Bush told America that "Brownie was dong a great job."

So, Number 1, incompetence at the highest levels. In the private sector, whild this does happen, it is much less frequnt.

Secondly, number 2, the Federal government's purchasing and expendiures are not based on the same principles as in the private sector. Federal procurement has an economic stimulus and social function, to support and encourage businesses. The procurement process is moribund in many, but not not all agencies. Large Federal contractors are making $Billions feeding at the Federal trough, while Federal employees are criticized.

 

Number 3, outsourcing. Given number 2 above, developing and nurturing in house Federal employee skill and competence is actually discouraged, in favor of paying twice as much for contractors, who will pass the buck and maximize their profit. In the private sector, one tries to minimize expense. In the current Federal set up, the contractor's goal is to increase costs.

Some folkes will be making a lot of money in over budget costs on this fiasco. The question is not techincal, or whether to shut down for repairs or fix in flight, but rather how can top government leaders be so incompetent? This is just one example.

 
Pmasarik
100%
0%
Pmasarik,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/7/2013 | 10:34:47 AM
Its not like this was the first IT Project mankind attempted
There is some really great commentary posted on this site most of which hits the nail on the head.
---------------------------------------------------------------
As an Information Management & Technology professional for many years, what runs through my mind is.....WOW. Will wonders never cease?

So here it is, yet another failed IT Project - or maybe call it a project with IT failings - and a very publicized one at that making a horrible situation even worse and now there are millions of opinions to be listened to - and as we all know how useful that is.....NOT   

Its not like this was the first IT Project mankind  attempted


What is inexcusable is the failing to do it right from the beginning. When these things occur, and Phase-VI of the project gets underway - Hunt for the Guilty - it always comes back to the beginning where we find one big messy ball of over-managed-everything by people who should not have been involved to begin with, yet there it is...and a mind-set of 'we've done something like this before.. lets get started...we got a deadline to meet'
 
And to help with the 20/20 hindsight lesson lets see if we can get a peek at 
1). the envisioned end-state diagram/description.
2). the (actual) Project Plan as followed,
3). the published/approved Business Requirements
     document.
4). the published/approved Functional/Non-Functional
     document,
5). the published/approved Technical Design
     Specification
6). the published/approved Test Plan,
7). the published/approved operating environment  
     technical design..... 

and throw in the list of all the meetings held and lastly, the overall count of WHO worked on this project by role....

If this information only partially exists we have the smoking-gun. Sadly, these findings are TYPICAL when IT Projects go down the drain.  But we already know this intuitively - honesty will not be found here - all will be covered up or merely stated as 'oh we did all that....' 

yea, that ought to add up to $600,000,000+ US Dollars 
 
Resonating is the old sage...' there is never enough time and money to do it right the first time, but there is always enough time and money to do it over again.'
 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Smart a$$ comments by me? maybe -but its like déjà vu....again  
oneilldon
IW Pick
100%
0%
oneilldon,
User Rank: Strategist
12/7/2013 | 10:09:25 AM
Affordable Care Act (ACA) Rollout: State of Failure
Video Comment
oneilldon
50%
50%
oneilldon,
User Rank: Strategist
12/7/2013 | 9:52:34 AM
The Way Forward
Those pretending that the problems being encountered are glitches, kinks, or simply bugs to be fixed and hoping that the problems will simply dissipate with the relaunch need to cease their wishful thinking. It is time to insist on the professional management steps needed to get to the bottom of this and right the ship.    

The following ten steps are called for immediately:

1. Use of ACA website by customers seeking healthcare insurance should be terminated. 

2. Existing customer profile data, personal data, and decision data should be quarantined. 

3. The ACA website requirements foundation and technical architecture should be reviewed, assessed, and audited by a team of experienced industry experts.

4. The management, engineering, and process practices employed on the project should be reviewed, assessed, and audited by a team of experienced industry experts.

5. The accumulated Technical Debt on the project should be reviewed, assessed, and audited by a team of experienced industry experts.

6. A professional team should be charged with assembling factual analytics associated with assurance metrics, compliance metrics, noncompliance metrics, product engineering metrics, project management metrics, and process metrics. 

7. A full scale program review should be conducted to assess requirements, architecture, practices, and metrics. The review team should record its findings and consequences and provide recommendations and rationale for carrying the project forward.

8. A professional team should be charged with assessing Cyber Security vulnerabilities in accordance with the NIST Cyber Framework.

9. A professional team should be charged with assessing privacy and civil liberties vulnerabilities in accordance with the NIST Cyber Framework.

10. The completion date for these activities should be established as December 16, 2013.

 
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
12/6/2013 | 12:53:37 PM
Re: Does anyone even know what HealthCare.Gov is built on?
An Operations Readiness Review, from Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, dated 9/4/13, shows a diagram broadly illustration what's used in the Presentation layer for end users (bulit using Apache RP, and Layer7 SOA gateway, using SAML2 assertion); an application layer that uses Jboss Enterprise Web Server and Jboss SOA.

More at: http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF14/20130910/101274/HHRG-113-IF14-Wstate-CampbellC-20130910.pdf

 
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
12/6/2013 | 11:46:05 AM
Re: Does anyone even know what HealthCare.Gov is built on?
We mostly asked about project management strategies. The architectural specifics are hard for anyone outside of the project to know in great detail, although this is an interesting resource:

http://www.civicagency.org/2013/10/learning-from-the-healthcare-gov-infrastructure/
rprescott
50%
50%
rprescott,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/5/2013 | 10:37:37 PM
unintended consequences
Okay. ..Real quick.  Most of the experienced spectators expected just what they have seen... An amateurish product delivered by a hands-off amateur. His two claims-to-fame are low level legislative "voting present" public sevice and " community organizer" resume entries. He had nothing else, save Ivy league law degrees, and we turned our country over to him. My wife and I are doing our darndest to position our daughter and son to be able to persevere, but a boat-load of our posterity are going to suffer the consequences of the naive. We are praying for them.

 

 
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
12/5/2013 | 1:09:35 PM
Re: Project Management
This is such a complex issue. The project management of this was bad, but is that because of te IT behind it or because of government procurement process?

Then, consider the implications of shutting the site down. Knowing that security issues existed, a business would have likely removed all functionality until the site was fixed. But the Obama administration could not deal with that type of fallout, allowing those of us on the sidelines to continue to debate this debacle. 
Page 1 / 4   >   >>


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - August 20, 2014
CIOs need people who know the ins and outs of cloud software stacks and security, and, most of all, can break through cultural resistance.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.