Comments
Google Yanks Buried Android Privacy Feature
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
George_B
100%
0%
George_B,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2013 | 2:13:40 PM
CyanogenMod has had this feature for years!
Being able to control app permissions has been a feature of CyanogenMod for years.  Google and handset carriers are likely not going to release this feature because it gives users too much control in their eyes and yes it can break apps.  Carriers want to be able to install their bloatware and by allowing users to control app permissions you can render any app unable to auto start or access the internet which is something carriers and app developers don't want you to be able to do.  

Every free app that comes with ads can have their internet permissions taken away so ads never load.  This is great for games and other apps that don't need the internet to function.  

Having issues with apps starting by themselves that you don't want/use?  You can take away their permissions to start themselves and their permissions to see the phone's state even if you can't uninstall them you can essentially disable the app by cutting off the permissions.  

Many app permissions seem to over-reach what the app should really need access to.  Do simple phone games really need to be able to see my contacts, call history, use the camera, etc.?  Most of the time no and disabling these permissions is a great way to protect yourself especially when there are many malicious apps out there.  

I will agree with Google that you can break apps.  If you take away Facebook App's ability to use the internet the app won't work and an inexperienced user might not understand how to correct an issue caused by taking away permissions.  It is certainly something for Advanced users.  

This is one of the many awesome features of CyanogenMod and I'm sure other mods for Android too.  I base my buying of Android phones based on which models are supported by CyanogenMod and this feature is one of the main reasons why I use CyanogenMod over Vanilla Android, HTC Sense, Motoblur, or any other Carrier/Manufacturer variations.  
nh905
100%
0%
nh905,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2013 | 2:38:34 PM
Re: CyanogenMod has had this feature for years!
To expand on George_B's post, I have had to pass over the most functional app because it asked for unnecessary permissions (like access to the Android system log) and the developer basically did not care to listen.  Without rooting the phone, carrier-installed bloatware cannot be uninstalled.  Even if there is rational for specific permissions, it appears that ad delivery libraries inherit the permissions of the app (http://mostconf.org/2012/papers/27.pdf) and I definitely do not want them poking around my phone.  Google needs to step up to the security issues with Android, from misuse of permissions to the glacial pace of upgrades from carriers.

 
pwhenderson
100%
0%
pwhenderson,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2013 | 4:55:43 PM
Last straw
I've towed the Google line for more than a decade.  Androids self starting, speed eating apps, contacts accessing apps have always been a scourge.  I have been greatly enjoying app opps permission manager for a few weeks now.  Im devastated that I no longer have that ability.  I didn't know the consequences of updating.  I wish I hadn't.  So you all know, I also cannot turn off my gps now - perma on.  I'll be changing op systems now.  It's been a long time coming.  Time I've wasted watching Google evolve into big brother.  
danielcawrey
100%
0%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
12/14/2013 | 5:06:04 PM
Re: CyanogenMod has had this feature for years!
As an Android user, I personally would prefer to have more granularity in terms of privacy on some of these third party apps. Like the article points out, when an Android user downloads an app from Google Play, a splash screen appears telling the user what permissions the app must use, all in one list. You either take it or leave it. 

I would rather be able to control these things through a console, which is what is described here. I think location, in particular, is something I am concerned about. 
samicksha
50%
50%
samicksha,
User Rank: Strategist
12/16/2013 | 4:30:22 AM
Re: CyanogenMod has had this feature for years!
Any one here with more information on Sandbox as i guess android application run in an isolated area of the system that does not have access to the rest of the system's resources, unless access permissions are explicitly granted by the user when the application is installed.
AlphaGeek
100%
0%
AlphaGeek,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2013 | 3:22:09 PM
Good Grief, Google
As a professional software developer, any time I forcibly remove choices and control from my users, I do them a disservice.  Yes, some users need heavy-handed automation and guidance.  Those can certainly be defaults, but a user who desires to take matters into their own hands, once sufficiently warned, has every right to expect me not only to "allow" such activity, but also not to force my will upon the user by purposefully removing their choice.

 

As a consumer, no developer or manufacturer can or should tell us what we will or will not do with anything we purchase from them, specifically the hardware we buy which is our personal property after the sale is complete and solely our own to do with whatever we please.  Period.  The mere concept of a manufacturer thinking that they could possibly dictate or control capriciously what someone does or does not do with their hardware is ludicrous, insulting, and above all - futile and pointless.


I have no desire to materially harm any manufacturer or developer in any way (though I fantasize about choking the crap out of many of them).  This is why I am so very much a fan of the Android AOSP, and the excellent work that has been done by teams like CyanogenMod and individuals like ChainFire and Koushik Dutta.  Some manufacturers like HTC seem to have at least some notion that it is not antithetical to profitability to work with their customers and fellow developers who want to explore the hardware (HTC directly provides SDKs, APIs, and tools for rooting their devices), instead of against us (Samsung S4, anyone?).  I applaud those manufacturers who have caught on, and I invite others to do the same.  C'mon!  Jump in.  We're not sharks.  We don't bite (too hard), and the water is fine!

Happy Holidays!
anon2815144809
50%
50%
anon2815144809,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/15/2013 | 2:49:14 AM
Google Yanks Buried Android Privacy Feature
And geeks put it right back.  Its a great feature I use it to control my apps. A firewall of sorts, they should of made it available to all.
chrisp114
50%
50%
chrisp114,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/16/2013 | 4:28:49 PM
Leave google now!
Google should be shut down and their management should be thrown in prison for life. Every site should be privacy-based, by law. I like these companies (because of their great privacy): DuckDuckGo, Ravetree, and HushMail. Use them. Tell everyone about them. The more people that use privacy-based sites, the better they will become. We have to support them if we want to win the war on privacy.
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Strategist
12/16/2013 | 6:15:24 PM
"Accidental" release not reassuring to privacy advocates
A feature that gives users some control over permissions granted to Andoid apps. What a great idea for privacy. Google released it "accidentally" and now pulls it back? Was this accident discovered after some developers started standing Google's privacy model on its head? This incident doesn't resolve anything, but that's just it. You kind of assume the worst when it comes to Google on privacy.
asksqn
50%
50%
asksqn,
User Rank: Ninja
12/16/2013 | 9:38:15 PM
User privacy v. security
So it comes down to Droid users having to choose between privacy or security. Google needs to do the right thing and give users both instead forcing a choice otherwise all bets are off when it comes to competing with Apple.
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
12/24/2013 | 2:53:54 AM
Re : Google Yanks Buried Android Privacy Feature
Smart phone users are not that stupid as has been assumed. When a user is installing apps like Facebook, he/she knows that it needs internet access. If he didn't, why would he or she bother to install it in the first place?When users install apps from Play store, they know what those apps are used for. If I install some app and know its functioning, there is no sense of my blocking a permission that is necessary for app's working.
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
12/24/2013 | 2:53:59 AM
Re : Google Yanks Buried Android Privacy Feature
Expanding on the argument of literate users, come control should be provided to users regarding specific permissions. It would also expose apps taking unnecessary permissionse.g. a game requesting access to contacts information or call log.It would put users in control of their privacy and that is how it should be done.
StephanieGina
50%
50%
StephanieGina,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/27/2013 | 10:46:18 AM
Stopped downloading any apps...
I will not download any app that requires access to my contacts, location, etc., etc,. etc., when it has absolutely no reason to do so.  Sadly I upgraded and lost this control feature which did not seem to affect any app I removed contacts and location from.  Given this deplorable state of privacy and control over my own device, the Play Store is quickly becoming my "dead zone" and will remain so until this feature is restored.


Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014
Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of November 16, 2014.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.