Comments
NSA's Malware Heroics Questioned By Security Experts
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
12/24/2013 | 2:49:56 AM
Re : NSA's Malware Heroics Questioned By Security Experts
@ Shane M. O'Neill, you are absolutely right. On the NSA's side, what purpose could they have achieved by arranging such poorly crafted piece? Considering the caliber of the agency, they could have done much better than this. They should have considered that market is full of security experts who would expose the whole thing and that's exactly what happened.
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Ninja
12/24/2013 | 2:49:52 AM
Re : NSA's Malware Heroics Questioned By Security Experts
It served nobody any good. It's a shame that such journalistic avenues as 60 minutesin which people put their trust should become partners in someone's public relations or propaganda campaigns.It is unethical to say the least.It amounts to flouting the very tenets upon which the whole edifice of journalism is erected.
ANON1236026178181
50%
50%
ANON1236026178181,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/21/2013 | 2:24:51 PM
fbi/cia are the terrorists
The fbi must create criminals and must also increase their numbers and magnify their dangerousness:

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/governmentmustcr.html

http://vancouver.mediacoop.ca/story/age-madness-critical-review-fbicia-operations/9375

Out of control are fbi's own thugs advancing with arms extending, fingers pointing, mouths wide opening and evil proclivities protruding (see Living Dead: http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/statement.html )

Modus Operandi of fbi: drive a person to neuroses, or insanity; set him up for a crime using fbi operatives; prosecute the confused and disoriented human being for offenses that in fact the fbi committed.



Domestic enemies:



http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2011/09/consent-of-governed-not.html

'Ask not what your country can do for you'; ask what your country can do TO you.
Overthrown government of usa now controlled by very dangerous and murderous thugs (*beasts) of fbi/CIA/homeland security.

http://lissakr11humane.com/2012/09/08/collapse-of-the-constitutional-government-of-the-united-states-of-america-by-geral-sosbee/

high tech torture, ELF, by low minded thugs of fbi:

http://rudy2.wordpress.com/ex-fbi-agent-geral-sosbees-testimony-in-various-languages/

http://rudy2.wordpress.com/brain-and-satellite-surveillance/



fbi/MAFIA

http://la.indymedia.org/uploads/2013/04/20120509-mafia.jpga0lahp.jpgmid.jpg



*'Veterans Today', Dr. Preston James on usa corruption & fbi murderous evil:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/11/28/alien-ets-hybrids-and-911/

Evil in focus:

The *worldwide network of friends of the accused and terrorized who struggle in intellectual and spiritual opposition against the **human monsters of our generation thanks you, each & every one in our company, for your efforts to expose the methods and identities of the torturers and assassins of our culture; surely stopping such evil is the greatest goal or ideal of our time, and our work is therefore among the most noble of human endeavors because we labor and suffer to rid our species of the demonic-like curse and degenerative affliction that punctuate the demise or downfall of our violently corrupted civilization. Respectfully, geral
*
http://sosbeevfbi.com/worldwidenetwork.html

**
http://www.gangstalkingwiki.com/
Mathew
50%
50%
Mathew,
User Rank: Moderator
12/17/2013 | 7:27:31 AM
Re: NSA puff piece
Thanks for your comment. Interesting point. But when you ask the head of the NSA if his agency is conducting a massive surveillance operation that hacks into Internet backbones or server farms to suck up millions of records from the likes of Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo, and he replies by saying "we do target terrorist communications," is that a meaningful response?

I see it a bit like asking your kid if they went to the corner grocery store and bought a Milky Way, or even 10 or 100, only to have them respond: "I do go shopping." It's a non-response. To me, it doesn't advance the discussion in any meaningful way. It's just hot air, chewing up face time on TV.
tsreyb
0%
100%
tsreyb,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/17/2013 | 6:22:25 AM
Re: NSA puff piece
The example of Gen Alexander's 'evasion and doublespeak' didn't hold water for me. His response, whether I agree with it or not, did in fact answer the question in a cohesive manner. I had no sense of evasion and/or doublespeak in his response.
WKash
100%
0%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
12/16/2013 | 6:08:55 PM
Re: NSA puff piece
Shane, I have to agree. 

NSA is just borrowing a page from the crisis managment playbook that corporations use when the media pounces on wrong doing. But it's disappointing to see 60 Minutes playing into the game.

 
Thomas Claburn
100%
0%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
12/16/2013 | 3:43:04 PM
Re: NSA puff piece
Agreed. A very one-sided piece, and it's not as if it would have been difficult to find a source with different viewpoint.
danielcawrey
100%
0%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
12/16/2013 | 2:25:35 PM
Re: NSA puff piece
I watched the 60 Minutes piece. And it didn't seem right. Why, for example, would the ultrasecretive NSA let CBS into their building? Normally they would have no incentive to do this, but now that the public wants to see some curtials, they are on the PR offensive. 
TerryB
100%
0%
TerryB,
User Rank: Ninja
12/16/2013 | 1:20:06 PM
Not what they used to be
60 Minutes has really gone downhill. I guess you heard their report on Libya embassy massacre was flawed. They used sources without vetting them and reporter ran with things known not to be true. They were considering firing reporter, never heard if they did.

If NSA requested interview, you know darn well it was for propaganda purposes.
Shane M. O'Neill
100%
0%
Shane M. O'Neill,
User Rank: Author
12/16/2013 | 12:34:54 PM
NSA puff piece
The whole time I was watching the "60 Minutes" segment I kept waiting for a counterpoint to the NSA's FUD spreading and its denial of privacy violations. Lord knows there are plent of security experts who could have provided some balance. But it never happened. The reporter was too soft and the final result was an NSA infomercial. Seems like in return for unprecedented access to NSA facilities "60 Minutes" agreed to do a puff piece.


IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and trends on InformationWeek.com
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.