Comments
Most Wasteful Government IT Projects Of 2013
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Strategist
12/27/2013 | 2:17:38 PM
$1 billion down the drain on an uncompleted Air Force project?
The Air Force spent $1 billion on ERP over 7 years, then cancels? The AF needs ERP. The logistics of keeping planes in the air is stunning, especially when they're in motion to different bases around the world. If this project was cancelled, what will replace it?
MichaelB097
50%
50%
MichaelB097,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/27/2013 | 9:39:38 PM
Everything with Government I.T. is "Easier said than done"
Easy to say it, "you  could save money by using the same I.T. systems for the C.I.A. and the Dept. of Health (DHHS)".... also use the same systems for the F.T.C., the S.E.C., the Justice Dept., and the Atomic Energy Commision....easy, no problem........be sure to use the same system for the F.C.C., so we can all get irradiated via our T.V. sets......
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
12/29/2013 | 11:45:24 AM
Re: $1 billion down the drain on an uncompleted Air Force project?
I cannot believe that the government spends money on duplicate projects. No revenue producing organization would ever do that.

I think we really need to question whether government is really capable of building efficient IT systems. They are proving through these Wastebook findings that they are hapless in the face of IT procurement and project execution. 
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
12/27/2013 | 3:20:22 PM
The easy fix
There is an easy fix for this: give the GOA the power to cut the budget by the amounts deemed wasted. If the Air Force has to do with over a billion less this monkey business will stop really quickly.
J_Brandt
50%
50%
J_Brandt,
User Rank: Ninja
12/30/2013 | 12:17:00 PM
Re: The easy fix
Hmm I like that idea!
anon9823936674
50%
50%
anon9823936674,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/30/2013 | 10:08:10 PM
Where is the accountability to the voters?
Where was Portfoliostat to check out the IT resume of the contractor chosen for the healthcare dot gov. debacle? Had the Obama Administration bothered to conduct any sort of due diligencing it would have discovered that the company was previously sued by 22 different states and school ddistricts. Instead, it plowed forward in the same reckless manner the Congress did when it passed the epic fail ACA.
asksqn
50%
50%
asksqn,
User Rank: Ninja
12/30/2013 | 10:15:29 PM
Where is the accountability
Where was Portfoliostat to check out the IT resume of the contractor chosen for the healthcare dot gov. debacle? Had the Obama Administration bothered to conduct any sort of due diligencing it would have discovered that the company was previously sued by 22 different states and school ddistricts. Instead, it plowed forward in the same reckless manner the Congress did when it passed the epic fail ACA.
anon9355256492
50%
50%
anon9355256492,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/30/2013 | 10:20:26 PM
If government only 'wasted' $350M per year, it sounds like a success story
Irresponsible journalism. 

1. The USAF project represents $1B spent over 8 years, how many other projects contain multi-year spending?

2. The redundant medical, dental, and Medicare systems show the total operational cost, not the wasteful, redundant amount. How many of these examples appear inflated for sensationalism?

3. If the top 6 wasteful projects equal $350M/year, that is not even one half of one percent of the $82B Federal IT budget. You got snowed with these softballs they gave you.

4. $350M/year found in the top wasteful projects of 2013 is equal to $1 per American. Give it up.

 

P.S. I'd like more info on the NSF ARG to attract more young women to STEM. There is nothing on Google.
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
12/31/2013 | 9:17:48 AM
Re: If government only 'wasted' $350M per year, it sounds like a success story
A billion here, a billion there and soon we're talking about real money.

The report doesn't identify "only" $350 million in wasteful federal government IT spending. It identifies close to $350 million in duplicate IT projects. The waste certainly goes much deeper across government agencies. Either way, it's nothing to crow about.

I just love it when wasteful government spending is broken down to per-person or per-day/month increments to show how minimal the spending is. For that matter, $350 million amounts to only about 4 cents per American per hour. Chump change!
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
12/31/2013 | 12:23:33 PM
As if the private sector doesn't waste money?
No one likes to see taxpayer dollars go down the drain, let alone $1 billion. But let's not lose site of the fact that big investments fail all the time in the private sector.

Consider the write downs of the banking industry on loans that went bad during the housing collapse. We're talking nearly $40 billion each for Citibank and USB.

Or consider Canad'a Barrick Gold, which had to walk away from a failed mining investment just this year and took a $8.7 billion hit. 

Or even HP, which reported a net loss in its third fiscal quarter of $8.9 billion, largely because of a major write-off in the value of its Electronic Data Systems unit (which it bought for $13.9 billion and failed to yield the growth H.P. had hoped for.)

At least the Air Force had the courage to walk away after $1 billion, instead of trying to salvage what was actually a $5 billion planned investment.

Finally, it's important to remember that much of the waste and duplicative spending in government is a direct result of Congressmen who fear kilingl programs that would lead to the elimination of jobs in their districts. Time and again, even the worst programs that agencies want to kill continue to be funded (by law, via Congress) because of political deference to the voters back home. 

I'm with Rob Preston on this one. Senator Coburn's list of wasteful/duplicative government IT projects is actually a sign that the executive branch has made good progress in weeding out poor performing IT projects.

 
anon9458049733
50%
50%
anon9458049733,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/2/2014 | 9:48:53 AM
redundancy or waste?
Not a "belt and suspenders" type of person who apparently wants to design in a single point of failure. Is the a shock that, with so many, that things do not work?
anon5553850221
50%
50%
anon5553850221,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/2/2014 | 9:50:08 AM
What happened?
This report does not provide explanations (Did I miss something?) to reasons behind such huge waste. Even within the same agency, nobody knows what others are doing?
politics_right
50%
50%
politics_right,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/3/2014 | 6:32:32 PM
Solution? Elusive
Martin Gross has written several excellent books on govt. waste, but he appears to think there is some rhyme or reason  to government spending. It's all about growing your budget and prestige, which is the corrupted moderrn meaning of "politics". Plato and Aristotle would be disgusted at our state of affairs.


IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
IT's Reputation: What the Data Says
InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014
InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and trends on InformationWeek.com
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.