Comments
7 Mistakes Microsoft Made In 2013
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
jries921
50%
50%
jries921,
User Rank: Moderator
12/30/2013 | 1:06:42 PM
One more
Announcing Steve Ballmer's retirement before his successor had been appointed.


My suspicion is that the reorg was decided upon before Mr. Ballmer decided to retire early, but that wouldn't be public knowledge.  I'm guessing that the board gave him an ultimatum shortly before the retirement was announced (the other alternative being dismissal).

 
jgherbert
100%
0%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
12/30/2013 | 11:38:09 AM
Re: "The time for that move was 2013. Alas, it didn't happen, so it's on our list."
And so from this we conclude that Microsoft has great R&D but an inability to see which products are going to be successful or, perhaps, to accomplish the task of taking a product from idea to market. Maybe they've just got scared as they have got larger, and don't want to be seen betting the house on something new. Maybe they just don't have the flair for marketing that Apple does (and, love them or hate them, you gotta give Apple credit for knowing how to create demand).

 

Your underlying point stands then; by playing the follower rather than the innovator, Microsoft runs the risk of losing all credibility in the marketplace and ending up as an "also-ran" in many technology areas, following a well-beaten path behind such behemoths as IBM and Xerox.
jgherbert
100%
0%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
12/30/2013 | 11:34:08 AM
Re: RT name dump a bad decision?
You're right that the need to keep a distinction because of incompatibility. Of course, they kind of created their own problem here by trying to make everything look exactly the same on the surface (no pun intended) when underneath they're really not. 

 

Interestingly, Apple has the same logical issue of a tablet/phone platform that runs different software to the laptop/computer platform, yet seems to manage this much more gracefully. Perhaps while iOS is a limiting factor in the "pseudo-laptop" capabilities of the iPad, in the same way, dumbing Win8 down enough that it will work on other form factors was a worse idea.

 
DominicG929
50%
50%
DominicG929,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/30/2013 | 10:58:28 AM
RT name dump a bad decision?
As confusing as it was to have Windows RT, I don't agree with dumping the name.  There are major compatibility issues between RT and 8 (since software designed to run on x86 CPUs doesn't natively run on ARM CPUs), and there needed to be something to denote to customers that they aren't the same.  If anything, they should have called it something more meaningful, like Windows Tablet.
melgross
100%
0%
melgross,
User Rank: Ninja
12/30/2013 | 10:33:11 AM
Surface sales
I'd like to have Microsoft give out sell through on Surface. We get the idea of how well a Microsoft product is doing depending on whether they announce sales or not. If it's doing well, they tell us the numbers. If not, then they don't give us the numbers. Selling out means nothing. So far, skepticism over Surface sales seems proper.
sgbeal
100%
0%
sgbeal,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/30/2013 | 10:19:49 AM
"The time for that move was 2013. Alas, it didn't happen, so it's on our list."
The past decade, MS has made a habit of waiting 3 years to respond to any market activities of its competitors (e.g. compare the release dates of Google Docs and Office Online). They demonstrated Surface computing YEARS before anyone else and then SAT ON IT, not doing anything with it until 2+ years after Apple, then Android, ran with tablet computing (a very close relative of Surface computing). To be honest, i'm not sure what's keeping MS afloat. They are becoming less and less relevant in the world, quite possibly for the reason the author mentions: that they assume everyone wants a single-platform solution to all their problems. If that's what they continue to believe, and act on, well... so long, Microsoft!
<<   <   Page 3 / 3


The Agile Archive
The Agile Archive
When it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Elite 100 - 2014
Our InformationWeek Elite 100 issue -- our 26th ranking of technology innovators -- shines a spotlight on businesses that are succeeding because of their digital strategies. We take a close at look at the top five companies in this year's ranking and the eight winners of our Business Innovation awards, and offer 20 great ideas that you can use in your company. We also provide a ranked list of our Elite 100 innovators.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.