Comments
Windows 9: What We Know
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
anon9146533713
100%
0%
anon9146533713,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/16/2014 | 12:01:12 PM
While I do love W8 dearly . . .
I have to say that the PM decision to force a touch optimized interface (Metro) down the throats of users on non-touch enabled devices (laptops/PCs), and then disable features that made the product useful on non-touch enabled devices (no boot to desktop/removal of Start Menu), had to be one of the most bone-headed decisions in the history of Microsoft.

Don't get me wrong, I think W8 is a great OS, and coming up with a single OS that looks and works great on all devices is a great idea. But the feature choice that went into the original W8 has to rank as one of the worst blunders in IT history.

 
danielcawrey
0%
100%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
1/16/2014 | 11:59:21 AM
Re: On purpose?
What's the point of upgrading an existing PC to Windows 8? There isn't a really good defining reason to do so. Sure, new computers come with the OS standard. But if people were expecting a similar experience when they got version 8.0, they were in for a bewildering episode. 

I'm not sure what Microsoft is planning for version 9, but just adding new features and a refreshed UI is really not compelling enough. 
rradina
50%
50%
rradina,
User Rank: Ninja
1/16/2014 | 10:55:13 AM
Not Sure I Agree...
[QUOTE]But from bringing back to the Start button to using the name "Windows 9" instead of "Windows 8.x"[/QUOTE]

Does bumping a product's version number indicate the prior version is a failure?  What if we applied that to Android and iOS releases?  While I don't disagree that there are plenty of things about Windows 8.x that still don't appeal to customers, I disagree that not using 8.2 or 8.3 or 8.5 is evidence of it being a failure.

While it's probably too late, Windows 8.1 did fix most of the "dead ends" that folks experienced in Windows 8.  (For example when you are using Win8 desktop IE on a non-touch device and you click on a PDF.  Out of the box, the metro PDF viewer appears and it's not at all obvious how to get back to the browser.)

[QUOTE]It will also allow Modern apps, currently confined to the tile-oriented Start screen, to be run in floating windows on the desktop, presumably just like legacy applications.[/QUOTE]

While I welcome the ability run tiled apps in windows on the desktop, I still sense disconnect when folks continue to write about the "two sides" of Windows.  Modern tiled apps are really just maximized Windows without borders running on the "desktop".  (Of course desktop is really just a virtual term but...)  For that matter, the new tiled start menu is no different than any modern app.  Of course we could also turn that around and say that the classic desktop is simply a maximized window without borders too.  Perhaps this will demonstrate my point:  On a device loaded with x86 Win 8.x, go to the desktop and open the familiar task manager.  Resize the task manager window so that it's perhaps the 1/4 the size of the desktop (or smaller if you want).  Select Options from the menu and select "Always on top".  Now go back to the "tiled menu".  Start a modern application.  Start a desktop application.

It's all just smoke and mirrors.  I get it that people don't like it but why does it take Microsoft 15 months to make metro apps run as resizable windows on a desktop?  I also understand we can have the start button back and another third party add-on even enables Metro apps to run as windows on the desktop RIGHT NOW.  If these strategies are THAT important to the success of Windows 9, it seems Microsoft could release Windows 8.2 this spring.  Since this is all just smoke and mirrors, I also suspect it's possible that 8.2 could allow folks to customize their experience and choose whether or not they want the old or new or new-new start menu and whether or not they want to run modern touch apps in windows on the classic desktop.

Of course if they do this, do they risk fragmenting the user experience to the point where developers cringe at testing all the ways folks could be trying to use their apps?  Some modern apps already suffer from 8.1's ability to run on lower screen resolutions.  There are also apps that don't behave properly when using the split-screen app view.  Along with potentially infinite resolutions, infinite desktop window sizes and various forms of split-screen options, it sounds like an even bigger mess that's the worn out topic of almost every blogger and tech journalist.
Li Tan
0%
100%
Li Tan,
User Rank: Ninja
1/16/2014 | 12:29:53 AM
Re: The fun REALLY starts in April
My attitude is the same - except there is good reason or really killing apps, I won't upgrade from Win8 to Win9. I rely heavily on cloud and web-based applications. The exact OS is not of much importance to me. What I need from OS is the usability and stability. Bringing back the Start menu is a good thing but this is not a strong enough justification for me to go for Win9.
Gary_EL
100%
0%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
1/15/2014 | 10:33:19 PM
The fun REALLY starts in April
I'm not doing anything different on my Windows 7 machine than I did on my XP machine - there are no new "killer apps" that call for a new OS. The only reasons I even "updated" to 7 were a broken motherboard and XP's upcoming abandonment. Like so many others, I do most things on the cloud, so the OS gets more and more irrelevant. If my impending Chromebook laptop works out, when MS prematurely obsoletes 7 and expects me to shell out again for 9 - I won't.

BTW - it'll be interesting when systems and operations dependant on XP machines supposedly isolated from the internet start failing from virus attacks, and airline reservation systems, ATM networks, retail cash registers and I'm almost afraid to think of what else stop working, it'll be fun watching the government to start forcing Microsoft to provide a fix for "obsolete" XP systems.
PaulS681
50%
50%
PaulS681,
User Rank: Ninja
1/15/2014 | 7:23:52 PM
Re: On purpose?
@ Lorna.. It does seem that way doesnt it. But I can't believe they are making money when they do this. It's a mystery why a company like MS thinks it knows better than the users of its OS.
PaulS681
50%
50%
PaulS681,
User Rank: Ninja
1/15/2014 | 7:21:56 PM
MS Repeating itself
Isn't this getting old with MS? Windows Me was a failure. Vista was also a failure and Windows 7 was the fix. Now is Windows 9 going to be the fix for 8? Atleast they are fixing things but why are they breaking Windows in the first place?
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
1/15/2014 | 3:56:36 PM
Re: On purpose?
There's something sad about the fact that Windows is buttressed by the public's inability to imagine word processing and spreadsheets beyond Office and about the fact that the presence or absence of the Start menu matters to people. I wish Microsoft would focus on apps and operating system capabilities that blow people's minds rather than mulling ways to get people to pay for more or less the same commodity functionality every two or three years.
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
1/15/2014 | 3:04:38 PM
On purpose?
Microsoft has done the "good release > bad release > good release" dance for so long that you have to wonder if they don't crap up alternate versions of Windows on purpose, just to stay in the news.
<<   <   Page 2 / 2


The Business of Going Digital
The Business of Going Digital
Digital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - August 27, 2014
Who wins in cloud price wars? Short answer: not IT. Enterprises don't want bare-bones IaaS. Providers must focus on support, not undercutting rivals.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.