Comments
IBM Bets Big On Global Datacenter Network
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Strategist
1/17/2014 | 2:53:48 PM
Getting to 40
Wall Street Journal reports IBM needs 15 additional data centers to reach its goal of 40. IBM's Dennis Quan didn't have a definite figure during the interview. InformationWeek eatimated 17 needed, based on previously reported SoftLayer and SmartCloud data centers. Take your pick.
Laurianne
50%
50%
Laurianne,
User Rank: Author
1/17/2014 | 3:35:45 PM
Re: Getting to 40
Charlie, how does the scale of this commitment compare to IBM's closest rivals?
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
User Rank: Author
1/17/2014 | 3:55:25 PM
Low cost
"... as contrasted with the commoditized cloud model that emphasizes low costs, instead of business growth and innovation."

Seems like companies will only do this -- take on this risk -- if it lowers costs. They might also see the growth and innovation elements, wrapped in some kind of "agility" language, but won't the table stakes for any IT exec be lowering costs compared with the current option?
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
1/17/2014 | 7:26:07 PM
So how many data centers does Amazon Web Services have?
Laurianne, IBM's 40 global data centers compares favorably to Verizon Terremark's 49 and CenturyLink Savvis' 50. The telcos had lots of data centers before cloud computing came along to support their network operations. I've never inspected a Verizon or CenturyLink data center to verify that the whole thing is dedicated to cloud computing. My guess is, it isn't. Nevertheless, they are my two best examples of global reach. Amazon Web Services lists seven regions in which it operates data centers around the world. Because Amazon has multiple "availability zones" in each center, think independent power and communications or a small, free standing center, I count each Amazon region as more than one data center but can't supply an exact comparison. Something like 16 or 18 is realistic, in my opinion.

   
Stratustician
50%
50%
Stratustician,
User Rank: Ninja
1/20/2014 | 1:59:46 PM
Global, but still a US Company?
I'm curious to see if this is really a strong play to look like a more global company when it comes to hosting data, since a lot of organizations are starting to prefer non-US based data centres thanks to the NSA revelations.  I'd be curious to see how these data centres are connected, and how things like load balancing across geographic zones and other inter-geographical affected services would affect the compliance requirements for customers in each location.


Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 14, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.